[Config #66] create new file #67
Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Abby-Wheelis Do you think these empty values will be okay for the research questions?
| "research_questions": [ | ||
| "Travel behavior using e-bikes?", | ||
| "Barriers to e-bike use and adoption in Southwest DC?", | ||
| "" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it's OK, it could look odd with an empty string plugged into the text, the safest bet might be to just take those out so the list has a length of 2, but I'm not sure it matters. If you test in the devapp you could see how it looks?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In testing, I realized that we are not currently even using the research_questions field in the app:
When compared to why_we_collect:
Pictures of my testing
 |
 |
|---|---|
 |
 |
One thing I noticed, this section is written weirdly:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since these 2 things sort of go together (both are changes that would affect the consent-text.html files, should I put up a PR to fix these 2 things? @shankari how would we want to include the research questions into the consent text?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Which are the two things?
The research questions were in the consent text earlier - you can look at the snapshots back in May to see what the consent looked like then. There is also no consent-text.html any more so I am not sure what this means.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@shankari To answer your question about which are the two things:
Put the research questions somewhere in the Privacy Policy screen on the appMe and @Abby-Wheelis met today and decided that this change is unnecessary for 2 reasons: (1) theresearch_questionsfield in the config, while is not being used in the app, is being used in the program join pages, and (2) the Privacy policy on the app is already long enough, adding more to it would just muddle it further- The textual glitch I showed in my screenshots on the Privacy policy screen above:
"Program Administrators from Energy Administration at District of Colombia Department of Energy and Environment to , and NREL OpenPATH developers for debugging"@Abby-Wheelis 's phone on the production version of NREL-commute is not showing this, but there are emojis there, so this could be a regression from my accessibility changes. I am looking into why my emulator is showing this way
| "research_questions": [ | ||
| "¿Comportamiento de viaje con bicicletas eléctricas?", | ||
| "¿Barreras para el uso y la adopción de bicicletas eléctricas en el suroeste de DC?", | ||
| "" |
|
@jgu2 for visibility |
Adding a new config file