Skip to content

Conversation

Leguark
Copy link
Member

@Leguark Leguark commented Aug 11, 2025

Description

Please include a summary of the changes.

Relates to

Checklist

  • My code uses type hinting for function and method arguments and return values.
  • I have created tests which cover my code.
  • The test code either 1. demonstrates at least one valuable use case (e.g. integration tests)
    or 2. verifies that outputs are as expected for given inputs (e.g. unit tests).
  • New tests pass locally with my changes.

Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Graphite Automations

"Add gempy label" took an action on this PR • (09/25/25)

1 label was added to this PR based on Miguel de la Varga's automation.

@Leguark Leguark changed the base branch from cg_solver to graphite-base/1049 September 25, 2025 12:50
@Leguark Leguark force-pushed the changes_for_server_I branch from 0d7c62b to b194a5e Compare September 29, 2025 14:13
@Leguark Leguark changed the base branch from graphite-base/1049 to cg_solver September 29, 2025 14:13
@Leguark Leguark force-pushed the changes_for_server_I branch from b194a5e to 0554b52 Compare September 30, 2025 06:43
Copy link
Member Author

Leguark commented Sep 30, 2025

Merge activity

@Leguark Leguark changed the base branch from cg_solver to graphite-base/1049 September 30, 2025 08:15
@Leguark Leguark force-pushed the changes_for_server_I branch from 0554b52 to 2dea909 Compare September 30, 2025 08:15
@graphite-app graphite-app bot changed the base branch from graphite-base/1049 to main September 30, 2025 08:16
@Leguark Leguark force-pushed the changes_for_server_I branch from 2dea909 to e3cd247 Compare September 30, 2025 08:16
@Leguark Leguark merged commit 436f0f9 into main Sep 30, 2025
2 checks passed
@Leguark Leguark deleted the changes_for_server_I branch September 30, 2025 08:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
gempy 3 Will come with the next major update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant