[WIP] Proposal for "M" type topologies

[marcosmc]

The changes required to be able to use "M" type topologies in the tool are explained using comments of the type # TODO: (M-topologies):

• Proposal for the producer model with Zone 1

        #  Expected input example:
        #  Dynawo
        #  ├─── Zone3
        #  │     ├─── Producer.dyd
        #  │     ├─── Producer.par
        #  │     └─── Producer.ini
        #  └─── Zone1
        #        ├─── Producer_G1.dyd
        #        ├─── Producer_G1.par
        #        ├─── Producer_G1.ini
        #        ├─── Producer_G2.dyd
        #        ├─── Producer_G2.par
        #        └─── Producer_G2.ini

• Proposal for producer/reference curves with Zone 1

        #  Expected input example:
        #  ReferenceCurves
        #  ├── CurvesFiles.ini
        #  ...
        #  ├── PCS_RTE-I16z1.SetPointStep.Voltage.Producer_G1.csv
        #  ├── PCS_RTE-I16z1.SetPointStep.Voltage.Producer_G1.dict
        #  ├── PCS_RTE-I16z1.SetPointStep.Voltage.Producer_G2.csv
        #  ├── PCS_RTE-I16z1.SetPointStep.Voltage.Producer_G2.dict
        #  ...
        #  ├── PCS_RTE-I16z3.PSetPointStep.Dec40.csv
        #  ├── PCS_RTE-I16z3.PSetPointStep.Dec40.dict
        #  ...

• Reference tracking tests adapt
• Producer files management
• Zone1 PCS's by declared Zone1 management
• Show the producer files used in each test
• Generate command adapt

[jl-marin]

Right off the bat, I suggest one change in naming: ProducerA, ProducerB, etc. ==> Producer_G1, Producer_G2, etc.