Skip to content

Conversation

@KommuSoft
Copy link
Member

@KommuSoft KommuSoft commented May 17, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated the .gitignore file to exclude files with the .proofread extension.
  • Documentation

    • Improved clarity and corrected minor phrasing issues in documentation for better readability.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The updates include an addition to the .gitignore file to exclude .proofread files and a series of minor wording and typographical corrections in a documentation file about GET requests with side effects. No changes were made to any code or exported/public entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.gitignore Added a new ignore pattern for .proofread files under a new "# proofreads" comment section.
antipattern/a-get-request-with-side-effects.md Corrected typos and improved phrasing for clarity and precision without altering technical meaning.

Poem

In the warren, neat and tight,
We proofread files out of sight.
Typos fixed and words refined,
Our garden’s tidy, well-aligned.
With every hop, we keep it clean—
Ignore the fluff, let code be seen!
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
antipattern/a-get-request-with-side-effects.md (2)

20-20: Remove comma before “because” for clarity
The comma before “because” is unnecessary and can interrupt the flow of the sentence. Consider:

-This is a problem, because this violates the HTTP standard, specifically the section on [*safe methods* of the HTTP specifications  …]
+This is a problem because this violates the HTTP standard, specifically the section on [*safe methods* of the HTTP specifications  …]
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[formatting] ~20-~20: If the ‘because’ clause is essential to the meaning, do not use a comma before the clause.
Context: ... Why is it a problem? This is a problem, because this violates the HTTP standard, specif...

(COMMA_BEFORE_BECAUSE)


36-36: Approve “provide” over “offer” and hyphenation
The switch to “does not provide security mechanisms like a CSRF-token” sharpens the language. Optionally, for consistency with common usage, consider “CSRF token” without the hyphen.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 08dbda1 and 7ecf576.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • antipattern/a-get-request-with-side-effects.md (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
antipattern/a-get-request-with-side-effects.md

[formatting] ~20-~20: If the ‘because’ clause is essential to the meaning, do not use a comma before the clause.
Context: ... Why is it a problem? This is a problem, because this violates the HTTP standard, specif...

(COMMA_BEFORE_BECAUSE)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Build site
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.gitignore (1)

7-8: Add proofreads ignore rule
The new # proofreads section and *.proofread pattern correctly exclude intermediate proofreading artifacts from version control.

antipattern/a-get-request-with-side-effects.md (2)

10-10: Approve refined example introduction
The updated phrasing “Often people construct views that have side effects, for example:” clearly introduces the code snippet.


32-32: Approve wording update to “response”
Changing “the page that is returned” to “the response” improves precision and aligns with HTTP terminology.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant