-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
microcloud: Subnet sharing warning should check interfaces not IPs #522
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
microcloud: Subnet sharing warning should check interfaces not IPs #522
Conversation
8e01972
to
3c0887c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for moving the existing check from IPs to interfaces. Please have a look at my last comment, I think we should check the other two remaining ifaces as well.
cmd/microcloud/main_init.go
Outdated
if subnet.Contains(underlayIP) { | ||
fmt.Printf("Warning: OVN underlay IP (%s) is shared with the Ceph cluster network (%s)\n", underlayIP.String(), subnet.String()) | ||
if sys.OVNGeneveIface == sys.MicroCephInternalNetworkIface { | ||
fmt.Printf("Warning: OVN underlay (IP: %s) is shared on the same network interface %q with the Ceph cluster network (IP: %s)\n", underlayIP.String(), sys.OVNGeneveIface, subnet.String()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
subnet
above seems to be redundant now as you can just use sys.MicroCephInternalNetworkSubnet
instead of subnet.String()
.
9cec54a
to
eb8c057
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, just one suggestion to reduce complexity & prevent having lots of extra fields & types.
cmd/microcloud/ask.go
Outdated
// ipWithIface is a helper struct to store an IP address and | ||
// its corresponding network interface. | ||
type ipWithIface struct { | ||
ip net.IP | ||
ifaceName string | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of maintaining both this and several fields for each interface on InitSystem
, why not just introduce a new type Network
with 3 fields: Interface
, IP
, Subnet
which are populated by the corresponding values from net.Interface
.
Then each of OVNGeneveAddr
MicroCephInternalSubnet
, and MicroCephPublicSubnet
can be changed to OVNGeneveNetwork
, CephInternalNetwork
, CephPublicNetwork
respectively.
And finally validateSystems
you can check per-cluster member if any local interface names clash, and then across all cluster members if the subnets clash.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree
eb8c057
to
a9f6ca7
Compare
@masnax @roosterfish I reworked the approach based on #522 (comment) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, just saw I never submitted the review. Please have a look when you find time.
cmd/microcloud/ask.go
Outdated
c.systems[sh.Name] = bootstrapSystem | ||
|
||
// This is to avoid the situation where the internal network for Ceph has been skipped, but the public network has been set. | ||
// Ceph will automatically set the internal network to the public Ceph network if the internal network is not set, which is not what we want. | ||
// Instead, we still want to keep the internal Ceph network to use the MicroCloud internal network as a default. | ||
if internalCephSubnet == microCloudInternalNetworkAddrCIDR { | ||
bootstrapSystem.MicroCephInternalNetworkSubnet = microCloudInternalNetworkAddrCIDR | ||
microcloudNetworkInterface, err := lxd.FindInterfaceForSubnet(microCloudInternalNetworkAddrCIDR) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if InitSystem
should grow another MicroCloudInternalNetwork *Network
where we can store this information after the user has selected the internal address for MicroCloud?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I had the same thinking I remember... For now, it seems that we don't need it for the current state of things but it might be needed in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My thinking was if we now check for collisions in between the OVN and Ceph networks, wouldn't it be worth also including the MicroCloud internal network into those checks?
cmd/microcloud/main_init.go
Outdated
// If there are multiple subnet types on the same subnet, we have a collision. | ||
if len(subnetTypeToPeers) > 1 { | ||
var sb strings.Builder | ||
sb.WriteString("WARNING: Subnet collision detected:\n") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this PR will probably land after the "look & feel" I'll add a link here for reference on the note box #505 (comment)
Also requires a rebase now due to the recent CLI changes. |
Thanks for the feedback! |
a9f6ca7
to
e93d076
Compare
@roosterfish updated |
cmd/microcloud/ask.go
Outdated
c.systems[sh.Name] = bootstrapSystem | ||
|
||
// This is to avoid the situation where the internal network for Ceph has been skipped, but the public network has been set. | ||
// Ceph will automatically set the internal network to the public Ceph network if the internal network is not set, which is not what we want. | ||
// Instead, we still want to keep the internal Ceph network to use the MicroCloud internal network as a default. | ||
if internalCephSubnet == microCloudInternalNetworkAddrCIDR { | ||
bootstrapSystem.MicroCephInternalNetworkSubnet = microCloudInternalNetworkAddrCIDR | ||
microcloudNetworkInterface, err := lxd.FindInterfaceForSubnet(microCloudInternalNetworkAddrCIDR) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My thinking was if we now check for collisions in between the OVN and Ceph networks, wouldn't it be worth also including the MicroCloud internal network into those checks?
9f57467
to
1a8b231
Compare
1a8b231
to
94488b6
Compare
94488b6
to
a3b5fb2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding the test cases!
The validation still seems to be outputting something else in case of single node MicroCloud. Please have a look at my comments.
name: "single system interface collision", | ||
systems: map[string]InitSystem{ | ||
"system1": { | ||
MicroCephInternalNetwork: newNetwork("eth0", "10.0.1.0/24"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was looking for this test!
Because when you try to deploy a single node MicroCloud and select the same network for all MicroCloud internal, Ceph internal/public and OVN geneve you only get this:
- MicroCloud internal network, OVN underlay sharing network interface "enp5s0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So it proves detectCollisions
does the right thing it's only that in the actual code it's presumably called with the wrong inputs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I don't think I understand what you mean.. What do you think I should change in this test?
This type will be used to store a variety of subnet informations and which local network interface they will use. This will be used both for configuring MicroCloud but for running validation as well (e.g, interface collisions within a member, subnet collisions between members of a cluster) Signed-off-by: Gabriel Mougard <gabriel.mougard@canonical.com>
This will be needed to get a network interface info from a CIDR subnet notation (e.g, mostly in the case of configuring MicroCloud internal and public networks) Signed-off-by: Gabriel Mougard <gabriel.mougard@canonical.com>
…MicroCephPublicNetwork` and `MicroCephInternalNetwork` instead of `OVNGeneveAddr`, `MicroCephPublicNetworkSubnet` and `MicroCephInternalNetworkSubnet` Signed-off-by: Gabriel Mougard <gabriel.mougard@canonical.com>
This function detect the local network interface collisions and the global subet collisions Signed-off-by: Gabriel Mougard <gabriel.mougard@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Mougard <gabriel.mougard@canonical.com>
a3b5fb2
to
c6ab1d7
Compare
closes #516