Determine if evaporation rate is greater than precipitation rate #17
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This approach doesn't really work - during hot days turfgrass will actually accelerate water loss (not prevent it). To calculate this impact created #18 Until we can approximate total water loss, will come up with some other made up factor from observation. A Terf Nerf value, if you will. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Determine if a more accurate way to determine threshold levels for precipitation is by calculating the evaporation rate.
Goal would be to ultimately evaluate two conditions: is it about to rain, or did it previously rain enough?
Need to anecdotally verify that this approach works.