chore: 10-iteration quality audit and output stabilization#17
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8ac33ff372
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| has_frontmatter="pass" | ||
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| if grep -Eq '(\.\./skills/|templates/|docs/)' "${path}"; then |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Restrict workflow-reference check to actual workflow refs
The has_skill_or_workflow audit currently matches any docs/ reference, and every command now includes ../docs/command-output-contract.md, so this column will report pass even when a command has no skill/workflow linkage. That makes the generated quality report systematically overstate compliance and can hide regressions in command wiring.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Summary
docs/command-output-contract.md)scripts/quality_audit_commands.sh) and report (docs/quality-iterations-2026-02-21.md)1.10.1Validation