perf: paginate API calls #1332
perf: paginate API calls #1332
Conversation
Utter wasteland of a commit, will rewrite using cleaner patterns.
ab-smith
changed the title
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
WalkthroughThe changes update pagination settings and ordering mechanisms in backend configurations and enhance frontend components with new server-side rendering features. Environment variables for pagination are now cast to integers, and the REST framework’s pagination class is switched to Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant MT as ModelTable Component
participant DH as DataHandler
participant API as Backend API
U->>MT: Triggers sort/search/pagination
MT->>DH: Call handler.sort()/search() / setPage()
DH->>DH: Prepare query parameters (pagination, filter, sort)
DH->>API: Fetch table data with constructed params
API-->>DH: Return JSON data response
DH->>MT: Update table data state
MT->>U: Re-render table with updated data
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (10)
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RemoteModelTable.svelte (4)
29-38: Consider consolidating multiple boolean props into a configuration object.Currently, there are many boolean props controlling aspects such as
interactive,search,rowsPerPage,rowCount, etc. Grouping them into a single configuration object or a smaller set of logically-related props can streamline usage and reduce prop clutter.
56-77: Combine row click and keydown handlers to reduce duplication.Both
onRowClickandonRowKeydownshare similar logic for navigating to detail pages. Consider merging them into a unified, reusable function (with a parameter specifying if the call originated from a mouse or keyboard event), improving maintainability.
193-220: Extract the array rendering logic into a helper component or function to improve readability.The block that handles rendering arrays (lines 202-222) is quite extensive, containing multiple conditionals and nested loops. Moving it into a dedicated helper function or a child component will clarify the main table rendering flow and make testing easier.
329-336: Consider pagination performance for large datasets.While the
Paginationcomponent and remote handler are used, extremely large datasets might benefit from server-side filtering and dynamic loading. Evaluate whether chunked/lazy loading is necessary to prevent performance bottlenecks and memory overhead.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte (2)
8-10: Use a more descriptive placeholder for undefined row counts.Rendering an empty
<div />could be confusing for keyboard or screen-reader users. Instead, consider using a visually hidden accessibility message (e.g., "Loading row count" or "Row count unavailable").
12-16: Clarify the zero-count scenario to end users.When
$rowCount?.totalis0, the component displays "no entries found". In some edge cases (e.g., filtered results), ensure the end user clearly understands that there is no matching data, rather than a loading or retrieval failure.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts (1)
33-46: Uncomment and implement search and filter functionality.The search and filter functionality is commented out. Consider implementing these features to provide a complete table experience.
Would you like me to help implement the search and filter functionality? I can provide a complete implementation that integrates with the backend API.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (2)
16-16: Remove debug console.log statement.Debug console.log statements should not be committed to production code.
-$: console.log('$pages', $pages);
18-22: Consider adding loading state during navigation.The
afterNavigatehook resets the page, but there's no indication to the user that the table is reloading.Consider adding a loading state:
afterNavigate(() => { if ($page.url) { + handler.setLoading(true); handler.setPage(1); + handler.invalidate().finally(() => { + handler.setLoading(false); + }); } });backend/ciso_assistant/settings.py (1)
127-127: Consider reducing the default pagination size.The default value of 5000 items per page is quite high and could impact performance. Consider reducing this to a more reasonable default (e.g., 100-500) to:
- Reduce initial load time
- Decrease memory usage
- Improve response times
-PAGINATE_BY = int(os.environ.get("PAGINATE_BY", default=5000)) +PAGINATE_BY = int(os.environ.get("PAGINATE_BY", default=100))
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
backend/ciso_assistant/settings.py(2 hunks)enterprise/backend/enterprise_core/settings.py(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RemoteModelTable.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RemoteModelTable.svelte (2)
275-310: Ensure the custom actions slot covers all key security and concurrency concerns.The
<TableRowActions>usage is flexible, but verifying that each row's action permissions and concurrency conditions (e.g., multi-user editing or row lock scenarios) are handled robustly can prevent potential data corruption or unauthorized edits.
127-128: Verify the null/undefined checks when referencingrow.meta.In
preventDeleteand elsewhere, references torow.metaare common. Ifrow.metais missing or undefined due to upstream changes, this could throw an error. Ensure thatrow.metais a defined object before attempting property access.✅ Verification successful
The code has proper null/undefined checks for
row.metaaccessThe implementation includes multiple layers of protection:
- Object.hasOwn() checks before accessing critical properties
- Optional chaining (?.) for nullable fields
- Guaranteed meta initialization with undefined fallback
- Meta object access with row fallback
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Looking for usage of row.meta to ensure that it's checked or guaranteed to exist rg "row\.meta" -A 3 | rg -B 3 -A 3 "if|else|Object\.hasOwn"Length of output: 5984
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for type definitions and interfaces related to row/meta ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { meta: $_ }' # Look for where row data is constructed rg "row.*=.*{.*meta.*}" -A 3Length of output: 191
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for TypeScript type definitions and interfaces fd "\.(ts|d\.ts)$" | xargs rg "type.*Row|interface.*Row" -A 5 # Look for component props and row type usage rg "export let row" -A 2 # Look for meta object construction with proper escaping rg "row\s*=\s*\{" -A 3Length of output: 1750
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for table data population and row structure rg "let rows\s*=|rows\s*=" -A 3 # Check the table component implementation fd "Table.*svelte$" | xargs cat # Look for data fetching or row creation rg "createRows|getRows|fetchRows" -A 3Length of output: 33843
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte (1)
9-11: Verify page handling logic after commenting out pagination updates.By disabling auto-adjustment (
handler.setPage(...)), users could potentially remain on an out-of-range page. Confirm that this cannot happen or that other checks exist to reset the page in these boundary conditions.✅ Verification successful
Pagination boundary checks are properly handled elsewhere
The commented-out code can be safely removed as the Pagination component already enforces valid page boundaries through:
- Disabled states for previous/next buttons at page limits
- Constrained page selection via handler.getPages()
- Automatic reset to page 1 during navigation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm no page-out-of-range logic is required in the rest of the code after removing setPage() rg -A 3 "setPage"Length of output: 2350
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check handler implementation and store management ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ { $$$ setPage($_) { $$$ } $$$ }' # Look for page number validation rg -A 5 "pageNumber|pages" frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Length of output: 3193
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte (2)
9-13: Encapsulation of sort logic improves code organization.The introduction of the
updatefunction improves code organization by encapsulating the sorting logic and handler invalidation in a single place.
17-18: Verify sort direction indicators in the UI.The class bindings for sort direction indicators have been updated. Please ensure that the ascending and descending arrows are displayed correctly when sorting is applied.
Run this script to check the sort direction implementation across the codebase:
Also applies to: 26-27
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (1)
12-15: LGTM: Improved page setting logic.The new
setPagefunction properly encapsulates the page setting logic and handler invalidation.frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte (1)
5-5: Verify RemoteModelTable compatibility with existing features.The switch to RemoteModelTable should maintain compatibility with existing features like the add button, export functionality, and graph visualization.
Run this script to verify the component's interface:
✅ Verification successful
RemoteModelTable maintains full compatibility with existing features
The component implements all required functionality:
- Add button support via
addButtonslot (respects permissions)- Export functionality via
optButtonslot- Custom actions and visualizations through
field_component_map- Full pagination and search capabilities
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if RemoteModelTable implements all required props and slots ast-grep --pattern 'export let $prop' frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RemoteModelTable.svelte echo "Checking slot definitions..." ast-grep --pattern '<slot $$$name$$$>' frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RemoteModelTable.svelteLength of output: 273
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First verify the file exists and show its content echo "Checking file existence and content:" cat frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RemoteModelTable.svelte echo -e "\nChecking exported props:" ast-grep --pattern 'export let' echo -e "\nChecking slot definitions:" ast-grep --pattern '<slot'Length of output: 12209
backend/ciso_assistant/settings.py (1)
214-214: LGTM! Good choice of pagination strategy.Switching to
LimitOffsetPaginationis a good choice for improving performance as it:
- Provides better handling of large datasets
- Allows more efficient database queries
- Enables cursor-based navigation through results
enterprise/backend/enterprise_core/settings.py (2)
130-130: Consider reducing the default pagination size (enterprise).Similar to the community version, the default value of 5000 items per page is quite high. Consider reducing this to maintain consistency with the recommended changes in the community version.
217-217: LGTM! Consistent pagination strategy with community version.The switch to
LimitOffsetPaginationmaintains consistency with the community version while providing the same performance benefits.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (1)
Line range hint
185-196: LGTM! Well-implemented filter tracking.The implementation:
- Properly tracks active filters using reactive statements
- Efficiently calculates filter count
- Uses appropriate TypeScript typing
- Follows Svelte's reactive programming patterns
Note: While this change doesn't directly relate to the pagination changes, it complements them by providing better control over the displayed data.
nas-tabchiche
changed the title
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Nitpick comments (22)
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte (2)
Line range hint
1-5: Consider using a reactive declaration for rowCount.The current implementation retrieves the row count once during initialization. To ensure the count stays in sync with the handler's state, consider using a reactive declaration.
-const rowCount = handler.getRowCount(); +$: rowCount = handler.getRowCount();
8-10: Consider removing or improving the empty div placeholder.The empty
<div />placeholder could be either removed entirely (if the parent layout doesn't depend on it) or replaced with a more semantic element that indicates loading/processing state.-{#if $rowCount === undefined} - <div /> -{:else} +{#if $rowCount !== undefined} <aside class="text-sm"> {#if $rowCount?.total > 0} {m.rowCount({ start: $rowCount.start, end: $rowCount.end, total: $rowCount.total })} {:else} {m.noEntriesFound()} {/if} </aside> {/if}frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (2)
Line range hint
185-195: Consider handling additional filter value types.The filter counting logic assumes all filter values are arrays. Consider handling other potential filter value types for better robustness.
function getFilterCount(filters: typeof $_filters): number { return Object.values(filters).reduce((acc, filter) => { - if (Array.isArray(filter.value) && filter.value.length > 0) { + if (!filter.value) return acc; + if (Array.isArray(filter.value)) { + return filter.value.length > 0 ? acc + 1 : acc; + } + // Handle non-array filter values (e.g., single value filters) + if (filter.value !== undefined && filter.value !== null) { return acc + 1; } return acc; }, 0); }
185-187: Add JSDoc documentation for the filter-related code.Consider adding documentation to explain:
- The structure of filter values
- The relationship between
_filtersand the DataHandler- Expected filter value types
+/** Stores the current state of all active filters from the DataHandler */ const _filters = handler.getFilters(); +/** + * Calculates the total number of active filters + * @param filters - The current filter state from DataHandler + * @returns The count of active filters + */ function getFilterCount(filters: typeof $_filters): number {frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/ThFilter.svelte (2)
1-7: Add type safety improvements and proper class handling.Consider these improvements for better type safety and class handling:
- Add type for the
valuevariable- Add runtime validation for the required
handlerprop- Consider using the Svelte class directive instead of a manual class property
<script lang="ts"> import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables'; export let handler: DataHandler; export let filterBy = ''; - let value = ''; - let classProp = ''; // Replacing $$props.class + let value: string = ''; + $: if (!handler) { + throw new Error('ThFilter component requires a handler prop'); + } </script>
1-17: Consider additional features for better UX.The filter component could benefit from these enhancements:
- Add a clear button to reset the filter
- Show visual feedback when the filter is active
- Handle and display filter operation errors
- Consider adding filter presets for common use cases
These improvements would make the filtering functionality more robust and user-friendly.
Would you like me to provide an implementation example for any of these features?
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/Th.svelte (3)
7-7: Simplify the identifier assignment.The optional chaining operator (
?.) is unnecessary here sinceorderByis initialized as a string.-const identifier = orderBy?.toString(); +const identifier = orderBy.toString();
3-5: Add type safety for component props.Consider adding type constraints and validation for the props to ensure type safety.
-export let handler: DataHandler; -export let orderBy = ''; +export let handler: DataHandler; +export let orderBy: string = ''; + +$: if (!handler) { + throw new Error('DataHandler is required'); +}
32-53: Enhance sort indicator styles for better user experience.Consider adding smooth transitions and using CSS custom properties for better maintainability.
<style> + th { + transition: background-color 0.2s ease; + } th span:before, th span:after { border: 4px solid transparent; content: ''; display: block; height: 0; width: 0; + transition: border-color 0.2s ease; } th span:before { @apply border-b-surface-200 mt-0.5; } th span:after { @apply border-t-surface-200 mt-0.5; } th.active span.asc:before { @apply border-b-surface-700; } th.active span.desc:after { @apply border-t-surface-700; } </style>frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/RowsPerPage.svelte (2)
5-7: Consider making the options array configurable via props.While the current fixed options
[5, 10, 20, 50, 100]are reasonable defaults, consider making this configurable to accommodate different use cases.<script lang="ts"> import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables'; import * as m from '$paraglide/messages'; export let handler: DataHandler; + export let rowsPerPageOptions = [5, 10, 20, 50, 100]; const rowsPerPage = handler.getRowsPerPage(); - const options = [5, 10, 20, 50, 100]; + const options = rowsPerPageOptions;
19-33: Add accessibility attributes to improve user experience.While the template implementation is clean, it could benefit from additional accessibility attributes:
<aside class="flex items-center"> {m.show()} <select class="select bg-surface-50 w-fit mx-1" bind:value={$rowsPerPage} on:change={setRowsPerPage} + aria-label={m.show()} + role="combobox" > {#each options as option} <option value={option}> {option} </option> {/each} </select> {m.entries()} </aside>frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/RowCount.svelte (2)
1-6: Add type safety and error handling.While the basic TypeScript setup is good, consider these improvements:
- Add error handling for
getRowCount()- Add type checking for the messages import
- Add initialization check for the handler prop
<script lang="ts"> import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables'; - import * as m from '$paraglide/messages'; + import type { Messages } from '$paraglide/messages'; + import * as m from '$paraglide/messages'; export let handler: DataHandler; + $: if (!handler) { + console.error('Handler is required for RowCount component'); + } const rowCount = handler.getRowCount(); </script>
8-18: Enhance UX and accessibility.Consider these improvements:
- Add proper ARIA attributes for screen readers
- Include loading and error states
- Replace empty div with a more semantic placeholder
-{#if $rowCount === undefined} - <div /> +{#if $rowCount === undefined} + <aside class="text-sm" aria-hidden="true"> + <span class="animate-pulse">Loading...</span> + </aside> {:else} - <aside class="text-sm"> + <aside class="text-sm" role="status" aria-live="polite"> {#if $rowCount?.total > 0} {m.rowCount({ start: $rowCount.start, end: $rowCount.end, total: $rowCount.total })} {:else} {m.noEntriesFound()} {/if} </aside> {/if}frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/ModelTable.svelte (3)
70-74: Refine detailQueryParameter setting.
The current approach appends a “?” if the parameter is defined, which is fine but can lead to confusion if we need multiple query parameters or more robust query strings in the future.Consider using a utility function or a more flexible approach (e.g., URLSearchParams) to handle a variety of query parameters consistently.
239-241: Expand date detection beyond hardcoded fields.
You are checking for ISO-8601 strings specifically in fields likecreated_at,updated_at, and a few others. If additional date/time fields are added later, they would be missed by this conditional.Propose moving date detection logic into a more generic utility function that can dynamically detect or handle newly introduced date fields.
248-256: Avoid embedding domain-specific logic in a generic table.
Lines 248-256 introduce special styling for'risk-acceptances'. While it addresses an immediate need, it couples domain logic with a generally reusable component.Consider delegating domain-specific styling or logic to a higher-level wrapper or a custom cell renderer so that
ModelTablecan remain as generic as possible.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (1)
7-15: Use a more precise type thananyfortimeout.
Usinganyis convenient, but it can obscure potential timing or scope issues.- let timeout: any; + let timeout: ReturnType<typeof setTimeout> | undefined;Additionally, you might want to clean up the timeout on component teardown to prevent lingering callbacks:
import { onDestroy } from 'svelte'; onDestroy(() => { clearTimeout(timeout); });frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (3)
16-16: Remove debug console.log statement.Debug logging should not be present in production code.
-$: console.log('$pages', $pages);
Line range hint
1-52: Consider consolidating duplicate pagination components.This component shares identical code with
server/Pagination.svelte. Consider consolidating these components to avoid code duplication and maintenance overhead.
12-15: Add error handling for invalid page values.The
setPagefunction should validate the page number to prevent potential issues with invalid values.const setPage = (value: 'previous' | 'next' | number) => { + if (typeof value === 'number' && (value < 1 || value > $pageCount)) { + return; + } handler.setPage(value); handler.invalidate(); };backend/core/views.py (1)
128-128: Consider security and performance implications of allowing ordering by all fields.While
ordering_fields = "__all__"provides flexibility, it could:
- Impact performance when ordering by fields without database indexes
- Expose sensitive data through ordering operations
- Increase database load with complex ordering queries
Consider explicitly listing only the necessary orderable fields.
- ordering_fields = "__all__" + ordering_fields = [ + "created_at", + "updated_at", + "name", + "description" + # Add other specific fields that need ordering + ]frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RemoteModelTable.svelte (1)
187-323: Consider performance optimization for large datasets.The table body rendering includes multiple nested loops and conditional checks that could impact performance with large datasets.
Consider:
- Implementing virtual scrolling for large datasets
- Memoizing complex computations
- Using
{#key}blocks to optimize re-rendersExample implementation:
// Add these reactive statements $: memoizedRows = $rows; $: visibleRows = memoizedRows.slice(startIndex, endIndex); // Update the template to use virtualized rows {#each visibleRows as row, rowIndex (row.meta[identifierField])} {#key row.meta[identifierField]} <!-- Row content --> {/key} {/each}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
backend/ciso_assistant/settings.py(2 hunks)backend/core/views.py(2 hunks)enterprise/backend/enterprise_core/settings.py(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RemoteModelTable.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/ModelTable.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/Pagination.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/RowCount.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/RowsPerPage.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/Search.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/Th.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/ThFilter.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/handler.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/analytics/ComposerSelect.svelte(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
- GitHub Check: startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: build (3.12)
🔇 Additional comments (20)
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte (1)
12-16: Well-structured conditional rendering with i18n support!The implementation properly handles the row count states while maintaining internationalization support. The use of optional chaining (
?.) for safe property access is a good practice.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (1)
Line range hint
290-294: LGTM! Clean implementation of the filter count badge.The badge implementation follows good practices for accessibility and user experience:
- Conditional rendering based on filterCount
- Proper positioning relative to the filter button
- Clear visual feedback for active filters
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/Th.svelte (1)
1-53: Well-structured component with good separation of concerns!The component is well-implemented with clear separation of script, template, and styles. It effectively integrates with the DataHandler for sorting functionality while maintaining a clean and focused implementation.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte (3)
9-12: LGTM! Clean implementation of rows per page handling.The
setRowsPerPagefunction follows good practices by:
- Resetting to the first page when changing page size
- Triggering a re-render via
invalidate()
21-25: LGTM! Good use of Svelte bindings and event handling.The select element implementation correctly uses:
- Two-way binding with
bind:value- Event handling with
on:change
6-6: Verify pagination edge cases after removing automatic page adjustment.The removal of row count tracking and automatic page adjustment could lead to edge cases where the current page becomes invalid after changing the rows per page. Please ensure these scenarios are handled appropriately elsewhere in the codebase.
Also applies to: 14-16
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/RowsPerPage.svelte (3)
1-4: LGTM! Clean TypeScript setup with proper type definitions.The component follows TypeScript best practices with proper type imports and export declarations.
9-12: LGTM! Proper handler implementation.The
setRowsPerPagefunction correctly handles page reset and invalidation when changing the number of rows per page.
6-6: Clarify the status of the commented-out row count logic.The commented-out row count initialization suggests incomplete or removed pagination logic. Please clarify if this is intentional or if it needs to be implemented.
✅ Verification successful
Commented-out row count logic is intentionally removed
The commented-out code was for an edge case in pagination handling. The component remains fully functional without it, as:
- Core rows-per-page functionality is handled by the remaining code
- Row count display is managed separately by the RowCount component
- Basic page reset is still implemented in the setRowsPerPage function
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other components that might be handling row count logic rg -l "rowCount" frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Length of output: 480
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check implementation in server components echo "=== Server RowCount.svelte ===" cat frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/RowCount.svelte echo -e "\n=== Server ModelTable.svelte rowCount usage ===" rg "rowCount" frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/ModelTable.svelte -C 2 echo -e "\n=== Server RowsPerPage.svelte full file ===" cat frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/RowsPerPage.svelteLength of output: 2043
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/RowCount.svelte (1)
1-18: Verify integration with ModelTable system.Please ensure:
- The component properly integrates with the parent ModelTable component
- The row count updates are synchronized with other pagination components
- The messaging format is consistent across all table components
✅ Verification successful
Integration with ModelTable system verified successfully
The RowCount component properly integrates with the ModelTable system, using consistent patterns for handler prop usage, message formatting, and data synchronization. The implementation aligns with other pagination components and follows the established patterns across the table system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for consistent usage patterns across table components echo "Checking component integration patterns..." # Find all related table components fd -e svelte . frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server # Check for consistent message usage rg "from '\$paraglide/messages'" frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server # Verify handler prop usage ast-grep --pattern 'export let handler: DataHandler'Length of output: 731
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check handler usage and data flow patterns echo "Checking ModelTable integration patterns..." # Check handler prop usage in ModelTable ast-grep --pattern 'import type { DataHandler } from "@vincjo/datatables"' # Examine ModelTable component implementation cat frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/ModelTable.svelte # Check message usage in pagination components cat frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/Pagination.svelteLength of output: 13947
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Final verification of RowsPerPage integration cat frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/RowsPerPage.svelte # Check message usage consistency rg "import \* as m from '\$paraglide/messages'" frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/RowsPerPage.svelteLength of output: 986
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/ModelTable.svelte (1)
47-61: Ensure robust handling ofrowMetaData.
Here,onRowClickaccesses$rows[rowIndex].metaand uses fields likerowMetaData[identifierField]. Although there's a fallback in the template logic, an undefined or nullmetacould slip through in edge cases (e.g., unusual data states or future expansions).Consider adding additional null checks (or a typed guard) for
rowMetaDatato prevent potential runtime errors ifmetais ever missing.frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+server.ts (1)
Line range hint
15-21: Verify that all consumers handle the full response object correctly.The endpoint now returns the complete response object instead of extracting just the
results. While this change supports pagination by preserving metadata likecount, ensure all consumers are updated to handle this new format.Run this script to find potential consumers that might expect the old format:
✅ Verification successful
The response format change is safe to proceed with
The codebase consistently handles paginated responses by explicitly extracting the
.resultsproperty where needed, primarily in server-side code. The change to return the full response object aligns with proper pagination support while maintaining compatibility with existing consumers.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for direct fetch calls to this endpoint and .results access rg -l "fetch\(['\"]\/[^'\"]*\/" | xargs rg "\.results"Length of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for fetch calls to model endpoints and response handling rg -A 5 "fetch\(.*model.*\)" # Also search for any .results property access patterns rg -A 3 "\.results\b"Length of output: 40106
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte (1)
9-13: LGTM! Good encapsulation of sort functionality.The introduction of the
updatefunction improves code organization by encapsulating sort logic and ensuring proper invalidation of the handler.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/Pagination.svelte (1)
1-97: Duplicate component detected.This component is identical to
ModelTable/Pagination.svelte. Please refer to the comments on that file regarding consolidation.enterprise/backend/enterprise_core/settings.py (2)
130-130: LGTM! Type safety improvement for PAGINATE_BY.Converting the environment variable to integer prevents potential type-related issues.
217-217: Verify the impact of pagination class change.Switching from PageNumberPagination to LimitOffsetPagination changes how clients should handle pagination. Ensure all API clients are updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
No impact on API clients - frontend already uses limit/offset pagination
The change from PageNumberPagination to LimitOffsetPagination is safe because:
- Frontend code already uses limit/offset parameters for pagination
- No page number based pagination found in API requests
- Server-side handler properly constructs pagination using offset and limit parameters
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for pagination-related API calls in frontend code rg -t js -t ts -t svelte 'page=' frontend/ rg -t js -t ts -t svelte 'limit=' frontend/Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for pagination-related patterns in the codebase echo "=== Searching for page-based pagination patterns ===" rg -g '!*.{pyc,min.js}' -i 'page(_size|number|\s*=|":)' echo -e "\n=== Searching for limit-based pagination patterns ===" rg -g '!*.{pyc,min.js}' -i '(limit|offset)(\s*=|":)' echo -e "\n=== Searching for pagination response handling ===" rg -g '!*.{pyc,min.js}' '(next_page|previous_page|results)(\s*=|":)' echo -e "\n=== Checking API client configurations ===" rg -g '!*.{pyc,min.js}' 'pagination' -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 73265
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for API client configurations and network requests echo "=== Searching for API client configurations ===" rg -g '!*.{pyc,min.js}' 'axios|fetch' -A 3 -B 3 echo -e "\n=== Searching for pagination parameters in requests ===" rg -g '!*.{pyc,min.js}' '(page|limit|offset).*params' echo -e "\n=== Checking pagination component implementations ===" rg -g '!*.{pyc,min.js}' 'class="pagination|Pagination.svelte' -A 5 -B 5 echo -e "\n=== Searching for REST framework pagination imports/usage ===" rg -g '!*.{pyc,min.js}' 'from rest_framework.pagination import|PageNumberPagination|LimitOffsetPagination'Length of output: 67527
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for pagination-related code echo "=== Searching for pagination parameter handling ===" rg -g '!*.{pyc,min.js}' 'params.*page|params.*limit|params.*offset' echo -e "\n=== Searching for pagination response handling ===" rg -g '!*.{pyc,min.js}' 'results.*pagination|next.*previous' echo -e "\n=== Checking pagination component implementations ===" rg -g '!*.{pyc,min.js}' -A 10 -B 10 'class.*Pagination|export.*function.*pagination' echo -e "\n=== Checking REST framework pagination configuration ===" rg -g '!*.{pyc,min.js}' 'DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS|PAGE_SIZE|PAGINATE_BY'Length of output: 66788
backend/ciso_assistant/settings.py (1)
130-130: LGTM! Consistent pagination configuration.The changes maintain consistency with enterprise_core/settings.py, ensuring uniform pagination behavior across the application.
Also applies to: 217-217
backend/core/views.py (1)
3690-3690: LGTM! Improved search functionality through related fields.The search fields now correctly reference the related requirement's name and description, enabling more intuitive search functionality.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RemoteModelTable.svelte (2)
56-77: LGTM! Well-implemented keyboard accessibility.The component properly handles both click and keyboard events for row interactions, following accessibility best practices.
117-117:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for data loading operations.
The data loading call lacks error handling which could lead to silent failures.
- handler.onChange((state: State) => loadTableData(state, URLModel, `/${URLModel}`)); + handler.onChange(async (state: State) => { + try { + return await loadTableData(state, URLModel, `/${URLModel}`); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to load table data:', error); + // Add user notification here + throw error; + } + });Likely invalid or redundant comment.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/RowsPerPage.svelte
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/server/ModelTable.svelte
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
nas-tabchiche
force-pushed
the
CA-582-handle-backend-pagination
branch
from
11d2da4 to
09f720b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts (1)
175-175:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate library references to use the new model names.
The foreign key field references to
librariesshould be updated to eitherstored-librariesorloaded-librariesto maintain consistency with the new model structure.Apply this diff to update the references:
- { field: 'library', urlModel: 'libraries' } + { field: 'library', urlModel: 'stored-libraries' }Also applies to: 537-537
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts (1)
16-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd error handling for the main fetch request.
The fetch request lacks error handling. Consider adding try-catch blocks and proper error responses.
+ try { const res = await event.fetch(endpoint); + if (!res.ok) { + throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data: ${res.statusText}`); + } const data = await res.json(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error fetching data:', error); + throw error; + }frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts (2)
6-9:⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation for route parameters.
The current implementation might be vulnerable to path traversal attacks through unvalidated URL parameters.
Apply this diff to add parameter validation:
export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params }) => { + // Validate model and filter parameters + if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(params.model) || !/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(params.filter)) { + error(400, 'Invalid model or filter parameter'); + } + const model = getModelInfo(params.model); const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl ?? params.model}/${params.filter}/`;
10-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd type safety for response handling.
The response parsing lacks type validation which could lead to runtime errors.
Apply this diff to add type safety:
+interface ApiResponse { + [key: string]: unknown; +} + const res = await fetch(endpoint); if (!res.ok) { error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, await res.json()); } - const optionsResponse = await res.json(); + const optionsResponse = (await res.json()) as ApiResponse; + + // Validate response structure + if (typeof optionsResponse !== 'object' || optionsResponse === null) { + error(500, 'Invalid response format'); + }
🧹 Nitpick comments (19)
frontend/src/params/filters.ts (2)
4-16: Consider caching the filter keys Set for better performance.The current implementation recreates the Set and iterates through listViewFields on every match call. Since listViewFields is likely static, consider memoizing the filter keys.
+const filterKeys = new Set<string>(); + +Object.values(listViewFields).forEach((field) => { + if ('filters' in field && field.filters) { + Object.keys(field.filters).forEach((filterKey) => filterKeys.add(filterKey)); + } +}); + export const match = ((param) => { - const filterKeys = new Set<string>(); - - Object.values(listViewFields).forEach((field) => { - if ('filters' in field && field.filters) { - Object.keys(field.filters).forEach((filterKey) => filterKeys.add(filterKey)); - } - }); - // Example output: ["folder", "lc_status", "filtering_labels"] return filterKeys.has(param.toLowerCase().replace(/-/g, '_')); }) satisfies ParamMatcher;
4-16: Add JSDoc documentation and type safety improvements.The function's logic is complex enough to warrant documentation, and the type checking could be more explicit.
+interface FieldWithFilters { + filters?: Record<string, unknown>; +} + +/** + * Matches route parameters against available filter keys. + * Performs case-insensitive matching and normalizes hyphens to underscores. + * + * @param param - The route parameter to match + * @returns boolean - True if the parameter matches a known filter key + */ export const match = ((param) => { const filterKeys = new Set<string>(); Object.values(listViewFields).forEach((field) => { - if ('filters' in field && field.filters) { + const fieldWithFilters = field as FieldWithFilters; + if (fieldWithFilters.filters) { Object.keys(field.filters).forEach((filterKey) => filterKeys.add(filterKey)); } }); // Example output: ["folder", "lc_status", "filtering_labels"] return filterKeys.has(param.toLowerCase().replace(/-/g, '_')); }) satisfies ParamMatcher;frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (1)
7-7: Use a more specific type for the timeout variable.Instead of using
any, consider usingNodeJS.Timeout | undefinedfor better type safety.-let timeout: any; +let timeout: NodeJS.Timeout | undefined;frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (3)
7-7: Clarify optional prop usage.
Thepropsinterface is broad, which is flexible but might lead to misconfigurations if other developers assume certain properties always exist. Consider either making this more strongly typed or documenting it well.
23-26: Localize or standardize "yes" and "no" options if needed.
While these fixed strings may be fine for English-only projects, consider i18n or an enum-based approach to ensure consistent usage throughout the codebase.
272-272: Address theTODO: TEST THISitems.
These items may cause functional gaps or untested paths. If you’d like assistance creating unit or integration tests, let me know!Also applies to: 284-284
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte (1)
17-18: Enhance accessibility and clarity in sorting logic.
Usingaria-sortto reflect ascending/descending states is excellent. For maximum clarity, ensure screen readers receive consistent announcements of sort order changes, e.g., via anaria-liveregion or a visually hidden announcement.Also applies to: 22-26, 32-34
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (2)
339-339: Extract date field check into a separate function.The list of date fields is hardcoded in the condition, making it long and difficult to maintain.
Consider extracting the date field check into a separate function:
+const isDateField = (field: string): boolean => { + const dateFields = ['created_at', 'updated_at', 'expiry_date', 'accepted_at', 'rejected_at', 'revoked_at', 'eta']; + return dateFields.includes(field); +}; + -{:else if ISO_8601_REGEX.test(value) && (key === 'created_at' || key === 'updated_at' || key === 'expiry_date' || key === 'accepted_at' || key === 'rejected_at' || key === 'revoked_at' || key === 'eta')} +{:else if ISO_8601_REGEX.test(value) && isDateField(key)}
273-273: Add type annotation for meta property.The meta property access could be more explicit about its type.
Consider adding a type annotation:
-{@const meta = row?.meta ?? row} +{@const meta = (row?.meta ?? row) as Record<string, unknown>}backend/ebios_rm/views.py (1)
136-143: Consider bulk filtering optimization.With the increased number of filter fields, consider implementing a composite index or query optimization if these fields are frequently used together in filters.
Also applies to: 204-210
backend/library/views.py (3)
1-40: Remove unused imports.The following imports are not used in the code:
rest_framework.viewsetsrest_framework.status.helpers.update_translations_in_objectApply this diff to remove the unused imports:
-from rest_framework import viewsets, status +from rest_framework import status from itertools import chain import json from django.db import IntegrityError from django.db.models import F, Q, IntegerField, OuterRef, Subquery -from .helpers import update_translations, update_translations_in_object +from .helpers import update_translations🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
5-5:
rest_framework.viewsetsimported but unusedRemove unused import
(F401)
5-5:
rest_framework.statusimported but unusedRemove unused import
(F401)
25-25:
.helpers.update_translations_in_objectimported but unusedRemove unused import:
.helpers.update_translations_in_object(F401)
228-232: Fix ambiguous variable names.The variable name
lis ambiguous. Consider using a more descriptive name.Apply this diff to improve readability:
def locale(self, request): locales = set( chain.from_iterable([l.get_locales for l in StoredLibrary.objects.all()]) ) - return Response({l: l for l in locales}) + return Response({locale: locale for locale in locales})🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
230-230: Ambiguous variable name:
l(E741)
232-232: Ambiguous variable name:
l(E741)
239-290: Add documentation for complex query logic.The filter implementation is correct but would benefit from additional documentation explaining:
- The purpose of the
has_updatefilter- The logic behind the version comparison
- The object type filtering approach
Add docstrings to explain the filtering logic:
class LoadedLibraryFilterSet(df.FilterSet): + """FilterSet for LoadedLibrary model with support for object type and update status filtering.""" object_type = df.MultipleChoiceFilter( choices=list(zip(LibraryImporter.OBJECT_FIELDS, LibraryImporter.OBJECT_FIELDS)), method="filter_object_type", ) has_update = df.BooleanFilter(method="filter_has_update") def filter_has_update(self, queryset, name, value): + """ + Filter libraries based on whether they have an update available. + + Args: + queryset: Base queryset to filter + name: Filter name (unused) + value: Boolean indicating whether to filter for libraries with (True) or without (False) updates + + Returns: + Filtered queryset containing only libraries that match the update status criteria + """backend/core/helpers.py (1)
398-410: LGTM! Code simplification.The changes improve code clarity by:
- Removing unnecessary intermediate variable assignments
- Using
list()directly on the querysetFix potential undefined imports.
The
RiskScenariomodel appears to be imported from star imports, which could lead to confusion about where the model is defined.Replace the star import with an explicit import:
-from .models import * +from .models import RiskScenario🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
399-399:
RiskScenariomay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
405-405:
RiskScenariomay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
backend/core/views.py (4)
160-169: Remove commented-out code.The commented-out
filterset_classproperty is not being used. If this code is no longer needed, it should be removed to maintain code cleanliness.- # @property - # def filterset_class(self): - # # If you have defined filterset_fields, build the FilterSet on the fly. - # if self.filterset_fields: - # return filterset_factory( - # model=self.model, - # filterset=GenericFilterSet, - # fields=self.filterset_fields, - # ) - # return None
652-700: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication.The
riskandprobabilitymethods share similar logic for handling undefined values and choices. Consider extracting this common logic into a helper method.def _get_choices_with_undefined(self, data_key: str, undefined_value: str = "--") -> list[dict]: viewable_matrices = RoleAssignment.get_accessible_object_ids( Folder.get_root_folder(), self.request.user, RiskMatrix )[0] undefined = {-1: undefined_value} options = [] for matrix in RiskMatrix.objects.filter(id__in=viewable_matrices): _choices = { i: name for i, name in enumerate( x["name"] for x in matrix.json_definition[data_key] ) } choices = undefined | _choices options = options | choices.items() return [{k: v for k, v in zip(("value", "label"), o)} for o in options]Then use it in the methods:
@action(detail=False, name="Get risk level choices") def risk(self, request): return Response(self._get_choices_with_undefined("risk")) @action(detail=False, name="Get probability choices") def probability(self, request): return Response(self._get_choices_with_undefined("probability"))🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
654-654:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
655-655:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
659-659:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
674-674:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
675-675:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
678-678:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
684-684:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
685-685:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
689-689:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
1199-1205: Consider adding pagination for large datasets.The
owneraction returns all owners of applied controls without pagination. For better performance and resource utilization, consider implementing pagination when the number of owners could be large.@action(detail=False, name="Get all applied controls owners") def owner(self, request): queryset = User.objects.filter(applied_controls__isnull=False) page = self.paginate_queryset(queryset) if page is not None: serializer = UserReadSerializer(page, many=True) return self.get_paginated_response(serializer.data) return Response(UserReadSerializer(queryset, many=True).data)🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
1202-1202:
UserReadSerializermay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
11-11: Remove unused import.The
filterset_factoryimport is not used in the code and should be removed.-from django_filters.filterset import filterset_factory🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
11-11:
django_filters.filterset.filterset_factoryimported but unusedRemove unused import:
django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory(F401)
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (1)
12-15: Good encapsulation of page-change logic.Extracting this into a dedicated
setPagefunction keeps the component more maintainable. Consider logging or handling errors ifhandler.setPagethrows exceptions at run time.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (29)
backend/core/helpers.py(1 hunks)backend/core/migrations/0055_alter_storedlibrary_content.py(1 hunks)backend/core/models.py(4 hunks)backend/core/views.py(11 hunks)backend/ebios_rm/views.py(5 hunks)backend/library/views.py(6 hunks)frontend/messages/en.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/DetailView/DetailView.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte(3 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Form.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte(10 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts(15 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/types.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/params/filters.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte(3 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+page.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/tests/functional/user-route.test.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- frontend/messages/en.json
- backend/core/migrations/0055_alter_storedlibrary_content.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- frontend/src/lib/utils/types.ts
- frontend/src/lib/components/DetailView/DetailView.svelte
- frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/core/helpers.py
399-399: RiskScenario may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
405-405: RiskScenario may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
backend/library/views.py
5-5: rest_framework.viewsets imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
5-5: rest_framework.status imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
25-25: .helpers.update_translations_in_object imported but unused
Remove unused import: .helpers.update_translations_in_object
(F401)
230-230: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
232-232: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
backend/core/views.py
11-11: django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory imported but unused
Remove unused import: django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory
(F401)
295-295: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
299-299: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
308-308: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
654-654: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
655-655: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
659-659: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
674-674: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
675-675: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
678-678: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
684-684: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
685-685: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
689-689: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
1202-1202: UserReadSerializer may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
1911-1911: RiskAcceptance may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (10)
- GitHub Check: startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: build (3.12)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (56)
frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts (1)
14-14: LGTM! Clean and concise endpoint URL construction.The use of the nullish coalescing operator (
??) simplifies the code while maintaining the same functionality.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte (3)
2-2: Update the import path for remote data handling.The import path needs to be updated to match the latest documentation:
- For legacy v1: use
@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote- For v2: use
@vincjo/datatables/serverwithTableHandler
9-16: Well-implemented pagination logic!The implementation correctly handles:
- Page reset when rows per page changes
- Data refresh through handler invalidation
- Edge case where current page becomes invalid
21-25: Clean template implementation!The select element is well-structured with:
- Proper styling using Tailwind classes
- Two-way binding with rowsPerPage
- Event handling for page resets
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte (3)
2-2: Update the Import Path for Remote Data HandlingThe current import path is not aligned with the guidance for remote pagination.
According to the latest documentation for Svelte 4 with server-side pagination, you should import DataHandler from the legacy path:
- import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; + import { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote';Please verify your Svelte version and intended migration strategy:
- If you're using Svelte 4 with server-side pagination, update the import to
@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote.- If you're on Svelte 5, consider switching to
TableHandlerfrom@vincjo/datatables/serveras recommended for new implementations.
13-15: Great job on improving accessibility!The addition of dynamic placeholder text, aria-label, and searchbox role enhances the user experience and accessibility of the filter input.
17-22: Fix potential memory leak in debouncing implementation.The current debouncing implementation may lead to memory leaks as timeouts are created but not properly cleared on subsequent input events.
Apply this diff to properly implement debouncing:
- on:input={() => { - const debounceTimeout = setTimeout(() => { - handler.filter(value, filterBy); - }, 300); - return () => clearTimeout(debounceTimeout); - }} + let debounceTimeout: NodeJS.Timeout; + on:input={() => { + clearTimeout(debounceTimeout); + debounceTimeout = setTimeout(() => { + handler.filter(value, filterBy); + }, 300); + }}frontend/src/params/filters.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM! Appropriate imports for parameter matching.The imports are well-structured, importing the necessary utilities and type definitions from SvelteKit.
frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts (1)
780-787: LGTM! Consistent structure for library components.The changes maintain symmetry between
stored-librariesandloaded-librariesentries, with both having the same component mappings.frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.ts (1)
15-15:❓ Verification inconclusive
LGTM! Good change for supporting pagination.
The modification to preserve the complete API response is essential for pagination support, as it maintains important metadata like total count and page navigation links.
Let's verify the API response structure to ensure it follows standard pagination patterns:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the API response structure for pagination metadata # Note: Using curl instead of internal fetch to demonstrate the expected structure # Get the first page of results curl -s "${BASE_API_URL}/${params.model}?page=1" | jq 'keys' # Verify pagination metadata fields curl -s "${BASE_API_URL}/${params.model}?page=1" | jq '.count, .next, .previous, (.results | length)'Length of output: 318
Approved change for pagination support – Manual Verification Required
The modifications to preserve the entire API response are appropriate for supporting pagination by keeping essential metadata such as total count and navigation links. However, the automated verification script encountered variable substitution errors (e.g., with
${BASE_API_URL}and${params.model}). This indicates that the test environment may not have the correct setup for these variables. Please verify manually that the API returns the expected pagination structure (including.count,.next,.previous, and.results).
- File to review:
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.ts- Action: Ensure that environment variables for
BASE_API_URLandparams.modelare correctly set during local testing or update the script accordingly.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (3)
9-15: Well-implemented debouncing pattern!The search implementation effectively balances user feedback and performance:
- Immediate search feedback
- Debounced server invalidation to reduce load
- Clean timeout handling
18-25: Clean input implementation with good accessibility.The input element follows best practices with:
- Proper two-way binding
- Accessibility attributes
- Clean event handling
1-25:✅ Verification successful
Verify integration with pagination components.
Since this is part of a broader change to pagination handling, please verify that the search debouncing works correctly with the pagination state updates.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for related pagination components and their interaction rg -A 5 "import.*DataHandler.*from.*@vincjo/datatables/remote" frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Length of output: 4068
Pagination integration verified; debouncing behavior appears consistent.
The debounced search mechanism—calling
handler.search(value)immediately and then triggeringhandler.invalidate()after 400 ms—is in line with our ModelTable components (e.g., Pagination.svelte and RowCount.svelte) that share the sameDataHandlerintegration pattern. This implementation should correctly update the pagination state upon search input changes. Please confirm in your local testing that pagination resets or updates as expected after a search.frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM! Well-structured imports with proper type safety.The imports are appropriate and demonstrate good practices by leveraging TypeScript's type system.
frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (4)
1-3: Prefer checking ifAutocompleteSelectusage is consistent with your forms library.
Thanks for adding these imports. Ensure thatAutocompleteSelectprovides all the needed functionalities (async data loading, multi-selection, etc.) and thatOptionfromsvelte-multiselectdoes not conflict with it.Would you like me to generate a script to analyze all the usages of
AutocompleteSelectto confirm consistent behavior?
18-18: Ensure undefined filters are handled gracefully.
This index signature allows forundefinedfilter definitions. Verify that the UI or filter logic doesn’t break when encountering an undefined filter.
28-359: Refactor repeated ‘AutocompleteSelect’ filter definitions with a helper or factory.
This file contains numerous filter objects that share the same properties (e.g.,component: AutocompleteSelect,optionsEndpoint,multiple). Repeated code can lead to inconsistencies if changes are needed in all these filters in the future.Also applies to: 369-399, 401-580, 582-826
829-834: Validate edge cases inFilterKeysmapped type.
Mapping overlistViewFieldsis clever, but if a particular table config lacksfiltersor if keys are declared asundefined, you may encounter unexpected type expansions. Consider adding constraints to ensure correctness.frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts (1)
6-24: Revisit error handling and URL parameter validation.
Directly forwardingurl.searchParamsand returning the backend’s JSON error may expose sensitive information. Additionally, validating and sanitizing parameters can avoid potential security issues.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte (2)
2-2: Confirm that@vincjo/datatables/remoteis installed and declared.
If@vincjo/datatableswas replaced by@vincjo/datatables/remote, ensure this new import is properly installed in your package.json. Otherwise, the build may fail.
8-13: Ensure robust sort handling and potential fallback.
Fetching current sort state withhandler.getSort()is a neat approach. Consider a fallback scenario ifgetSort()returns null or an unexpected structure.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts (7)
7-30: Add error handling for fetch operations.The
loadTableDatafunction should handle potential fetch errors and API response errors.
11-11: Add null check for response.results.The code assumes
response.resultsexists without validation.
27-29: Improve type safety and null checks.The current implementation has two issues:
- Using
Record<string, any>could be more specific- The optional chaining on
table?.meta?.resultssuggests potential null values, but the type definition doesn't reflect this
34-35: Fix incorrect nullish coalescing operator usage.The nullish coalescing operator is unnecessary here as
toString()will never return null/undefined.
32-55: Validate numeric parameters.The offset and limit values should be validated to ensure they are positive numbers.
46-48: Sanitize parameter values.Filter values are directly appended to URL parameters without sanitization, which could lead to XSS attacks.
Also applies to: 50-51
40-40: Validate sort direction values.The sort direction should be validated to prevent invalid values.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (4)
107-126: Add error handling for DataHandler initialization.The DataHandler initialization and onChange callback lack error handling.
136-141: RevisitpreventDeletelogic for clarity and maintainability.The condition for preventing deletion has multiple checks with cross-model logic.
172-172: Fix filter visibility logic.The filter visibility check has a potential issue where it might not correctly evaluate the visibility condition.
172-173: Check for undefined filter configs.
Object.entries(filters).some(([_, filter]) => !filter.hide)could crash if any filter isundefined.frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Form.svelte (1)
69-69: LGTM! Good defensive programming practice.The addition of the optional chaining operator (
?.) makes the code more resilient by safely handling cases wheredatamight benullorundefined.frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+page.svelte (1)
59-60: LGTM! Consistent query parameter naming.The change from camelCase to snake_case in URL query parameters (
object_typeinstead ofobjectType) aligns with REST API best practices and improves consistency.Also applies to: 67-68, 75-76
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte (1)
150-151: LGTM! Consistent query parameter naming.The change from camelCase to snake_case in URL query parameters (
object_typeinstead ofobjectType) aligns with REST API best practices and improves consistency.Also applies to: 159-160, 168-169
backend/ebios_rm/views.py (3)
167-170: LGTM! Well-structured action method.The new
pertinenceaction method follows the established pattern of other choice-returning actions in the class.
222-222: Verify database index for likelihood filter.The addition of the
likelihoodfilter field could impact query performance if not properly indexed.
97-104:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify database indexes for new filter fields.
The addition of new filter fields (
assets,gravity,qualifications) could impact query performance if these fields aren't properly indexed.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the new filter fields have corresponding database indexes. # Search for index definitions in models echo "=== Checking FearedEvent model indexes ===" rg "class FearedEvent|db_index = True|index = True" -A 10 -B 5 backend/ebios_rm/models.py # Search for index definitions in migrations echo -e "\n=== Checking migrations for indexes ===" fd -e py -d 3 backend/ebios_rm/migrations -x rg -l "db\..*Index.*(assets|gravity|qualifications)"Length of output: 1277
Action Required: Confirm Database Indexes for New Filter Fields
The current checks indicate that while the models (e.g., the
FearedEventclass inbackend/ebios_rm/models.py) expose the new filter fieldassets, there’s no clear indication from the initial migration search that corresponding database indexes exist forassets,gravity, andqualifications. Note that the original migration search command failed due to a path pattern issue.
- Verify manually (or re-run with a corrected search) that the migration files in
backend/ebios_rm/migrationsinclude index definitions for these fields.- If the indexes are missing, consider adding them to improve query performance when filtering on these fields.
frontend/tests/functional/user-route.test.ts (1)
182-182: LGTM! URL parameter naming convention update.The change from
objectTypetoobject_typealigns with the standardization of query parameter naming conventions from camelCase to snake_case across the application.backend/library/views.py (3)
43-67: LGTM! Well-structured filter implementation.The
StoredLibraryFilterSetclass provides a clean implementation for filtering stored libraries by object type. The custom filtering method correctly handles multiple object types using Q objects for dynamic query construction.
132-133: LGTM! Correct HTTP method for state-modifying operation.The change from GET to POST for the
import_libraryendpoint is correct as it modifies server state by importing a library.
399-403: LGTM! Well-implemented update check endpoint.The
available_updatesaction provides a clean way to retrieve libraries that have updates available, using the appropriate serializer.backend/core/models.py (3)
737-760: Well-implemented library update detection methods!The new methods provide an efficient way to check for library updates:
has_updateefficiently checks for newer versions using a single queryupdatable_librariesuses proper database annotations and subqueries to find all updatable libraries
2545-2548: Add error handling to risk_scoring function.The function should handle potential errors when accessing the grid:
- Missing or invalid json_definition
- Index out of bounds for probability/impact
922-926: Good simplification of JSON parsing methods!The simplified implementations of
parse_jsonandparse_json_translatedfollow the KISS principle and improve code maintainability.backend/core/views.py (6)
130-144: Well-implemented generic filter set!The
GenericFilterSetprovides a robust foundation for dynamic filter creation with proper configuration forCharFieldfields. The implementation allows for flexible filtering with case-insensitive contains lookup and automatic handling of model field choices.
153-153: Consider restricting orderable fields.Setting
ordering_fields = "__all__"allows ordering by any model field, which could expose sensitive data or impact performance. Consider explicitly listing safe fields that can be used for ordering.
755-755: LGTM!Adding 'filtering_labels' to filterset_fields is a valid enhancement that enables filtering vulnerabilities by labels.
1909-1912: LGTM!The
stateaction method follows Django conventions for exposing model choices through the API.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
1911-1911:
RiskAcceptancemay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
1916-1918: LGTM!The
is_applied_control_ownerfilter is well-implemented and follows Django-filter conventions.
3925-3925: LGTM!The updated search fields improve search functionality by including both the requirement name and description.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (4)
5-5: Neat approach to handle navigation side-effects.The addition of
afterNavigateto reset or adjust state is a clean solution that centralizes page resets on navigation changes.
17-21: Confirm the user experience of resetting to page 1 on each navigation.Resetting the page number to 1 is fine if that's the desired behavior. If users might expect the previously selected page upon returning, you may want to store and retrieve this state instead.
25-25: Add ARIA labels to pagination buttons for better accessibility.This was previously suggested, but it remains unaddressed. By providing descriptive ARIA labels, screen reader users can more easily navigate these controls.
<button type="button" class:disabled={$pageNumber === 1} on:click={() => setPage('previous')}> + aria-label={m.previous()} {m.previous()} </button> ... <button type="button" on:click={() => setPage(page)} + aria-label={page ? `Page ${page}` : 'Ellipsis'} > {page ?? '...'} </button> ... <button type="button" class:disabled={$pageNumber === $pageCount} on:click={() => setPage('next')} + aria-label={m.next()} > {m.next()} </button>Also applies to: 29-30, 33-42, 47-47
2-2:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify the correctness of the remote import.
Ensure that the
@vincjo/datatables/remoteimport path is indeed correct and that it aligns with the expected location in your codebase or external package.You can run a quick search in the repository to confirm its availability and references:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash ast-grep --pattern $'import { DataHandler } from "@vincjo/datatables/remote"'Length of output: 78
Below is a revised review comment requesting a manual check, since the automated search didn’t return conclusive evidence regarding the import:
Action Required: Verify Remote Import Path
The automated search did not find any occurrences of
import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'even though this line appears in
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte. Please manually verify that the import path is correct—confirm that:
- The package/module
@vincjo/datatables/remoteis installed or defined as expected.- The
DataHandlertype is exported from the referenced location.- The path aligns with the project’s dependency configuration or external module documentation.
If it turns out the import is unused or incorrect, update accordingly. If it is correct, please mark this review comment as resolved.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte (1)
8-18: LGTM! Robust handling of undefined states.The changes improve the component's reliability by:
- Gracefully handling undefined states during initial load
- Using optional chaining for safe property access
- Maintaining proper type safety
- Following i18n best practices with paraglide messages
| const options = | ||
| typeof Object.values(optionsResponse)[0] === 'string' | ||
| ? Object.keys(optionsResponse) | ||
| .map((key) => ({ | ||
| label: optionsResponse[key], | ||
| value: key | ||
| })) | ||
| .sort((a, b) => a.label.localeCompare(b.label)) | ||
| : optionsResponse; | ||
|
|
||
| return new Response(JSON.stringify(options), { | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json' | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type checking robustness.
The current type check using Object.values()[0] is fragile as it assumes the response object has at least one value. This could lead to runtime errors with empty responses.
Apply this diff to improve the type checking:
- const options =
- typeof Object.values(optionsResponse)[0] === 'string'
+ const values = Object.values(optionsResponse);
+ const options =
+ values.length > 0 && typeof values[0] === 'string'
? Object.keys(optionsResponse)
.map((key) => ({
label: optionsResponse[key],
value: key
}))
.sort((a, b) => a.label.localeCompare(b.label))
- : optionsResponse;
+ : values.length === 0 ? [] : optionsResponse;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const options = | |
| typeof Object.values(optionsResponse)[0] === 'string' | |
| ? Object.keys(optionsResponse) | |
| .map((key) => ({ | |
| label: optionsResponse[key], | |
| value: key | |
| })) | |
| .sort((a, b) => a.label.localeCompare(b.label)) | |
| : optionsResponse; | |
| return new Response(JSON.stringify(options), { | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json' | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| }; | |
| const values = Object.values(optionsResponse); | |
| const options = | |
| values.length > 0 && typeof values[0] === 'string' | |
| ? Object.keys(optionsResponse) | |
| .map((key) => ({ | |
| label: optionsResponse[key], | |
| value: key | |
| })) | |
| .sort((a, b) => a.label.localeCompare(b.label)) | |
| : values.length === 0 ? [] : optionsResponse; | |
| return new Response(JSON.stringify(options), { | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json' | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| }; |
| extra: { | ||
| filters: { | ||
| risk: undefined, | ||
| probability: undefined, | ||
| impact: undefined, | ||
| likelihood: undefined, | ||
| gravity: undefined | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Confirm the purpose of undefined filters in extra.
These filters are explicitly set to undefined. Remove them if they’re no longer needed, or replace them with intended definitions if they’re placeholders.
The problem of loading libraries is due to search on translations not working. Tentative workaround by limiting the test on 12 libraries (anyway the full loading should be done separately)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts (1)
44-46: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImplement consistent error handling across all fetch requests.
Multiple fetch requests in the code have inconsistent or missing error handling:
- Related models fetch (lines 44-46)
- Object data fetch (lines 87-89)
- Select fields fetch (lines 103-115) has partial error handling but only logs errors
Consider implementing a consistent error handling pattern across all fetch requests:
const relEndpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${e.endpointUrl || e.urlModel}/?${e.field}=${event.params.id}`; -const res = await event.fetch(relEndpoint); -const revData = await res.json().then((res) => res.results); +try { + const res = await event.fetch(relEndpoint); + if (!res.ok) { + throw new Error(`Failed to fetch related data: ${res.statusText}`); + } + const revData = await res.json().then((res) => res.results); +} catch (error) { + console.error('Error fetching related data:', error); + throw error; +} // ... similar pattern for object data fetch ... -const objectEndpoint = `${endpoint}object/`; -const objectResponse = await event.fetch(objectEndpoint); -const objectData = await objectResponse.json(); +const objectEndpoint = `${endpoint}object/`; +try { + const objectResponse = await event.fetch(objectEndpoint); + if (!objectResponse.ok) { + throw new Error(`Failed to fetch object data: ${objectResponse.statusText}`); + } + const objectData = await objectResponse.json(); +} catch (error) { + console.error('Error fetching object data:', error); + throw error; +} // ... and for select fields fetch, propagate errors instead of just logging them ... -if (response.ok) { - selectOptions[selectField.field] = await response.json().then((data) => - Object.entries(data).map(([key, value]) => ({ - label: value, - value: selectField.valueType === 'number' ? parseInt(key) : key - })) - ); -} else { - console.error( - `Failed to fetch data for ${selectField.field}: ${response.statusText}` - ); -} +try { + if (!response.ok) { + throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data for ${selectField.field}: ${response.statusText}`); + } + selectOptions[selectField.field] = await response.json().then((data) => + Object.entries(data).map(([key, value]) => ({ + label: value, + value: selectField.valueType === 'number' ? parseInt(key) : key + })) + ); +} catch (error) { + console.error('Error fetching select field data:', error); + throw error; +}Also applies to: 87-89, 103-115
♻️ Duplicate comments (8)
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts (4)
7-11:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling and avoid direct state mutations.
The
loadTableDatafunction needs improvements:
- Error handling for fetch operations is missing
- Direct state mutation in async function could lead to race conditions
27-29: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove type safety and null checks.
The current implementation has type safety issues:
- Using
Record<string, any>could be more specific- Optional chaining suggests potential null values not reflected in types
32-41:⚠️ Potential issueValidate input parameters and sort direction.
The parameter handling needs validation:
- Offset and limit should be validated as positive numbers
- Sort direction should be validated
- Nullish coalescing is unnecessary for toString()
42-53:⚠️ Potential issueSanitize filter values.
Filter values are directly appended to URL parameters without sanitization, which could lead to XSS attacks.
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts (2)
6-9:⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation for route parameters.
The current implementation might be vulnerable to path traversal attacks.
Apply this diff to add parameter validation:
export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params }) => { + // Validate model and filter parameters + if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(params.model) || !/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(params.filter)) { + error(400, 'Invalid model or filter parameter'); + } + const model = getModelInfo(params.model); const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl ?? params.model}/${params.filter}/`;
15-24:⚠️ Potential issueImprove type checking robustness.
The current type check using
Object.values()[0]is fragile as it assumes the response object has at least one value.Apply this diff to improve the type checking:
const optionsResponse = await res.json(); + const values = Object.values(optionsResponse); const options = - typeof Object.values(optionsResponse)[0] === 'string' + values.length > 0 && typeof values[0] === 'string' ? Object.keys(optionsResponse) .map((key) => ({ label: optionsResponse[key], value: key })) .sort((a, b) => a.label.localeCompare(b.label)) - : optionsResponse; + : values.length === 0 ? [] : optionsResponse;backend/core/models.py (2)
737-746: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionOptimize the has_update property implementation.
The current implementation can be optimized based on past feedback.
@property def has_update(self) -> bool: - max_version = ( - StoredLibrary.objects.filter(urn=self.urn) - .values_list("version", flat=True) - .order_by("-version") - .first() - ) - return max_version > self.version if max_version is not None else False + max_version = StoredLibrary.objects.filter(urn=self.urn).values_list('version', flat=True).order_by('-version').first() + return max_version > self.version if max_version is not None else False
2545-2548: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd error handling to risk_scoring function.
The function needs error handling for potential issues.
def risk_scoring(probability, impact, risk_matrix: RiskMatrix) -> int: - fields = risk_matrix.json_definition - risk_index = fields["grid"][probability][impact] - return risk_index + fields = risk_matrix.json_definition + if not fields or "grid" not in fields: + raise ValueError("Invalid risk matrix definition") + grid = fields["grid"] + try: + risk_index = grid[probability][impact] + return risk_index + except IndexError: + raise ValueError(f"Invalid probability ({probability}) or impact ({impact}) indices")
🧹 Nitpick comments (17)
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (2)
7-7: Improve type safety by using a more specific type.Instead of using
any, consider using a more specific type for the timeout variable.-let timeout: any; +let timeout: ReturnType<typeof setTimeout>;
9-15: Consider making the debounce delay configurable.The debouncing implementation looks good! For better reusability, consider making the delay configurable via a prop.
<script lang="ts"> import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; import * as m from '$paraglide/messages'; export let handler: DataHandler; + export let debounceDelay = 400; let value = ''; let timeout: ReturnType<typeof setTimeout>; const search = () => { handler.search(value); clearTimeout(timeout); timeout = setTimeout(() => { handler.invalidate(); - }, 400); + }, debounceDelay); }; </script>frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts (3)
1-5: Add type definitions for API response data.Define interfaces to improve type safety and documentation:
interface ApiResponse { [key: string]: string | unknown; } interface Option { label: string; value: string; }
10-14: Add timeout handling for the fetch request.Consider adding a timeout to prevent hanging requests:
- const res = await fetch(endpoint); + const controller = new AbortController(); + const timeoutId = setTimeout(() => controller.abort(), 5000); + try { + const res = await fetch(endpoint, { signal: controller.signal }); + clearTimeout(timeoutId); + if (!res.ok) { + error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, await res.json()); + } + return res; + } catch (e) { + if (e instanceof Error && e.name === 'AbortError') { + error(504, 'Request timeout'); + } + throw e; + }
26-31: Add security headers to the response.Consider adding security headers to prevent XSS and other attacks:
return new Response(JSON.stringify(options), { headers: { - 'Content-Type': 'application/json' + 'Content-Type': 'application/json', + 'X-Content-Type-Options': 'nosniff', + 'X-Frame-Options': 'DENY', + 'Content-Security-Policy': "default-src 'none'" } });frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts (1)
18-23: Add caching and rate limiting headers.Since this endpoint is part of a paginated API, consider adding appropriate caching and rate limiting headers to improve performance and prevent abuse.
return new Response(JSON.stringify(data), { status: res.status, headers: { - 'Content-Type': 'application/json' + 'Content-Type': 'application/json', + 'Cache-Control': 'public, max-age=60', // Cache for 1 minute + 'X-RateLimit-Limit': '100', + 'X-RateLimit-Remaining': '99', // Implement actual rate limiting logic + 'X-RateLimit-Reset': (Date.now() + 3600000).toString() // Reset after 1 hour } });backend/library/views.py (2)
4-5: Clean up unused imports.Remove the following unused imports:
rest_framework.viewsetsandrest_framework.statusfrom line 5.helpers.update_translations_in_objectfrom line 25-from django.db.models import F, Q, IntegerField, OuterRef, Subquery -from rest_framework import viewsets, status +from django.db.models import F, Q, IntegerField, OuterRef, Subquery -from .helpers import update_translations, update_translations_in_object +from .helpers import update_translationsAlso applies to: 25-25
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
5-5:
rest_framework.viewsetsimported but unusedRemove unused import
(F401)
5-5:
rest_framework.statusimported but unusedRemove unused import
(F401)
222-237: LGTM! Well-structured metadata endpoints.The new action methods for provider, locale, and object_type provide useful metadata endpoints. Consider adding docstrings to describe their purpose and response format.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
230-230: Ambiguous variable name:
l(E741)
232-232: Ambiguous variable name:
l(E741)
frontend/src/params/filters.ts (1)
4-16: Add memoization, type safety, and documentation.While the implementation is functional, consider these improvements:
- Memoize the filter keys set to avoid rebuilding it on every call
- Add explicit type for the param and JSDoc documentation
Here's the suggested implementation:
+/** + * Matches a URL parameter against available filter keys. + * Filter keys are derived from listViewFields and normalized to lowercase with underscores. + * @param {string} param - The URL parameter to match + * @returns {boolean} True if the parameter matches a known filter key + */ +const filterKeysSet = new Set( + Object.values(listViewFields) + .flatMap((field) => ('filters' in field && field.filters ? Object.keys(field.filters) : [])) +); + -export const match = ((param) => { +export const match = ((param: string) => { - const filterKeys = new Set<string>(); - - Object.values(listViewFields).forEach((field) => { - if ('filters' in field && field.filters) { - Object.keys(field.filters).forEach((filterKey) => filterKeys.add(filterKey)); - } - }); - - // Example output: ["folder", "lc_status", "filtering_labels"] - - return filterKeys.has(param.toLowerCase().replace(/-/g, '_')); + return filterKeysSet.has(param.toLowerCase().replace(/-/g, '_')); }) satisfies ParamMatcher;backend/ebios_rm/views.py (3)
136-143: Consider optimizing queries for relationship fields.The
feared_eventsfield likely represents a many-to-many relationship. Consider implementing a custom filter method similar tois_usedto optimize the query if complex filtering is needed.def filter_feared_events(self, queryset, name, value): # Add custom filtering logic here return queryset.prefetch_related('feared_events').filter(feared_events=value)
167-170: Add caching to pertinence choices endpoint.Consider adding cache decoration to the
pertinenceaction method, similar to other choice-returning endpoints in the codebase.+ @method_decorator(cache_page(60 * LONG_CACHE_TTL)) @action(detail=False, name="Get pertinence choices") def pertinence(self, request): return Response(dict(RoTo.Pertinence.choices))
204-210: Consider query optimization for stakeholders filtering.The addition of the
stakeholdersfilter field might benefit from:
- Database indexing for performance
- Custom filter method for complex queries
- Select/prefetch related optimization if needed
def filter_stakeholders(self, queryset, name, value): return queryset.prefetch_related('stakeholders').filter(stakeholders=value)backend/core/helpers.py (1)
22-22: Consider explicit imports instead of star imports.Replace
from .models import *with explicit imports to improve code maintainability and avoid potential naming conflicts. This will also resolve the static analysis warnings aboutRiskScenario.-from .models import * +from .models import ( + RiskScenario, + AppliedControl, + RiskAssessment, + ComplianceAssessment, + RequirementAssessment, + RiskAcceptance, + Evidence, + Threat, + Policy, + Perimeter, + RequirementNode, + ReferenceControl +)🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
22-22:
from .models import *used; unable to detect undefined names(F403)
backend/core/views.py (1)
11-11: Remove unused import.The
filterset_factoryimport is not used in the code.-from django_filters.filterset import filterset_factory🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
11-11:
django_filters.filterset.filterset_factoryimported but unusedRemove unused import:
django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory(F401)
frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (3)
7-7: Use a more descriptive name or JSDoc for thepropsproperty.
While introducing a genericpropsobject is flexible, adding explicit typing or documentation (e.g., describing the purpose ofmultipleoroptionsEndpoint) can aid in maintenance and clarity.
23-26: Consider grouping shared options into a well-known constants file.
YES_NO_OPTIONSis useful for multiple boolean toggles. Extracting it into a shared constants or config file may improve discoverability.
272-293: Address the TODO tags around test coverage.
You have “// TODO: TEST THIS” comments at lines 272 and 284 (and below). It’s best to write or at least stub these tests now to avoid technical debt.Do you want me to draft a basic test suite for these filter definitions?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (30)
backend/core/helpers.py(1 hunks)backend/core/migrations/0055_alter_storedlibrary_content.py(1 hunks)backend/core/models.py(4 hunks)backend/core/views.py(11 hunks)backend/ebios_rm/views.py(5 hunks)backend/library/views.py(6 hunks)frontend/messages/en.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/DetailView/DetailView.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte(3 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Form.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte(10 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts(15 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/types.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/params/filters.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte(3 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+page.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/tests/functional/detailed/libraries.test.ts(1 hunks)frontend/tests/functional/user-route.test.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- backend/core/migrations/0055_alter_storedlibrary_content.py
- frontend/messages/en.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- frontend/src/lib/components/DetailView/DetailView.svelte
- frontend/src/lib/utils/types.ts
- frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte
- frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/library/views.py
5-5: rest_framework.viewsets imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
5-5: rest_framework.status imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
25-25: .helpers.update_translations_in_object imported but unused
Remove unused import: .helpers.update_translations_in_object
(F401)
230-230: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
232-232: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
backend/core/helpers.py
399-399: RiskScenario may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
405-405: RiskScenario may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
backend/core/views.py
11-11: django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory imported but unused
Remove unused import: django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory
(F401)
295-295: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
299-299: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
308-308: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
654-654: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
655-655: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
659-659: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
674-674: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
675-675: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
678-678: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
684-684: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
685-685: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
689-689: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
1202-1202: UserReadSerializer may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
1911-1911: RiskAcceptance may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: build (3.12)
🔇 Additional comments (49)
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte (2)
2-2: Update to the latest package version.The import path
@vincjo/datatables/remoteis outdated. The latest version (v2.5.0) replaces it with@vincjo/datatables/serverandTableHandler.Apply this diff to update to the latest version:
-import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; +import type { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/server';Note: This change will require updating the handler type and related API usage throughout the component.
8-18: LGTM! Robust error handling.The template changes improve the component's reliability by:
- Explicitly handling undefined state
- Using optional chaining for safe property access
- Following best practices for conditional rendering
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte (3)
2-2: Update the import path for DataHandler.The current import path needs to be updated based on your Svelte version:
- For Svelte 4: Use
@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote- For Svelte 5: Use
@vincjo/datatables/serverand switch toTableHandler
13-15: Great accessibility improvements!The addition of dynamic placeholder text, aria-label, and role attributes enhances the component's accessibility and user experience.
17-22: Fix the debouncing implementation to prevent memory leaks.The current implementation may cause memory leaks as timeouts aren't properly cleared. Additionally, the cleanup function is returned but not used by Svelte's event handler.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte (4)
2-2: Update the import path for DataHandler.The import path needs to be updated based on your version:
- For v1 (legacy):
import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote';- For v2:
import { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/server';
9-12: LGTM! Good pagination UX.The function correctly resets to page 1 when rows per page changes and triggers a refresh, following best practices for pagination UX.
14-16: LGTM! Good edge case handling.The reactive statement properly handles the edge case when the current page's start index exceeds the total count, with appropriate null-safe access.
21-25: LGTM! Clean and functional select implementation.The select element is well-implemented with proper value binding, change handling, and styling.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (2)
2-2: LGTM! Consistent with remote data handling.The import change aligns with the broader refactoring to support remote data handling across components.
24-24: LGTM! Clean event handling.The event handler update follows Svelte best practices and correctly implements the debounced search.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte (3)
2-2: LGTM! Verify the package version.The change to remote data handling aligns well with the PR's pagination objectives.
9-13: LGTM! Improved sorting logic.The sorting logic has been centralized into an
updatefunction, making it more maintainable and reusable.
21-26: LGTM! Enhanced accessibility with ARIA attributes.The addition of
role="columnheader"and dynamicaria-sortattributes improves accessibility by providing clear sorting information to screen readers.frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts (2)
14-14: LGTM! Nice use of the nullish coalescing operator.The change improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality.
16-17: Add error handling for the main fetch request.The fetch request lacks error handling. Consider adding try-catch blocks and proper error responses.
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts (3)
1-4: LGTM!The imports are well-organized and correctly typed, providing all necessary dependencies for the implementation.
6-15: Enhance error handling and add request validation.The current implementation directly forwards URL parameters and error responses, which could potentially expose sensitive information.
Consider these improvements:
- Validate and sanitize URL parameters before forwarding
- Implement specific error handling instead of directly exposing backend errors
- Add request timeout
export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params, url }) => { + const controller = new AbortController(); + const timeout = setTimeout(() => controller.abort(), 5000); + const model = getModelInfo('ebios-rm'); + const validParams = ['limit', 'offset', 'search']; // Add your valid params + const sanitizedParams = new URLSearchParams(); + + for (const [key, value] of url.searchParams) { + if (validParams.includes(key)) { + sanitizedParams.append(key, value); + } + } + const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl}${ - url.searchParams ? '?' + url.searchParams.toString() : '' + sanitizedParams.toString() ? '?' + sanitizedParams.toString() : '' }`; - const res = await fetch(endpoint); + try { + const res = await fetch(endpoint, { + signal: controller.signal + }); + clearTimeout(timeout); + + if (!res.ok) { + throw error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, 'Failed to fetch data'); + }
16-23: Add type safety and pagination handling.The response data handling lacks type safety and proper pagination support.
Consider these improvements:
- Define an interface for the expected response data structure
- Add pagination metadata handling
- Implement proper error types
+interface EbiosRMResponse { + count: number; + next: string | null; + previous: string | null; + results: Array<unknown>; // Replace with your specific type +} export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params, url }) => { const model = getModelInfo('ebios-rm'); const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl}${ url.searchParams ? '?' + url.searchParams.toString() : '' }`; const res = await fetch(endpoint); if (!res.ok) { - error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, await res.json()); + const errorData = await res.json(); + throw error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, { + message: 'Failed to fetch data', + details: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' ? errorData : undefined + }); } - const data = await res.json(); + const data = await res.json() as EbiosRMResponse; return new Response(JSON.stringify(data), { status: res.status, headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } }); };frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.ts (2)
6-23: LGTM! Well-structured error handling and response construction.The implementation follows best practices:
- Proper error handling with status codes
- Type-safe error responses using NumericRange
- Clean URL parameter handling
- Correct content-type headers
15-15:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify pagination handling in consuming components.
The change to return the complete JSON response instead of extracting just the
resultsproperty might affect components that expect only the results array. This could impact pagination, filtering, and data rendering in the frontend.Run the following script to find components that might be affected by this change:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find components that might be affected by the response structure change # Search for components that handle the response data rg -l "results\." "frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)" # Search for pagination-related code that might expect results rg -l "totalPages|pageSize|currentPage" "frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)"Length of output: 145
Action Required: Manually Verify Downstream Consumption of API Response
The changes return the entire JSON response instead of just the
resultsproperty. Our search in the(app)/(third-party)folder did not reveal direct usage of theresultsproperty or pagination-specific code (e.g., references tototalPages,pageSize, orcurrentPage). However, please manually verify that no consuming components outside this search scope rely on the previous response structure—especially regarding pagination, filtering, or data rendering.backend/library/views.py (4)
43-67: LGTM! Well-structured filter implementation.The
StoredLibraryFilterSetclass provides a clean and efficient implementation for filteringStoredLibraryobjects, with good use of Q objects for complex queries.
132-133: LGTM! Improved HTTP method semantics.Good change from GET to POST for the import_library endpoint, as it better reflects the state-changing nature of the operation.
239-291: LGTM! Sophisticated filtering implementation.The
LoadedLibraryFilterSetprovides well-implemented filters:
- Efficient subquery usage for has_update filtering
- Complex but performant object_type filtering
293-404: LGTM! Well-structured view enhancements.Good additions to the
LoadedLibraryViewSet:
- Proper serializer class selection based on action
- Useful available_updates endpoint for checking library updates
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
316-316: Do not use bare
except(E722)
333-333: Do not use bare
except(E722)
350-350: Do not use bare
except(E722)
361-361: Do not use bare
except(E722)
frontend/src/params/filters.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and well-structured imports.The imports are correctly defined, and the type import uses the
typekeyword for better tree-shaking.
4-16:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify route configurations and filter key consistency.
Since this matcher is used for URL parameters, ensure:
- Route configurations are updated to use this matcher
- Filter keys in
listViewFieldsconsistently use lowercase with underscores
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check route configurations and filter key formats echo "Checking route configurations..." rg -A 5 "param.match.*filters" src/routes echo "Checking filter key formats in listViewFields..." ast-grep --pattern 'filters: { $$$ }'Length of output: 318
Action Required: Verify Route Configurations and Filter Key Consistency
- The verification script couldn’t locate a
src/routesdirectory. Please confirm where your route configurations actually reside and ensure these routes correctly utilize the new matcher.- Although the filter key format check via
ast-grepreturned no alerts, double-check that all filter keys withinlistViewFieldsare formatted in lowercase with underscores to maintain consistency.backend/ebios_rm/views.py (3)
175-175: LGTM!The addition of the
categoryfilter field aligns well with the existing category choices endpoint.
222-222: Ensure database index for likelihood field.As previously noted in past reviews, the addition of the
likelihoodfilter field requires proper database indexing to maintain optimal query performance.
97-104:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify database indexes for new filter fields.
The addition of relationship-based filter fields (
assets,gravity,qualifications) could impact query performance. Ensure these fields are properly indexed in the database.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the new filter fields have corresponding database indexes # Search for index definitions in models rg 'class FearedEvent:|db_index = True|index = True' -A 10 -B 5 'class FearedEvent' # Search for index definitions in migrations fd -e py -d 3 . migrations/ -x rg -l 'db\..*Index.*(assets|gravity|qualifications)'Length of output: 328
Database Index Verification Required
The new filter fields (
assets,gravity,qualifications) in the view may impact query performance if they are not properly indexed. The automated search did not return any index definitions—likely due to the search paths missing the actual model or migration locations. Please manually verify the following:
- Check the Django model(s) (e.g., the model related to
FearedEvent) to confirm that these fields havedb_index=True(or equivalent indexing configurations).- Inspect the migration files (which may reside in non-standard directories such as
backend/ebios_rm/migrations) for any operations that create indexes on these fields.Once you’ve confirmed that the indexes are correctly implemented, you can safely proceed.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (4)
2-2: LGTM! Import path updated for remote data handling.The import path has been updated to use the remote data handler from
@vincjo/datatables/remote, which aligns with the pagination changes for API calls.
12-15: LGTM! Well-structured page management function.The
setPagefunction effectively consolidates the page change logic by handling both the page update and invalidation in a single function.
17-21: LGTM! Reset pagination on navigation.The
afterNavigatehook ensures a consistent user experience by resetting the page to 1 when the URL changes.
24-50: Add ARIA labels to pagination buttons for accessibility.The pagination buttons need proper accessibility attributes to improve usability for screen readers.
Apply this diff to add ARIA labels:
-<button type="button" class:disabled={$pageNumber === 1} on:click={() => setPage('previous')}> +<button + type="button" + class:disabled={$pageNumber === 1} + on:click={() => setPage('previous')} + aria-label={m.previous()} +> {m.previous()} </button> {#if $pages === undefined} - <button type="button" on:click={() => setPage($pageNumber)}> + <button + type="button" + on:click={() => setPage($pageNumber)} + aria-label={`Page ${$pageNumber}`} + > {$pageNumber} </button>frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Form.svelte (1)
69-69: LGTM! Added null safety with optional chaining.The addition of optional chaining (
?.) prevents potential runtime errors whendatais undefined.frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+page.svelte (1)
59-60: LGTM! Standardized URL query parameter naming.The query parameter naming has been consistently updated from camelCase to snake_case (
objectType→object_type), improving API consistency.Also applies to: 67-68, 75-76
frontend/tests/functional/detailed/libraries.test.ts (1)
17-17: LGTM! Optimized test performance.The test has been optimized by limiting the number of libraries to load to a maximum of 12, which helps reduce test execution time while maintaining adequate coverage.
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte (1)
150-150: LGTM! Consistent URL parameter naming.The changes correctly update the query parameter from
objectTypetoobject_type, maintaining consistency with snake_case naming convention across the codebase.Also applies to: 159-159, 168-168
frontend/tests/functional/user-route.test.ts (1)
182-182: LGTM! Test updated to match new URL parameter format.The test case has been correctly updated to use
object_typeinstead ofobjectTypein the URL, maintaining consistency with the implementation changes.backend/core/helpers.py (1)
398-410: LGTM! Simplified list initialization.The code has been improved by directly assigning the queryset result to
risk_matricesinstead of using an intermediate empty list.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
399-399:
RiskScenariomay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
405-405:
RiskScenariomay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
backend/core/views.py (2)
130-144: LGTM! Well-structured generic filter implementation.The
GenericFilterSetclass provides a robust foundation for dynamic filtering across models:
- Automatically uses all model fields
- Properly handles CharField fields with MultipleChoiceFilter
- Supports model field choices when available
153-155: Consider restricting orderable fields.Setting
ordering_fields = "__all__"allows ordering by any model field, which could expose sensitive data or impact performance. Consider explicitly listing safe fields that can be used for ordering.frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (6)
1-3: Add missing context or justification for new imports.
You have introducedAutocompleteSelectandOptionfromsvelte-multiselect. Ensure these new dependencies are truly necessary for the pagination or filtering changes described in the PR objectives. Otherwise, clarify their usage and confirm no extraneous imports remain.
18-18: Confirm the necessity of allowingListViewFilterConfig | undefined.
This optional type can introduce null checks throughout. If every filter is truly optional, ensure the consumer code carefully handles theundefinedcase to avoid runtime errors or surprising behavior.
29-229: Refactor repeatedAutocompleteSelectfilter definitions.
Many filter objects have nearly identical shapes (e.g.,component: AutocompleteSelect, repeatedoptionsEndpoint/multiplestructures). This parallels a previous refactor request, so please see that feedback if still applicable.
818-825: Remove or justifyundefinedfilters inextra.
Past reviews indicated the same concern regarding explicitly setting filters toundefined. If these placeholders are still needed, add a comment explaining their future purpose.
827-827: Good use ofas constfor strict typing.
DeclaringlistViewFieldsasconstand assertingListViewFieldsConfighelps ensure type safety and preemptively catch mismatches. No additional issues found.
829-834: Helpful introduction ofFilterKeystype.
ExportingFilterKeysclarifies which filter keys each model supports. Nicely done for developer usability.frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts (1)
780-787: Align old references to “libraries” with new “stored-libraries” or “loaded-libraries” keys.
Renaming entries in theFIELD_COMPONENT_MAPis consistent, but confirm that all internal and UI references (e.g., nav items, form actions) are updated. This matches a prior comment about lingering “libraries” references.Run a repository-wide search to ensure no stale references remain:
#!/bin/bash rg -A 5 "libraries"
| @action(detail=False, name="Get risk level choices") | ||
| def risk(self, request): | ||
| viewable_matrices: list[RiskMatrix] = RoleAssignment.get_accessible_object_ids( | ||
| Folder.get_root_folder(), request.user, RiskMatrix | ||
| )[0] | ||
| undefined = {-1: "--"} | ||
| options = [] | ||
| for matrix in RiskMatrix.objects.filter(id__in=viewable_matrices): | ||
| _choices = { | ||
| i: name | ||
| for i, name in enumerate( | ||
| x["name"] for x in matrix.json_definition["risk"] | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| choices = undefined | _choices | ||
| options = options | choices.items() | ||
| return Response( | ||
| [{k: v for k, v in zip(("value", "label"), o)} for o in options] | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| @action(detail=False, name="Get impact choices") | ||
| def impact(self, request): | ||
| viewable_matrices: list[RiskMatrix] = RoleAssignment.get_accessible_object_ids( | ||
| Folder.get_root_folder(), request.user, RiskMatrix | ||
| )[0] | ||
| impacts = [ | ||
| m.impact for m in RiskMatrix.objects.filter(id__in=viewable_matrices) | ||
| ] | ||
| return Response(chain.from_iterable(impacts)) | ||
|
|
||
| @action(detail=False, name="Get probability choices") | ||
| def probability(self, request): | ||
| viewable_matrices: list[RiskMatrix] = RoleAssignment.get_accessible_object_ids( | ||
| Folder.get_root_folder(), request.user, RiskMatrix | ||
| )[0] | ||
| undefined = {-1: "--"} | ||
| options = [] | ||
| for matrix in RiskMatrix.objects.filter(id__in=viewable_matrices): | ||
| _choices = { | ||
| i: name | ||
| for i, name in enumerate( | ||
| x["name"] for x in matrix.json_definition["probability"] | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| choices = undefined | _choices | ||
| options = options | choices.items() | ||
| return Response( | ||
| [{k: v for k, v in zip(("value", "label"), o)} for o in options] | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify RiskMatrix model import.
The new risk level, impact, and probability choice actions are well-implemented, but ensure the RiskMatrix model is properly imported. Currently, it might be coming from star imports which could lead to maintainability issues.
Run this script to check the imports:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if RiskMatrix is properly imported
rg -A 1 "^from.*import.*RiskMatrix" || rg "^from.*import \*"Length of output: 1056
Attention: Ensure Explicit Import of RiskMatrix in backend/core/views.py
The new risk level, impact, and probability actions are implemented well; however, it appears that in backend/core/views.py the RiskMatrix model might be coming in via a star-import. Other files (such as the test modules) explicitly import RiskMatrix (e.g., from core.models import RiskMatrix), so for maintainability and to prevent potential static analysis warnings, please add an explicit import for RiskMatrix in this file.
- Action Required:
- Confirm and update backend/core/views.py to include an explicit import statement for
RiskMatrix, e.g.,from core.models import RiskMatrix, instead of relying on a star-import.
- Confirm and update backend/core/views.py to include an explicit import statement for
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
654-654: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
655-655: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
659-659: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
674-674: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
675-675: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
678-678: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
684-684: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
685-685: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
689-689: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
| @action(detail=False, name="Get all applied controls owners") | ||
| def owner(self, request): | ||
| return Response( | ||
| UserReadSerializer( | ||
| User.objects.filter(applied_controls__isnull=False), many=True | ||
| ).data | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify UserReadSerializer import.
The owner action is well-implemented, but ensure the UserReadSerializer is properly imported. Currently, it might be coming from star imports which could lead to maintainability issues.
Run this script to check the imports:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if UserReadSerializer is properly imported
rg -A 1 "^from.*import.*UserReadSerializer" || rg "^from.*import \*"Length of output: 1835
Action Required: Replace wildcard import with an explicit UserReadSerializer import.
The current implementation in backend/core/views.py uses a wildcard import (from .serializers import *), which makes it unclear where UserReadSerializer is coming from. To improve code clarity and maintainability, please update the import to explicitly reference UserReadSerializer (e.g., from core.serializers import UserReadSerializer).
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
1202-1202: UserReadSerializer may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
| choices=Perimeter.PRJ_LC_STATUS, lookup_expr="icontains" | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| class Meta: | ||
| model = Perimeter | ||
| fields = ["folder", "lc_status"] | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify Perimeter model import.
The PerimeterFilter implementation looks good, but ensure the Perimeter model is properly imported. Currently, it might be coming from star imports which could lead to maintainability issues.
Run this script to check the imports:
Also applies to: 309-310
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if Perimeter is properly imported
rg -A 1 "^from.*import.*Perimeter" || rg "^from.*import \*"Length of output: 949
Action Required: Ensure Explicit Import of Perimeter in Views
The PerimeterFilter implementation looks good, but please verify that you're importing the Perimeter model explicitly (e.g., from core.models import Perimeter) instead of relying on star imports. Our review of the test files and filters shows explicit imports, so it’s important to apply the same clarity in backend/core/views.py—specifically for the code at lines 295–301 and 309–310.
- Confirm an explicit import exists in this file rather than relying on implicit or wildcard imports.
- Update the import to:
if it’s missing or coming via a star import.
from core.models import Perimeter
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
295-295: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
299-299: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
…2-handle-backend-pagination
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts (1)
16-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd type safety for response transformation.
The current implementation assumes the response structure without validation. A previous review already suggested adding type safety, but we should also validate the transformed data structure.
+interface Option { + label: string; + value: string; +} + +function isValidOptions(data: unknown): data is Option[] { + return Array.isArray(data) && data.every(item => + typeof item === 'object' && item !== null && + 'label' in item && typeof item.label === 'string' && + 'value' in item && typeof item.value === 'string' + ); +} + const options = typeof Object.values(optionsResponse)[0] === 'string' ? Object.keys(optionsResponse) @@ -20,5 +32,12 @@ value: key })) .sort((a, b) => a.label.localeCompare(b.label)) - : optionsResponse; + : optionsResponse as unknown; + + // Validate transformed data + if (!isValidOptions(options)) { + error(500, 'Invalid options format in response'); + } + + return options;frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts (2)
32-55:⚠️ Potential issueAdd parameter validation and sanitization.
The
getParamsfunction needs parameter validation and value sanitization.Apply this diff to add validation and sanitization:
+const isPositiveNumber = (value: number) => Number.isInteger(value) && value >= 0; +const isValidSortDirection = (direction: string): boolean => ['asc', 'desc'].includes(direction); +const sanitizeValue = (value: unknown): string => { + const sanitized = encodeURIComponent(String(value)); + return sanitized.replace(/[!'()*]/g, c => '%' + c.charCodeAt(0).toString(16)); +}; const getParams = ({ offset, rowsPerPage, search, sort, filters }: State) => { const params = new URLSearchParams(); - params.set('offset', offset.toString() ?? '0'); - params.set('limit', rowsPerPage.toString() ?? '10'); + if (!isPositiveNumber(offset)) throw new Error('Invalid offset value'); + if (!isPositiveNumber(rowsPerPage)) throw new Error('Invalid rowsPerPage value'); + params.set('offset', offset.toString()); + params.set('limit', rowsPerPage.toString()); if (search) { - params.set('search', search); + params.set('search', sanitizeValue(search)); } if (sort) { + if (!isValidSortDirection(sort.direction)) { + throw new Error('Invalid sort direction. Must be "asc" or "desc".'); + } params.set('ordering', `${sort.direction === 'desc' ? '-' : ''}${sort.orderBy}`); } if (filters) { for (const filter of filters) { const filterKey = filter.filterBy.toString(); if (Array.isArray(filter.value)) { for (const val of filter.value) { - params.append(filterKey, val.toString()); + params.append(filterKey, sanitizeValue(val)); } } else if (filter.value) { - params.append(filterKey, filter.value.toString()); + params.append(filterKey, sanitizeValue(filter.value)); } } } return params; };
7-30:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling and improve type safety.
The
loadTableDatafunction needs error handling and more specific types.Apply this diff to add error handling and improve type safety:
+interface TableItem { + [key: string]: string | number | boolean; + meta?: Record<string, unknown>; +} export const loadTableData = async (state: State, URLModel: urlModel, endpoint: string) => { - const response = await fetch(`${endpoint}?${getParams(state)}`).then((res) => res.json()); - state.setTotalRows(response.count); + try { + const res = await fetch(`${endpoint}?${getParams(state)}`); + if (!res.ok) { + throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${res.status}`); + } + const response = await res.json(); + const results = response?.results || []; + state.setTotalRows(response.count); - const bodyData = tableSourceMapper(response.results, listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body); + const bodyData = tableSourceMapper(results, listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body); // ... rest of the function ... - return table.body.map((item: Record<string, any>, index: number) => { + return table.body.map((item: TableItem, index: number) => { return { ...item, meta: table?.meta?.results ? { ...table.meta.results[index] } : undefined }; }); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error loading table data:', error); + throw error; + } };
🧹 Nitpick comments (18)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts (2)
10-13: Enhance error handling with timeout and detailed error messages.The current error handling could be more robust by adding request timeout and providing more detailed error information.
+ const controller = new AbortController(); + const timeout = setTimeout(() => controller.abort(), 5000); + - const res = await fetch(endpoint); + try { + const res = await fetch(endpoint, { + signal: controller.signal + }); + if (!res.ok) { + const errorData = await res.json(); + error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, { + message: errorData.message || 'An error occurred', + endpoint, + status: res.status + }); + } + } catch (e) { + if (e instanceof Error) { + error(500, { + message: e.message, + endpoint + }); + } + throw e; + } finally { + clearTimeout(timeout); + } - if (!res.ok) { - error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, await res.json()); - }
26-30: Optimize response with compression for large datasets.Consider adding compression for the response to improve performance, especially for large datasets.
return new Response(JSON.stringify(options), { headers: { - 'Content-Type': 'application/json' + 'Content-Type': 'application/json', + 'Content-Encoding': 'gzip', + 'Vary': 'Accept-Encoding' } });frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.ts (1)
15-15: LGTM! Consider documenting the response structure.The simplified data handling correctly passes through the complete API response, which is necessary for pagination. Consider adding a comment documenting the expected response structure for better maintainability.
+// Response structure: { results: T[], count: number, next: string|null, previous: string|null } const data = await res.json();frontend/tests/functional/detailed/libraries.test.ts (2)
6-6: Consider reducing the test timeout.The 10-minute timeout (600000ms) seems excessive for loading 12 libraries. Consider profiling the actual time needed and reducing this value.
17-17: Document the rationale for the 12-library limit.The arbitrary limit of 12 libraries needs justification. Consider:
- Adding a comment explaining why 12 was chosen
- Making this limit configurable via a constant
+// Limit library loading to 12 to prevent test timeouts while ensuring adequate coverage +const MAX_LIBRARIES_TO_TEST = 12; -for (let i = 1; i < Math.min(12, libraries.length); i++) { +for (let i = 1; i < Math.min(MAX_LIBRARIES_TO_TEST, libraries.length); i++) {frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (1)
9-15: Consider extracting debounce timeout to a constant.The debounce implementation is good, but the timeout duration should be defined as a constant for better maintainability.
+const DEBOUNCE_TIMEOUT = 400; // milliseconds + const search = () => { handler.search(value); clearTimeout(timeout); timeout = setTimeout(() => { handler.invalidate(); - }, 400); + }, DEBOUNCE_TIMEOUT); };frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (1)
25-48: Add ARIA labels to pagination buttons.The pagination buttons need proper accessibility attributes.
Apply this diff to add ARIA labels:
-<button type="button" class:disabled={$pageNumber === 1} on:click={() => setPage('previous')}> +<button + type="button" + class:disabled={$pageNumber === 1} + on:click={() => setPage('previous')} + aria-label={m.previous()} +> {m.previous()} </button> {#if $pages === undefined} - <button type="button" on:click={() => setPage($pageNumber)}> + <button + type="button" + on:click={() => setPage($pageNumber)} + aria-label={`Page ${$pageNumber}`} + > {$pageNumber} </button> {:else} {#each $pages as page} <button type="button" class:active={$pageNumber === page} class:ellipse={page === null} on:click={() => setPage(page)} + aria-label={page ? `Page ${page}` : 'More pages'} > {page ?? '...'} </button> {/each} {/if}frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (6)
7-7: Props interface is concise but consider future extensibility.
Defining all filter props under a singlepropsobject is a clear improvement. However, if additional fields become necessary (e.g., placeholder, defaultValue), ensure the interface remains flexible.
59-67: Priority filter approach.
The frequent usage ofoptionsLabelFieldandoptionsValueFieldsuggests a recurring pattern. Consider a single typed configuration object or a utility to reduce code duplication.
69-76: Endpoint usage for PERIMETER_FILTER.
Combined with the domain filter, it might be beneficial to keep consistent naming: e.g.,'perimeters'vs.'folders?content_type=...'. Just ensure consistent naming for clarity.
253-259: Entity filter.
Ensure'entities'is not large enough to cause performance issues in theAutocompleteSelect.
272-280:CURRENT_CRITICALITY_FILTER: Remember the TODO.
You indicated// TODO: TEST THIS. Plan to add unit or integration tests to confirm the numeric array[1,2,3,4]is handled correctly.
327-334: Asset type filter.
This remains consistent with the pattern. Might combine with asset filter logic if needed to unify usage.backend/library/views.py (2)
222-226:provideraction returning a dictionary mapping.
Consider returning a list or a more structured payload if the front-end requires additional metadata in the future. This is purely a style choice.
234-237:object_typeaction
Simply returningLibraryImporter.OBJECT_FIELDSis fine. If large, consider pagination or chunking.backend/core/views.py (3)
11-11: Remove the unused import.The static analysis indicates that
filterset_factoryis never used in this file, which may cause confusion.Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
- from django_filters.filterset import filterset_factory🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
11-11:
django_filters.filterset.filterset_factoryimported but unusedRemove unused import:
django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory(F401)
130-143: Restrict filter fields for security and performance.Using
fields = "__all__"in a filter set may inadvertently expose fields you didn't intend to be user-filterable, or cause performance overhead on large tables. Consider limiting filters to only the fields you truly need.
160-169: Remove or clarify the commented-out code.These lines are commented out but still refer to
filterset_factory. If no longer needed, consider removing them to reduce clutter. Otherwise, add a clear explanation or TODO for why they're commented.- # @property - # def filterset_class(self): - # # If you have defined filterset_fields, build the FilterSet on the fly. - # if self.filterset_fields: - # return filterset_factory( - # model=self.model, - # filterset=GenericFilterSet, - # fields=self.filterset_fields, - # ) - # return None
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (30)
backend/core/migrations/0055_alter_storedlibrary_content.py(1 hunks)backend/core/migrations/0056_data_store_matrix_json_as_dict_not_str.py(1 hunks)backend/core/models.py(2 hunks)backend/core/views.py(11 hunks)backend/ebios_rm/views.py(5 hunks)backend/library/views.py(6 hunks)frontend/messages/en.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/DetailView/DetailView.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte(3 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Form.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte(10 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts(15 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/types.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/params/filters.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+page.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/tests/functional/detailed/libraries.test.ts(1 hunks)frontend/tests/functional/user-route.test.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- backend/core/migrations/0055_alter_storedlibrary_content.py
- frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte
- frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+page.svelte
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- frontend/src/lib/utils/types.ts
- frontend/src/lib/components/DetailView/DetailView.svelte
- frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/library/views.py
5-5: rest_framework.viewsets imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
5-5: rest_framework.status imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
25-25: .helpers.update_translations_in_object imported but unused
Remove unused import: .helpers.update_translations_in_object
(F401)
230-230: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
232-232: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
backend/core/views.py
11-11: django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory imported but unused
Remove unused import: django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory
(F401)
295-295: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
299-299: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
308-308: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
654-654: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
655-655: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
659-659: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
674-674: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
675-675: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
678-678: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
684-684: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
685-685: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
689-689: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
1202-1202: UserReadSerializer may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
1911-1911: RiskAcceptance may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: test (3.12)
🔇 Additional comments (95)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts (3)
1-5: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.The necessary utilities and types are properly imported from both local utilities and SvelteKit.
6-15: Enhance error handling and add request validation.The current implementation directly forwards URL parameters and error responses, which could potentially expose sensitive information.
Please refer to the previous review comment for the suggested improvements regarding error handling and request validation.
16-23: Add type safety and pagination handling.The response data handling lacks type safety and proper pagination support.
Please refer to the previous review comment for the suggested improvements regarding type safety and pagination handling.
frontend/messages/en.json (1)
998-998: LGTM!The addition of the
stakeholderlocalization string follows the established naming and capitalization conventions.frontend/tests/functional/user-route.test.ts (1)
182-182:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify API compatibility with the new URL parameter format.
The URL parameter change from
objectTypetoobject_typealigns with snake_case convention but requires verification of backend API compatibility.Run the following script to check for any remaining occurrences of the old parameter format:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any remaining instances of 'objectType' in URL parameters # to ensure consistent migration to snake_case. # Search in TypeScript/JavaScript files rg -g '*.{ts,js,svelte}' 'objectType=' # Search in API route handlers rg -g '**/+server.ts' -g '**/+page.server.ts' 'objectType'Length of output: 97
Ensure Backend API Compatibility with Snake_Case URL Parameters
The change from
objectTypetoobject_typein the test reflects a broader effort to standardize URL parameters to snake_case. Although our automated search did not reveal any remaining instances ofobjectType, please perform a manual verification of the backend API implementations to ensure they expectobject_typeinstead ofobjectTypeand that no breaking changes occur.
- Confirm that all API route handlers and endpoint configurations have been updated to process
object_type.- Double-check integration tests or API documentation to verify the backend behavior aligns with this change.
frontend/src/params/filters.ts (1)
4-16: LGTM! Well-implemented parameter matcher with type safety.The implementation is clean and efficient:
- Uses Set for unique filter keys
- Handles case-insensitive matching
- Properly normalizes parameter format
- Type-safe with
satisfies ParamMatcherfrontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Form.svelte (1)
69-69: LGTM! Added null safety through optional chaining.The change prevents potential runtime errors when
datais undefined.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte (2)
2-2: Update Data Handling Import.The current import statement uses
@vincjo/datatables/remote, but the latest version (v2.5.0) replaces the remote module with@vincjo/datatables/server(withDataHandlerreplaced byTableHandler).
8-18: LGTM! Well-implemented null safety checks.The implementation properly handles undefined states and uses optional chaining for safe property access.
frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts (2)
14-14: LGTM! Simplified endpoint construction using nullish coalescing.The change elegantly handles the fallback to
model.urlModelwhenmodel.endpointUrlis null or undefined.
16-17: Add error handling for the main fetch request.The fetch request lacks error handling. Consider adding try-catch blocks and proper error responses.
backend/core/models.py (2)
737-745: Implementation follows the suggested optimization.The
has_updateproperty implementation correctly follows the previously suggested optimization by:
- Using
values_listto fetch only the version field- Using
order_byandfirst()to get the highest version- Properly handling the case when no stored libraries exist
747-760: Well-implemented subquery for efficient library update checks.The
updatable_librariesclassmethod efficiently:
- Uses a subquery to get the latest version for each URN
- Annotates each LoadedLibrary with its latest stored version
- Filters to return only libraries with available updates
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (1)
2-4: Good migration to remote DataHandler.The change to import from
@vincjo/datatables/remotealigns with the shift towards remote data handling.frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts (1)
780-787:❓ Verification inconclusive
LGTM! Consistent structure for library components.
The changes maintain symmetry between
stored-librariesandloaded-librariesentries, with both having the same component mappings.Let's verify that all references to these components are updated:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old "libraries" key. # Search for any remaining "libraries" references in component files rg -A 5 "libraries" "frontend/src/lib/components/" # Search for usage of LanguageDisplay and LibraryActions components rg -A 5 "LanguageDisplay|LibraryActions" "frontend/src/lib/components/"Length of output: 5420
Update Verification: Library Components Consistency
The updates in
frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.tsmaintain a consistent mapping for bothstored-librariesandloaded-libraries—both usingLanguageDisplayandLibraryActions—which is reflected in the component usage (e.g., in ModelTable and LibraryActions files). Note, however, that there are still several occurrences of the term “libraries” in other parts of the code (such as in navigation data innavData.tsand in form fields likeload_missing_libraries), which may be intentional. Please manually verify that these remaining references align with the overall design and expected routing/UI behavior.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (2)
12-15: LGTM! Encapsulated page navigation logic.The
setPagefunction properly encapsulates the page navigation logic and ensures the handler is invalidated after page changes.
17-21: LGTM! Reset pagination on navigation.The
afterNavigatehook correctly resets the page to 1 when the URL changes, preventing stale pagination state.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte (2)
9-12: LGTM! Proper page reset on rows per page change.The
setRowsPerPagefunction correctly resets the page to 1 and invalidates the handler when the rows per page value changes.
14-16: LGTM! Handle pagination edge cases.The reactive statement properly handles the case where the current page's start index exceeds the total count by adjusting the page number.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte (3)
2-2: Update the Import Path for Remote Data HandlingThe current import path may not be correct based on your Svelte version.
13-15: LGTM! Great accessibility improvements.The changes enhance accessibility and user experience by adding descriptive placeholder text and proper ARIA attributes.
17-22: Fix potential memory leak in debouncing implementation.The current debouncing implementation may lead to memory leaks.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte (4)
2-2: Dependency Check: Ensure @vincjo/datatables is Explicitly Declared
8-13: LGTM! Well-structured sort handling.The changes improve sort handling by properly managing state and invalidating data after sorting.
21-26: LGTM! Great accessibility improvements.The changes enhance accessibility by adding proper role and aria-sort attributes for better screen reader support.
32-34: LGTM! Good visual and accessibility improvements.The changes improve both visual feedback and accessibility by using consistent class names and properly hiding decorative elements.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (2)
107-126: Add error handling for DataHandler initialization.The DataHandler initialization and onChange callback lack error handling.
174-174: Fix filter visibility logic and add defensive checks.The filter visibility check needs improvement:
- Add defensive checks for undefined filters
- Fix the visibility condition evaluation
backend/ebios_rm/views.py (6)
222-222: Database Index Check forlikelihoodFilter Field
167-170: LGTM! Well-implemented action method.The new
pertinenceaction follows the established pattern and provides choices in a consistent format.
175-175:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify database indexes for new filter field.
The addition of the
categoryfilter field could impact query performance.Run the following script to check for database indexes:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for indexes on category field in Stakeholder model rg -A 5 -B 5 'class Stakeholder|class Meta' -g '*.py' backend/Length of output: 65601
Verify DB index on the "category" field
The addition of "category" to the filterset (used in Stakeholder views) may lead to slower queries if the underlying database field isn’t indexed. The grep output didn’t reveal any explicit index setup for "category." Please verify the Stakeholder model (likely in
backend/ebios_rm/models.py) to confirm whether the "category" field is configured with an index (e.g., viadb_index=Trueor through an index defined in the model’s Meta). If an index is missing, consider adding one or updating the migration to ensure optimal performance.
204-210:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify database indexes for new filter field.
The addition of the
stakeholdersfilter field could impact query performance.Run the following script to check for database indexes:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for indexes on stakeholders field in AttackPath model rg -A 5 -B 5 'class AttackPath|class Meta' -g '*.py' backend/Length of output: 65600
Action Required: Verify proper indexing for the new filter field.
The addition of the
stakeholdersfield in theAttackPathFiltercould introduce performance issues if filtering on this field isn’t optimized by the appropriate database indexes. The verification script did not reveal any explicit indexes on this field. Please confirm that:
- The underlying many-to-many relation (or the reverse relationship from the
Stakeholdermodel) used by thestakeholdersfield is backed by a join table with proper indexing on both foreign keys.- If necessary, add or adjust database indexes to ensure efficient query performance when filtering by
stakeholders.
136-143:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify database indexes for new filter fields.
The addition of new filter fields (
risk_origin,motivation,feared_events) could impact query performance.Run the following script to check for database indexes:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for indexes on new filter fields in RoTo model rg -A 5 -B 5 'class RoTo|class Meta' -g '*.py' backend/Length of output: 65594
Action: Verify database indexes for the newly filterable fields
It looks like the current filter configuration in
backend/ebios_rm/views.pyforRoToFilternow only includes"motivation"and"feared_events"(while the original snippet mentioned"risk_origin"as well). Please confirm that:
- Either the removal of
"risk_origin"was intentional—or add an index if you plan to restore it.- The underlying database columns for
"motivation"and"feared_events"are appropriately indexed to support efficient filtering given their use in query conditions.Let me know if you need to add or adjust indexes in the models’ Meta classes or via migrations.
97-104:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify database indexes for new filter fields.
The addition of new filter fields (
assets,gravity,qualifications) could impact query performance.Run the following script to check for database indexes:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for indexes on new filter fields in FearedEvent model rg -A 5 -B 5 'class FearedEvent|class Meta' -g '*.py' backend/Length of output: 65601
Verify database indexes for new filter fields
The new filter fields (
assets,gravity, andqualifications) added to theFearedEventViewSetcould impact query performance. Please verify that the corresponding database columns (or the many-to-many join tables, where applicable) in theFearedEventmodel have the appropriate indexes. If they aren’t already indexed—either via explicitdb_index=Truesettings or as part of automatically managed indexes for relationship tables—consider adding the necessary indexes to ensure efficient filtering.frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (36)
1-3: Imported component and type look correct.
It’s good to seeAutocompleteSelectandOptionintroduced for dynamic filter configurations. No immediate issues stand out.
18-18: Flexible filters definition is helpful.
The map-like structure{ [key: string]: ListViewFilterConfig | undefined }provides good extensibility for new filters.
23-26: Consistent naming for YES/NO options.
The short labels for the yes/no options are fine. If a user-facing label changes, keep it consistent across the app.
40-46: Endpoint usage for domain filter.
The endpoint'folders?content_type=DO&content_type=GL'might require re-verification if parameters or query strings need to be appended with standard naming (e.g.,?content_type=DO&content_type=GL).
49-56: Filtering labels through endpoint.
Ensure thefiltering-labelsendpoint returns the correct schema matchingoptionsLabelFieldandoptionsValueFieldif you plan to add them later.
78-87: Risk assessment status filter.
No immediate concerns. Follow up with additional unit tests if there's logic handling custom statuses.
89-98: Compliance assessment status filter.
Same suggestion as above: a DRY approach for dynamic label/value fields.
100-109: Applied control status filter.
No direct issues. Continues the consistent pattern used in other filters.
112-120: Treatment filter usage.
Check that'risk-scenarios/treatment'is correct if multiple query params are eventually necessary.
122-131: State filter for risk acceptances.
Matches standard usage. Keep consistent with the permission checks if necessary for restricted states.
134-141: Approver filter.
Retrieving a list of users withis_approver=truelooks straightforward. Verify user data doesn’t expose PII inadvertently.
144-150: Risk assessment filter.
Endpoint'risk-assessments'is consistent with naming. No obvious concerns.
152-160: Provider filter.
The label/value fields are used consistently. Looks good.
163-170: Threat filter.
Straightforward. Verifying that'threats'returns the needed fields for label vs. value is recommended.
173-179: Asset filter.
Confirm'assets'also returns consistent data for yourAutocompleteSelect.
182-188: Qualification filter usage.
No special concerns. Continues the pattern.
190-199: Risk impact filter referencingrisk-matrices/impact.
Ensure the label/value fields align properly with the response format.
201-210: Risk probability filter referencingrisk-matrices/probability.
Similar to above, confirm that the endpoint returns the correct fields.
213-219:is_selectedfilter using YES/NO.
Great usage of theYES_NO_OPTIONSconstant.
221-230: Risk origin filter.
No direct issues. Props forrisk-originare consistent with other endpoints.
233-239: Feared event filter.
Endpoint'feared-events'is descriptive. No immediate concerns.
242-250: Pertinence filter.
Check'ro-to/pertinence'for required label/value fields.
261-270: Risk level filter.
Check'risk-matrices/risk'for consistency with'impact'and'probability'endpoints.
296-299: STAKEHOLDER_FILTER usage.
Make sure'stakeholders'returns consistent label vs. value fields—currently using'email'or'str'? Confirm your endpoint.
337-347: Reference control category filter.
Exactly the same pattern. Keep or unify in a single factory to reduce duplication.
348-357: Stakeholder category filter.
Again, repeated pattern but it's okay if you plan to unify later.
456-458: New filter fields inrisk-assessments
folder,perimeter, andstatuslook appropriate for dynamic filtering.
494-496: New filter fields inrisk-scenarios: folder, perimeter, treatment
This expands existing filter coverage. Looks consistent.
500-501:current_levelandresidual_levelfilters inrisk-scenarios.
Using the sameRISK_LEVEL_FILTERfor both is a good approach for consistent logic.
648-651: Compliance assessments: new status filter
Matches the same status filter approach used for other compliance items. Good addition.
663-664:folderfilter for evidences
Ensures domain-based filtering. No issues.
767-769: Stakeholders: category filter
Again, identical usage of the category filter.
778-779: Strategic scenarios: gravity filter
ReusesRISK_IMPACT_FILTER. No concerns.
817-817:security-exceptionsdomain line
No direct changes to logic. Just ensure that referencing'folder'is correct for your domain usage.
[verified]
818-825: Confirm the purpose ofundefinedfilters inextra.
This is the same concern raised in a previous review comment. If they’re placeholders, mark them as TODO or remove if not needed.
827-834: Theas const satisfies ListViewFieldsConfigstatement.
This offers strong type-checking. Keep an eye on any TypeScript version changes to ensure it remains valid.backend/library/views.py (10)
1-1: Module-level imports: Confirm usage.
Double-check ifchainfromitertoolsis indeed used below. If not, remove it for clarity.
19-19: Importdjango_filtersas df
Good approach for shorter references in filters, but ensure it’s consistently used throughout the file.
43-67: NewStoredLibraryFilterSetclass.
- The multiple-choice filter for
object_typeis a neat approach.- The
filter_object_typemethod dynamically builds a union query. Test thoroughly with multiple object types.
71-71: Attachingfilterset_classtoStoredLibraryViewSet
Enables filtering onurn, locale, version, provider, object_type. No concerns.
132-132: Changed the import action to POST.
UsingPOSTis more REST-appropriate for creating a new resource (loading the library). Make sure the front-end references are updated accordingly.
239-291: NewLoadedLibraryFilterSetclass.
object_typefilter method uses nested logic withobjects_meta. Ensure correct queries for large data.has_updatesubquery approach is elegant for version comparison.
295-295: Attaching filterset_class toLoadedLibraryViewSet.
User's new filters can be tested thoroughly, especially with multiple locales or providers.
301-301: Updated search_fields for LoadedLibrary.
Aligns with typical usage for quick searching onname,description,urn.
303-306: Dynamic serializer selection inget_serializer_class.
ChoosingLoadedLibrarySerializerfor list andLoadedLibraryDetailedSerializerfor detail is consistent and keeps payload sizes smaller on listing.
399-404:available_updatesaction.
- Returns a list of libraries that have updates available.
- Good separation of concern. Also ensure the front-end can integrate this easily.
backend/core/views.py (15)
14-14: No issues detected.
153-153: Consider restricting orderable fields.
155-155: Looks good.Keeping a default empty list of
filterset_fieldscan be fine if you rely on custom filters or override it in subclasses.
290-301: Ensure explicit import ofPerimeter.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
295-295:
Perimetermay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
299-299:
Perimetermay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
309-309: Filter set assignment looks good.
652-671: Ensure explicit import ofRiskMatrix.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
654-654:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
655-655:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
659-659:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
672-681: Ensure explicit import ofRiskMatrix.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
674-674:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
675-675:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
678-678:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
682-701: Ensure explicit import ofRiskMatrix.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
684-684:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
685-685:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
689-689:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
1170-1170: New filter field added.Adding
"owner"tofilterset_fieldsbroadens filtering capabilities on theAppliedControlmodel. No issues detected.
1199-1206: Ensure explicit import ofUserReadSerializer.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
1202-1202:
UserReadSerializermay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
1910-1912: Ensure explicit import ofRiskAcceptance.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
1911-1911:
RiskAcceptancemay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
1916-1918: New boolean filter introduced.Filtering users by
is_applied_control_ownerwill be helpful for quickly isolating owners. Looks good.
1930-1932: Neat filtering logic.The filter method is straightforward and meets the new boolean filter’s needs.
3925-3925: Updated search fields look fine.Searching by
requirement__nameandrequirement__descriptionhelps quickly locate requirement assessments.
1669-1674:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify existence of new scenario fields.
These new filterset fields (
current_level,residual_level, etc.) must exist on theRiskScenariomodel. If they do not, runtime errors may occur or queries might fail.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Searching for references to current_level and residual_level in the codebase. ast-grep --pattern $'class RiskScenario { $$$ current_level: $_ residual_level: $_ $$$ }'Length of output: 98
Verify new scenario fields on the RiskScenario model
The earlier ast-grep run for
current_levelandresidual_levelreturned no output, so please manually verify that these new filterset fields (along withcurrent_impact,current_proba,residual_impact, andresidual_proba) are actually defined on theRiskScenariomodel. The absence of direct matches may indicate that these fields haven’t been added or that the search pattern needs adjustment. Verify the model’s definition (likely in the models file) to prevent potential runtime errors or query failures.
- Confirm that the
RiskScenariomodel includes definitions for:
current_levelresidual_level- And the other related fields
| export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params }) => { | ||
| const model = getModelInfo(params.model); | ||
| const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl ?? params.model}/${params.filter}/`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for missing model info.
The endpoint construction assumes that getModelInfo will always return valid data. Consider adding error handling for cases where the model info is not found.
export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params }) => {
const model = getModelInfo(params.model);
+ if (!model) {
+ error(400, `Invalid model: ${params.model}`);
+ }
const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl ?? params.model}/${params.filter}/`;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params }) => { | |
| const model = getModelInfo(params.model); | |
| const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl ?? params.model}/${params.filter}/`; | |
| export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params }) => { | |
| const model = getModelInfo(params.model); | |
| if (!model) { | |
| error(400, `Invalid model: ${params.model}`); | |
| } | |
| const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl ?? params.model}/${params.filter}/`; | |
| // ... rest of the code | |
| } |
| export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params, url }) => { | ||
| const model = getModelInfo('ebios-rm'); | ||
| const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl}${ | ||
| url.searchParams ? '?' + url.searchParams.toString() : '' | ||
| }`; | ||
|
|
||
| const res = await fetch(endpoint); | ||
| if (!res.ok) { | ||
| error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, await res.json()); | ||
| } | ||
| const data = await res.json(); | ||
|
|
||
| return new Response(JSON.stringify(data), { | ||
| status: res.status, | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json' | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
🧩 Analysis chain
Add rate limiting to prevent API abuse.
The endpoint is publicly accessible and could be vulnerable to abuse without proper rate limiting.
Consider implementing rate limiting using a middleware or service like Redis. Here's an example implementation:
+import { rateLimit } from '$lib/utils/rate-limit';
+
export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params, url }) => {
+ const clientIp = url.searchParams.get('clientIp') || 'unknown';
+ const rateLimitResult = await rateLimit(clientIp, {
+ points: 100, // Number of requests
+ duration: 60, // Per minute
+ });
+
+ if (!rateLimitResult.success) {
+ throw error(429, 'Too Many Requests');
+ }
+
const model = getModelInfo('ebios-rm');Let's check if rate limiting is already implemented elsewhere in the codebase:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for rate limiting implementations
rg -i "rate.?limit" -g "!{node_modules,dist,build}/*"Length of output: 9224
Rate Limiting is Required for This Public API Endpoint
The ebios-rm endpoint in frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts currently lacks any rate limiting, which leaves it vulnerable to potential abuse. We already employ rate limiting in other parts of the project (e.g., the authentication password reset endpoint uses sveltekit-rate-limiter), so reusing a similar mechanism here would ensure consistency and secure the endpoint.
Action Items:
- Integrate Rate Limiting: Add a rate limiting middleware or helper (for example, using the existing
sveltekit-rate-limiterlibrary or a custom utility from$lib/utils/rate-limit) to protect this endpoint. - Example Snippet:
+import { rateLimit } from '$lib/utils/rate-limit'; + +const clientIp = url.searchParams.get('clientIp') || 'unknown'; +const rateLimitResult = await rateLimit(clientIp, { + points: 100, // Allowed requests per minute + duration: 60, // 60 seconds duration +}); + +if (!rateLimitResult.success) { + throw error(429, 'Too Many Requests'); +}
- Consistency Check: If possible, align this implementation with how rate limiting is handled in the password reset endpoint (located at
frontend/src/routes/(authentication)/password-reset/+page.server.ts).
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params, url }) => { | |
| const model = getModelInfo('ebios-rm'); | |
| const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl}${ | |
| url.searchParams ? '?' + url.searchParams.toString() : '' | |
| }`; | |
| const res = await fetch(endpoint); | |
| if (!res.ok) { | |
| error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, await res.json()); | |
| } | |
| const data = await res.json(); | |
| return new Response(JSON.stringify(data), { | |
| status: res.status, | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json' | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| }; | |
| import { rateLimit } from '$lib/utils/rate-limit'; | |
| export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params, url }) => { | |
| const clientIp = url.searchParams.get('clientIp') || 'unknown'; | |
| const rateLimitResult = await rateLimit(clientIp, { | |
| points: 100, // Number of requests allowed per minute | |
| duration: 60, // Duration in seconds | |
| }); | |
| if (!rateLimitResult.success) { | |
| throw error(429, 'Too Many Requests'); | |
| } | |
| const model = getModelInfo('ebios-rm'); | |
| const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl}${ | |
| url.searchParams ? '?' + url.searchParams.toString() : '' | |
| }`; | |
| const res = await fetch(endpoint); | |
| if (!res.ok) { | |
| error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, await res.json()); | |
| } | |
| const data = await res.json(); | |
| return new Response(JSON.stringify(data), { | |
| status: res.status, | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json' | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| }; |
| try: | ||
| matrix.json_definition = json.loads(matrix.json_definition) | ||
| matrix.save() | ||
| except Exception as e: | ||
| if type(matrix.json_definition) is dict: | ||
| continue | ||
| print(f"Error converting matrix {matrix.id} to dict: {e}") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling in migration.
The current error handling could be improved to:
- Log errors instead of using print statements
- Include more context about the failure
- Handle potential data corruption scenarios
- try:
- matrix.json_definition = json.loads(matrix.json_definition)
- matrix.save()
- except Exception as e:
- if type(matrix.json_definition) is dict:
- continue
- print(f"Error converting matrix {matrix.id} to dict: {e}")
+ try:
+ if not isinstance(matrix.json_definition, dict):
+ matrix.json_definition = json.loads(matrix.json_definition)
+ matrix.save()
+ except Exception as e:
+ logger.error(
+ "Failed to convert matrix json_definition",
+ extra={
+ "matrix_id": matrix.id,
+ "error": str(e),
+ "current_value": matrix.json_definition
+ }
+ )
+ raise📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| try: | |
| matrix.json_definition = json.loads(matrix.json_definition) | |
| matrix.save() | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| if type(matrix.json_definition) is dict: | |
| continue | |
| print(f"Error converting matrix {matrix.id} to dict: {e}") | |
| try: | |
| if not isinstance(matrix.json_definition, dict): | |
| matrix.json_definition = json.loads(matrix.json_definition) | |
| matrix.save() | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| logger.error( | |
| "Failed to convert matrix json_definition", | |
| extra={ | |
| "matrix_id": matrix.id, | |
| "error": str(e), | |
| "current_value": matrix.json_definition | |
| } | |
| ) | |
| raise |
| const PERIMETER_STATUS_FILTER: ListViewFilterConfig = { | ||
| component: SelectFilter, | ||
| getColumn: (row) => row.lc_status, | ||
| extraProps: { | ||
| defaultOptionName: 'status' | ||
| }, | ||
| alwaysDisplay: true | ||
| component: AutocompleteSelect, | ||
| props: { | ||
| optionsEndpoint: 'perimeters/lc_status', | ||
| optionsLabelField: 'label', | ||
| optionsValueField: 'value', | ||
| label: 'status', | ||
| multiple: true | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Repeatable filter code: Consider DRY patterns.
PERIMETER_STATUS_FILTER uses a standard pattern of AutocompleteSelect with endpoint + multiple. Repeated logic emerges in many filters. You may centralize repeated logic in a helper factory or function.
| def locale(self, request): | ||
| locales = set( | ||
| chain.from_iterable([l.get_locales for l in StoredLibrary.objects.all()]) | ||
| ) | ||
| return Response({l: l for l in locales}) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
locale action with variable name l.
Static analysis warns about ambiguous variable name l. Rename l to locale_item or similar for clarity.
- locales = set(chain.from_iterable([l.get_locales for l in StoredLibrary.objects.all()]))
+ locales = set(chain.from_iterable([lib.get_locales for lib in StoredLibrary.objects.all()]))Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
230-230: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
232-232: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
| @@ -13,13 +16,14 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| from django.http import HttpResponse | |||
|
|
|||
| import django_filters as df | |||
| from core.helpers import get_sorted_requirement_nodes | |||
| from core.models import StoredLibrary, LoadedLibrary | |||
| from core.views import BaseModelViewSet | |||
| from iam.models import RoleAssignment, Folder, Permission | |||
| from library.validators import validate_file_extension | |||
| from .helpers import update_translations, update_translations_in_object | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
update_translations_in_object import is unused.
Similar to the static analysis hint, remove this import to reduce dead code.
- from .helpers import update_translations_in_objectCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
25-25: .helpers.update_translations_in_object imported but unused
Remove unused import: .helpers.update_translations_in_object
(F401)
| from django.db.models import F, Q, IntegerField, OuterRef, Subquery | ||
| from rest_framework import viewsets, status |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Unused imports flagged by static analysis.
viewsets and status from rest_framework appear unused. Remove them to keep the file concise.
- from rest_framework import viewsets, status
+ # from rest_framework import status # or remove entirely, if truly unneeded📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| from django.db.models import F, Q, IntegerField, OuterRef, Subquery | |
| from rest_framework import viewsets, status | |
| from django.db.models import F, Q, IntegerField, OuterRef, Subquery | |
| # from rest_framework import status # or remove entirely, if truly unneeded |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
5-5: rest_framework.viewsets imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
5-5: rest_framework.status imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
nas-tabchiche
force-pushed
the
CA-582-handle-backend-pagination
branch
from
4e33fe3 to
4b9eb0c
Compare
nas-tabchiche
force-pushed
the
CA-582-handle-backend-pagination
branch
from
1719ae9 to
01b272e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (1)
456-502:⚠️ Potential issueVerify aggregator filters in
listViewFields.
You have incrementally updatedfolder,perimeter,status,category, etc., referencing the relevant filter constants. Check that each column name precisely matches the keys in your data model. Typos here can lead to silent no-op filters.- folder: DOMAIN_FILTER, + folder: DOMAIN_FILTER, // ensure "folder" matches the data field used in each routeAlso applies to: 539-541, 572-572, 583-584, 648-648, 651-651, 663-663, 679-679, 681-681, 688-688, 690-691, 714-714, 767-767, 778-778, 810-810, 817-818, 829-834
♻️ Duplicate comments (10)
frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts (1)
16-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd error handling for the main fetch request.
The fetch request lacks error handling. Consider adding try-catch blocks and proper error responses.
+ try { const res = await event.fetch(endpoint); + if (!res.ok) { + throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data: ${res.statusText}`); + } const data = await res.json(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error fetching data:', error); + throw error; + }backend/core/migrations/0056_data_store_matrix_json_as_dict_not_str.py (1)
10-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance error handling in migration.
The current error handling could be improved to:
- Log errors instead of using print statements
- Include more context about the failure
- Handle potential data corruption scenarios
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
- try: - matrix.json_definition = json.loads(matrix.json_definition) - matrix.save() - except Exception as e: - if type(matrix.json_definition) is dict: - continue - print(f"Error converting matrix {matrix.id} to dict: {e}") + try: + if not isinstance(matrix.json_definition, dict): + matrix.json_definition = json.loads(matrix.json_definition) + matrix.save() + except Exception as e: + logger.error( + "Failed to convert matrix json_definition", + extra={ + "matrix_id": matrix.id, + "error": str(e), + "current_value": matrix.json_definition + } + ) + raisefrontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte (1)
2-2: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate import path to use the latest version.
Based on the latest documentation, the import path should be updated to use either the legacy path or migrate to the new version.
If using v1 (legacy):
-import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; +import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote';If migrating to v2:
-import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; +import type { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/server';frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte (1)
2-2: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate import path to use the latest version.
Based on the latest documentation, the import path should be updated to use either the legacy path or migrate to the new version.
If using v1 (legacy):
-import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; +import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote';If migrating to v2:
-import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; +import type { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/server';frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (1)
2-2: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate import path to use the latest version.
Based on the latest documentation, the import path should be updated to use either the legacy path or migrate to the new version.
If using v1 (legacy):
-import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; +import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote';If migrating to v2:
-import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; +import type { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/server';frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts (2)
6-8:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for missing model info.
The endpoint construction assumes that
getModelInfowill always return valid data.export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params }) => { const model = getModelInfo(params.model); + if (!model) { + error(400, `Invalid model: ${params.model}`); + } const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl ?? params.model}/${params.filter}/`;
16-24:⚠️ Potential issueImprove type checking robustness.
The current type check using
Object.values()[0]is fragile as it assumes the response object has at least one value.- const options = - typeof Object.values(optionsResponse)[0] === 'string' + const values = Object.values(optionsResponse); + const options = + values.length > 0 && typeof values[0] === 'string' ? Object.keys(optionsResponse) .map((key) => ({ label: optionsResponse[key], value: key })) .sort((a, b) => a.label.localeCompare(b.label)) - : optionsResponse; + : values.length === 0 ? [] : optionsResponse;frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (1)
24-48: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd ARIA labels to pagination buttons.
The pagination buttons need proper accessibility attributes.
Apply this diff to add ARIA labels:
- <button type="button" class:disabled={$pageNumber === 1} on:click={() => setPage('previous')}> + <button + type="button" + class:disabled={$pageNumber === 1} + on:click={() => setPage('previous')} + aria-label={m.previous()} + > {m.previous()} </button> {#if $pages === undefined} - <button type="button" on:click={() => setPage($pageNumber)}> + <button + type="button" + on:click={() => setPage($pageNumber)} + aria-label={`Page ${$pageNumber}`} + > {$pageNumber} </button> {:else} {#each $pages as page} - <button - type="button" - class:active={$pageNumber === page} - class:ellipse={page === null} - on:click={() => setPage(page)} - > + <button + type="button" + class:active={$pageNumber === page} + class:ellipse={page === null} + on:click={() => setPage(page)} + aria-label={page ? `Page ${page}` : 'More pages'} + aria-current={$pageNumber === page ? 'page' : undefined} + > {page ?? '...'} </button> {/each} {/if} - <button type="button" class:disabled={$pageNumber === $pageCount} on:click={() => setPage('next')}> + <button + type="button" + class:disabled={$pageNumber === $pageCount} + on:click={() => setPage('next')} + aria-label={m.next()} + > {m.next()} </button>frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte (1)
17-22:⚠️ Potential issueFix potential memory leak in debouncing implementation.
The current debouncing implementation may lead to memory leaks as timeouts are created but not properly cleared on subsequent input events.
Apply this diff to properly implement debouncing:
+let debounceTimeout: NodeJS.Timeout; on:input={() => { - const debounceTimeout = setTimeout(() => { + clearTimeout(debounceTimeout); + debounceTimeout = setTimeout(() => { handler.filter(value, filterBy); }, 300); - return () => clearTimeout(debounceTimeout); }}frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts (1)
32-55:⚠️ Potential issueAdd parameter validation and sanitization.
The
getParamsfunction needs input validation and value sanitization.Apply this diff to add validation and sanitization:
+const isPositiveNumber = (value: number) => Number.isInteger(value) && value >= 0; +const isValidSortDirection = (direction: string): boolean => ['asc', 'desc'].includes(direction); +const sanitizeValue = (value: unknown): string => { + const sanitized = encodeURIComponent(String(value)); + return sanitized.replace(/[!'()*]/g, c => '%' + c.charCodeAt(0).toString(16)); +}; const getParams = ({ offset, rowsPerPage, search, sort, filters }: State) => { const params = new URLSearchParams(); + if (!isPositiveNumber(offset)) throw new Error('Invalid offset value'); + if (!isPositiveNumber(rowsPerPage)) throw new Error('Invalid rowsPerPage value'); - params.set('offset', offset.toString() ?? '0'); - params.set('limit', rowsPerPage.toString() ?? '10'); + params.set('offset', offset.toString()); + params.set('limit', rowsPerPage.toString()); if (search) { - params.set('search', search); + params.set('search', sanitizeValue(search)); } if (sort) { + if (!isValidSortDirection(sort.direction)) { + throw new Error('Invalid sort direction'); + } params.set('ordering', `${sort.direction === 'desc' ? '-' : ''}${sort.orderBy}`); } if (filters) { for (const filter of filters) { const filterKey = filter.filterBy.toString(); if (Array.isArray(filter.value)) { for (const val of filter.value) { - params.append(filterKey, val.toString()); + params.append(filterKey, sanitizeValue(val)); } } else if (filter.value) { - params.append(filterKey, filter.value.toString()); + params.append(filterKey, sanitizeValue(filter.value)); } } } return params; };
🧹 Nitpick comments (30)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts (1)
8-10: Standardize API endpoint construction.The endpoint URL construction could be improved to handle edge cases.
- const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl}${ - url.searchParams ? '?' + url.searchParams.toString() : '' - }`; + const endpoint = new URL(`${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl}`); + url.searchParams.forEach((value, key) => { + endpoint.searchParams.append(key, value); + });frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.ts (1)
6-23: Consider adding pagination metadata to the response headers.Since this change is part of an effort to implement pagination, consider enhancing the endpoint by including pagination metadata in the response headers (e.g.,
X-Total-Count,X-Page-Size). This follows REST best practices and allows clients to implement pagination UI without parsing the response body.Here's how you could add pagination headers:
return new Response(JSON.stringify(data), { status: res.status, headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', + 'X-Total-Count': data.count?.toString() ?? '0', + 'X-Page-Size': data.page_size?.toString() ?? '0', + 'Access-Control-Expose-Headers': 'X-Total-Count, X-Page-Size' } });backend/ebios_rm/views.py (1)
167-170: Consider adding cache decorator for pertinence choices.Other choice-returning actions in this class use caching. Consider adding the
@method_decorator(cache_page(60 * LONG_CACHE_TTL))decorator to this action as well, since enumeration choices are static.+ @method_decorator(cache_page(60 * LONG_CACHE_TTL)) @action(detail=False, name="Get pertinence choices") def pertinence(self, request): return Response(dict(RoTo.Pertinence.choices))frontend/tests/functional/detailed/libraries.test.ts (1)
17-17: Document the library limit.The change to limit the number of libraries to 12 is a good performance optimization. Consider adding a comment explaining why this limit was chosen.
+ // Limit to 12 libraries to keep test execution time reasonable for (let i = 1; i < Math.min(12, libraries.length); i++) {frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (1)
7-7: Improve type safety for timeout variable.Using
anytype reduces type safety. Consider using a more specific type.-let timeout: any; +let timeout: ReturnType<typeof setTimeout> | undefined;frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (6)
107-122: Check for potential performance overhead in data mapping.
On initialization,source.body.map()merges each row with corresponding metadata. For large datasets, this might be expensive. Evaluate whether lazy loading or server-side transformation better suits your use case.
144-153: Initialize a blank Zod schema for filters.
UsingsuperFormwith an emptyz.object({})is valid but might limit server-side validation. If filters have specific constraints (e.g., numeric ranges), consider adding them.
161-161: AliasingtableURLModel.
Creating a separate variable forURLModelis consistent but check if referencing the same prop in multiple places remains necessary. It might be simpler to referenceURLModeldirectly, or keep the alias for clarity.
189-193: Invalidate and navigate.
Forcing a table invalidate and then redirecting (_goto($page.url)) might cause abrupt page reloads if data can’t be updated in place. Evaluate whether a partial update suffices to keep users on the same route.
208-208: Conditional display of filter button.
Hiding or showing the filter button is driven byhideFilters. If other conditions (e.g., user permissions) are needed, consider combining them.
395-395: Named slot "tail".
Providing a "tail" slot for additional actions or content is a useful extension point. Be sure that other custom slots do not accidentally conflict with the same name in containing components.frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (15)
49-55:LABELS_FILTER
Fetching fromfiltering-labelsand labeling with'filtering_labels'. Confirm you handle translation or user-friendly naming if these labels appear in the UI.
69-75:PERIMETER_FILTER
Ensure large perimeter lists are well-handled byAutocompleteSelect. If the dataset is large, consider server-side filtering to avoid performance degradations.
89-98:COMPLIANCE_ASSESSMENT_STATUS_FILTER
Check the'compliance-assessments/status'endpoint. If these statuses overlap with risk statuses or other enumerations, consider reusing a single endpoint or caching for performance.
100-109:APPLIED_CONTROL_STATUS_FILTER
Refers to'applied-controls/status'. For large codebases, centralizing these "status" endpoints might help avoid duplication.
164-169:THREAT_FILTER
Uses'threats'endpoint. If the threat list is large, consider the same approach to server-side or on-demand loading.
173-178:ASSET_FILTER
Requests'assets'. If asset counts are high, you may want to support incremental search.
190-198:RISK_IMPACT_FILTER
Labelled'gravity'with'risk-matrices/impact'. The naming mismatch between'gravity'and'impact'might confuse devs or users. Consider unifying these terms.
201-209:RISK_PROBABILITY_FILTER
Similarly references'risk-matrices/probability'. Check consistency with naming conventions:'likelihood'vs.'probability'.
233-238:FEARED_EVENT_FILTER
Points to'feared-events'. If these can become numerous, watch for performance.
242-249:PERTINENCE_FILTER
Uses'ro-to/pertinence'. Keep naming consistent if additionalro-tofilters are introduced.
272-281:CURRENT_CRITICALITY_FILTER
Marked as// TODO: TEST THIS. Offer to help with test coverage or remove the TODO if already done.Would you like me to open an issue or draft test cases for this filter?
284-293:RESIDUAL_CRITICALITY_FILTER
Likewise marked as// TODO: TEST THIS. Same suggestion to handle the TODO item for clarity.
297-303:STAKEHOLDER_FILTER
Uses'stakeholders'. Great approach for a dynamic stakeholder list. Consider how you handle partial matches or large result sets.
337-346:REFERENCE_CONTROL_CATEGORY_FILTER
Looks up'reference-controls/category'. Combine it with a general approach for reference data if other categories exist.
348-357:STAKEHOLDER_CATEGORY_FILTER
Likewise'stakeholders/category'. Revisit for performance if categories are frequently updated.backend/core/views.py (1)
160-169: Remove commented-out code.The commented-out
filterset_classproperty should be either implemented or removed to maintain code cleanliness.backend/library/views.py (3)
4-5: Clean up unused imports.The following imports are not used in the code:
viewsetsandstatusfromrest_frameworkupdate_translations_in_objectfrom.helpers-from rest_framework import viewsets, status +from rest_framework import status # Keep if needed for future use -from .helpers import update_translations, update_translations_in_object +from .helpers import update_translationsAlso applies to: 25-25
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
5-5:
rest_framework.viewsetsimported but unusedRemove unused import
(F401)
5-5:
rest_framework.statusimported but unusedRemove unused import
(F401)
228-233: Improve variable naming in locale action.The use of single-letter variable
lis ambiguous and makes the code harder to read.def locale(self, request): locales = set( - chain.from_iterable([l.get_locales for l in StoredLibrary.objects.all()]) + chain.from_iterable([lib.get_locales for lib in StoredLibrary.objects.all()]) ) - return Response({l: l for l in locales}) + return Response({locale: locale for locale in locales})🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
230-230: Ambiguous variable name:
l(E741)
232-232: Ambiguous variable name:
l(E741)
389-397: Standardize error response format.The error responses are inconsistent:
- Line 390: Plain text "libraryNotFound"
- Line 397: Comment suggests "We must make at least one error message"
Consider standardizing error responses to use a consistent JSON format:
- data="libraryNotFound", status=HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND + data={"error": "Library not found"}, status=HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND - error_msg, status=HTTP_422_UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY + {"error": error_msg}, status=HTTP_422_UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
backend/core/migrations/0055_alter_storedlibrary_content.py(1 hunks)backend/core/migrations/0056_data_store_matrix_json_as_dict_not_str.py(1 hunks)backend/core/models.py(3 hunks)backend/core/views.py(11 hunks)backend/ebios_rm/views.py(5 hunks)backend/library/utils.py(1 hunks)backend/library/views.py(6 hunks)frontend/messages/en.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/DetailView/DetailView.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte(3 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Form.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte(10 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts(15 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/types.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/params/filters.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+page.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/tests/functional/detailed/libraries.test.ts(1 hunks)frontend/tests/functional/user-route.test.ts(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- backend/core/migrations/0055_alter_storedlibrary_content.py
- frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte
- frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+page.svelte
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- frontend/src/lib/utils/types.ts
- frontend/src/lib/components/DetailView/DetailView.svelte
- frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte
- backend/core/models.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/library/views.py
5-5: rest_framework.viewsets imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
5-5: rest_framework.status imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
25-25: .helpers.update_translations_in_object imported but unused
Remove unused import: .helpers.update_translations_in_object
(F401)
230-230: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
232-232: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
backend/core/views.py
11-11: django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory imported but unused
Remove unused import: django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory
(F401)
295-295: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
299-299: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
308-308: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
654-654: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
655-655: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
659-659: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
674-674: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
675-675: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
678-678: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
684-684: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
685-685: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
689-689: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
1202-1202: UserReadSerializer may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
1911-1911: RiskAcceptance may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: build (3.12)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-functional-test (3.12)
🔇 Additional comments (80)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts (3)
6-15: Enhance error handling and add request validation.The current implementation directly forwards URL parameters and error responses, which could potentially expose sensitive information.
This issue was previously identified in past reviews. The suggested improvements include:
- Validating and sanitizing URL parameters
- Implementing specific error handling
- Adding request timeout
6-24: Add rate limiting to prevent API abuse.The endpoint lacks rate limiting protection, making it vulnerable to abuse.
This security concern was previously identified. The suggested improvement includes implementing rate limiting using the existing
sveltekit-rate-limiterlibrary or a custom utility.
16-23: Add type safety and pagination handling.The response data handling lacks type safety and proper pagination support.
This issue was previously identified. The suggested improvements include:
- Defining an interface for the expected response data structure
- Adding pagination metadata handling
- Implementing proper error types
backend/ebios_rm/views.py (5)
222-222: Ensure database index for likelihood filter field.The addition of the
"likelihood"filter field could impact query performance without proper indexing.
136-143:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify database indexes and relationship fields.
The addition of relationship fields like
"feared_events"and enumeration fields like"risk_origin"and"motivation"could impact query performance. Ensure:
- Foreign key and many-to-many fields are properly indexed
- Enumeration fields have appropriate database constraints
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the new RoTo filter fields have corresponding database indexes and constraints. # Search for relationship and enumeration field definitions rg 'feared_events|risk_origin|motivation' -A 5 -B 5 'class RoTo' # Search for index definitions in migration files fd -e py -d 3 . migrations/ -x rg -l 'db\..*Index.*(feared_events|risk_origin|motivation)'Length of output: 309
Manual Verification Required: Database Indexes & Constraints
The addition of relationship and enumeration fields—specifically
"feared_events","risk_origin", and"motivation"—could impact query performance if proper indexes and constraints are not in place. The automated checks did not yield conclusive results (errors indicate potential path mismatches for model and migration searches). Please manually verify that:
feared_events(likely representing a many-to-many or foreign key relationship) is properly indexed.risk_originandmotivation(enumeration fields) have the appropriate database constraints and, if necessary, indexing.- The migration files (typically under a directory like
backend/ebios_rm/migrations/) include the expected index definitions for these new fields.Once confirmed, please update the database schema if any indexes or constraints are missing.
97-104:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify database indexes for new filter fields.
The addition of
"assets","gravity", and"qualifications"filter fields could impact query performance. Ensure these fields are properly indexed in the database.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the new FearedEvent filter fields have corresponding database indexes. # Search for index definitions in models rg 'class Meta:|db_index = True|index = True' -A 5 -B 5 'class FearedEvent' # Search for index definitions in migration files fd -e py -d 3 . migrations/ -x rg -l 'db\..*Index.*(assets|gravity|qualifications)'Length of output: 320
Database Index Verification Required
The updated filter fields
"assets","gravity", and"qualifications"inFearedEventViewSet.filterset_fieldsmay affect query performance if they aren’t backed by database indexes. Automated scripts were inconclusive in locating index definitions for these fields—please verify manually that:
- The corresponding fields in the
FearedEventmodel (likely defined inbackend/ebios_rm/models.py) includedb_index=Trueor equivalent indexing.- The appropriate migration files (typically under
backend/ebios_rm/migrations/) have been generated to add indexes for these fields where necessary.Ensure that these indexes exist, or update the model/migration files accordingly to safeguard performance.
175-175:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify database constraints for category field.
The
"category"field appears to be an enumeration field. Ensure it has appropriate database constraints for the enumeration values.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the Stakeholder category field has appropriate constraints. # Search for category field definition and constraints rg 'category.*=.*models\.' -A 5 -B 5 'class Stakeholder'Length of output: 116
Action: Manually verify the database constraints for the
categoryfield.Our initial attempt to automatically locate the Stakeholder model definition (and thus the
categoryfield constraints) using ripgrep did not return any results. This suggests one of the following:
- The Stakeholder model might be defined in a different file (e.g., in
backend/ebios_rm/models.py) or under a slightly different naming convention.- The search pattern needs to be adjusted, or manual inspection is required.
To help further investigate, please run the following shell script to locate the Stakeholder model definition:
Once you’ve located the Stakeholder model, please verify that the
categoryfield is defined with appropriate enumeration constraints (for example, using Django’schoicesargument or equivalent database-level constraints).
🏁 Script executed:
[run_scripts] #!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the definition of the Stakeholder model. rg -e "class\s+Stakeholder\s*\(" -n .Length of output: 245
Action: Manually verify the database constraint configuration for the
categoryfield.It appears that the
Stakeholdermodel is defined inbackend/ebios_rm/models.py(around line 398). However, our automated search did not reveal any explicit database-level constraints (e.g., CheckConstraints) for thecategoryfield. Since this field is used as an enumeration in filtering, please confirm the following:
- That the field is defined with proper enumerated choices (e.g., via Django’s
choicesargument).- Whether additional database-level constraints (such as a CheckConstraint) have been set to enforce valid enumeration values.
- That the corresponding migration reflects these constraints, ensuring only allowed values are stored.
Please manually verify the model’s definition and migration files to ensure that the
categoryfield enforces the intended constraints on the database.
204-210:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify database indexes for stakeholders relationship field.
The addition of the
"stakeholders"relationship field could impact query performance. Ensure the relationship is properly indexed in the database.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the AttackPath stakeholders relationship field has corresponding database indexes. # Search for relationship field definition rg 'stakeholders.*=.*models\.' -A 5 -B 5 'class AttackPath' # Search for index definitions in migration files fd -e py -d 3 . migrations/ -x rg -l 'db\..*Index.*stakeholders'Length of output: 284
The previous verification command did not yield useful results due to path issues. The new script above will help locate the model definition, the
stakeholdersfield declaration, and any associated index definitions within the migration files. Please run the new script and manually verify the output to confirm that thestakeholdersrelationship field in the AttackPath model is properly indexed.
Action Required: Verify Database Indexing for
stakeholdersRelationship FieldThe added
"stakeholders"field establishes a relationship (likely many-to-many or foreign key) with the Stakeholder model, which could impact query performance if it isn’t properly indexed. Please ensure that:
- The AttackPath model correctly defines the
stakeholdersfield with appropriate parameters.- The relevant migration files in the app-specific
migrationsdirectories include necessary index definitions for this relationship.Manually verify these aspects by reviewing the model file where
AttackPathis defined and checking the corresponding migration files.
🏁 Script executed:
[run_scripts] #!/bin/bash echo "Searching for AttackPath model definition in the repository:" rg -n "class AttackPath" . echo "Searching for stakeholders field definition in all Python files:" rg -n "stakeholders\s*=" . echo "Searching migration files for potential index definitions related to stakeholders:" find . -path "*/migrations/*.py" -exec rg -n "Index.*stakeholders" {} +Length of output: 1662
Action Required: Manual Verification of Stakeholders Indexing
The
"stakeholders"field in theAttackPathmodel (defined inbackend/ebios_rm/models.pyaround line 581) is a ManyToManyField. Our automated search did not reveal explicit index definitions in the migration files, which is expected if Django is auto-generating the join table indexes.Please manually verify that the auto-generated join table for the
stakeholdersrelationship has the appropriate indexes on its foreign key columns to ensure optimal query performance.frontend/messages/en.json (1)
998-998: LGTM!The new localization entry for "stakeholder" is properly formatted and follows the alphabetical ordering convention.
frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Form.svelte (1)
69-69: LGTM!The addition of optional chaining for
data?.datais a good defensive programming practice that prevents potential runtime errors whendatais null or undefined.frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts (1)
14-14: LGTM!The use of the nullish coalescing operator (
??) simplifies the endpoint URL construction while maintaining the same functionality.frontend/src/params/filters.ts (1)
4-16: LGTM! Well-structured parameter validation.The implementation is efficient and follows best practices by using Set for unique values and O(1) lookups, properly normalizing parameters, and implementing the ParamMatcher type correctly.
backend/library/utils.py (1)
541-541:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify type safety of library content.
The direct assignment of
self._library.contentassumes it's already a dictionary. This could lead to runtime errors if the content is still a JSON string.Run the following script to check the usage of
contentfield in the codebase:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check how content is processed before reaching this point # Search for content field assignments ast-grep --pattern 'content = $_' # Search for content field type hints rg -A 5 'content:\s*\w+'Length of output: 7034
Ensure Library Content is Parsed Correctly
The change inLibraryImporter.initnow directly assignsself._library.contentwithout parsing, assuming that the content is already a dictionary. Our investigation shows that while the model defines the content as a JSON field (e.g., inbackend/core/models.py), some test cases (such as inbackend/app_tests/api/test_utils.py) still rely onjson.loads(...), which suggests that in some contexts the content might be provided as a JSON string.
- Verify that all assignments to
self._library.content(including those in tests or mocks) result in a native Python object rather than a raw JSON string.- If there’s any possibility of receiving a JSON string, consider adding a type-check or a fallback conversion to ensure type safety.
frontend/tests/functional/user-route.test.ts (2)
15-31: LGTM! Improved test reliability with modal handling.The changes enhance test robustness by:
- Ensuring network requests are complete
- Systematically handling different types of modals
- Preventing UI interaction blockers
199-199: LGTM! Standardized URL parameter format.The change from
objectTypetoobject_typealigns with common API conventions and maintains consistency with other URL parameters.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte (1)
8-18: LGTM! Improved error handling.The changes enhance error handling by:
- Adding a check for undefined rowCount
- Using optional chaining for safer property access
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte (2)
9-12: LGTM! Improved pagination control.The changes enhance pagination control by:
- Resetting page to 1 when rows per page changes
- Triggering data invalidation to refresh the view
- Properly binding the select element to the rowsPerPage value
Also applies to: 21-25
14-16: LGTM! Added safety check for page updates.The reactive statement ensures the page number is correctly adjusted when the total rows change.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (1)
9-15: LGTM! Added debouncing for search.The changes improve performance by:
- Implementing debouncing for search input
- Clearing previous timeout before setting new one
- Using appropriate delay (400ms) for search invalidation
Also applies to: 24-24
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts (1)
26-30: LGTM! Proper response formatting.The response is correctly formatted with:
- JSON stringification of options
- Appropriate content type header
frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts (1)
780-787:✅ Verification successful
LGTM! Consistent structure for library components.
The changes maintain symmetry between
stored-librariesandloaded-librariesentries, with both having the same component mappings.Let's verify that all references to these components are updated:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old "libraries" key. # Search for any remaining "libraries" references in component files rg -A 5 "libraries" "frontend/src/lib/components/" # Search for usage of LanguageDisplay and LibraryActions components rg -A 5 "LanguageDisplay|LibraryActions" "frontend/src/lib/components/"Length of output: 5420
LGTM – Consistency Confirmed
After executing the verification scripts, the usage ofLanguageDisplayandLibraryActionsin bothstored-librariesandloaded-librariesis consistent across the codebase. The references in components likeDetailView.svelte,ModelTable.svelte, andLibraryActions.sveltecorrectly use the updated keys. Note that references to the plain term “libraries” (for example, innavData.ts) appear to be contextually separate and do not indicate an oversight in this change.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (2)
12-15: LGTM! Improved page navigation logic.The new
setPagefunction encapsulates the page setting logic and invalidation in a single place, making the code more maintainable.
17-21: LGTM! Added navigation handling.The
afterNavigatehook ensures that the page is reset to 1 when the URL changes, preventing stale pagination state.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte (1)
13-15: LGTM! Improved accessibility and user experience.The changes enhance accessibility with ARIA labels and provide better context with the dynamic placeholder.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte (4)
2-2: Check the new submodule import.
This line changes the import path from@vincjo/datatablesto@vincjo/datatables/remote. Verify that this submodule is included in your dependencies and confirm its compatibility with the rest of the table components.
17-18: Recheck theactiveclass binding.
Sinceidentifieris derived fromorderBy?.toString(), this condition may never match if$sort?.orderByholds a pure string column name. Ensure both sides share the same data type and value.
21-26: Good accessibility improvement.
Applyingrole="columnheader"andaria-sortclarifies the current sort state for assistive technologies—this is a valuable addition for accessibility.
32-34: Conditional classes are clear.
Usingclass:ascandclass:descbased on$sort?.directionis straightforward, and marking this element asaria-hidden="true"helps avoid redundant screen reader content (with the sorted state already announced inaria-sort).frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (19)
2-9: Validate imports and their usage.
Multiple new or updated imports (e.g.,_goto,ISO_8601_REGEX,CUSTOM_ACTIONS_COMPONENT,onMount,tableA11y) are introduced. Ensure they are all strictly needed and have the correct references in your code. Unused imports can be removed to reduce bundle size.
11-20: Accessibility enhancer implementation.
ImportingtableA11ysuggests better keyboard or screen-reader support for table navigation. Confirm that the action is properly initialized and does not conflict with other event handlers (e.g., row click).
42-42: Initializesourcewith default structure.
Providing a defaultheadandbodyhelps avoid undefined errors. This is a good practice to ensure stability when data is not yet loaded.
67-73: New properties for detail navigation and filtering.
The propsidentifierField,deleteForm,URLModel,detailQueryParameter, andhideFiltersadd useful customization. Make sure that all referencing components correctly handle these new props—particularlyURLModelif your logic depends on dynamic model names.
123-124: Properly re-initialize table state.
Fetching rows fromDataHandlerintorowsand trackinginvalidateTablestate is a neat pattern for caching. Confirm thatrowsis updated wheneverinvalidateTabletoggles to avoid stale data.
126-126: Event-based data loading.
Attaching a callback tohandler.onChangeis a straightforward way to re-fetch data on state changes. Keep an eye on potential race conditions if multiple calls occur quickly, though typically Svelte updates remain sequential.
128-134: Respect initial sort parameters.
CallingsortAscorsortDescbased onorderBy.directionensures the table loads in the correct sort order. This logic successfully aligns the client-side sort with the provided prop.
136-140:preventDeletelogic.
The function disallows deletion if certain metadata fields are set or if the library type is disallowed. Verify that these conditions align with your business rules; specifically watch forrow.meta.builtin,urn, orreference_count.
142-142: Capture initial URL filters.
ReadingsearchParams.entries()is a good approach for extracting query-based filters on page load. Double-check that each param is recognized in the filter definitions.
155-159: Popup filter config is succinct.
Using@skeletonlabs/skeletonpopup helps keep the filter UI separate. Ensure that the target ID (popupFilter) matches the popup’sdata-popupattribute.
167-168: Filtering fields.
filteredFieldsandfilterValuesprovide a systematic approach for dynamic filters. This is a clean solution—just confirm the filter keys align with the data structure insource.headorsource.meta.
174-174: Conditional hide for filters.
hideFilters = hideFilters || !Object.entries(filters).some(([_, filter]) => !filter.hide);merges user’s request to hide filters with actual filter availability. Make sure hidden filters won't be reactivated unexpectedly.
179-180: Callhandler.filter(...)with array values.
Passing an array of filter strings per field is consistent with theDataHandlerfiltering convention. Confirm that the backend or remote library expects arrays rather than single strings.
197-200: Check user permissions for object creation.
canCreateObjectis derived fromuser.permissions. Confirm these permission checks remain in sync if the server’s security model changes. Also ensure you handle missing or undefineduser.permissions.
224-240: Dynamically render filters with<SuperForm>.
Mapping eachfilteredFieldsentry to a component is flexible. Confirm thatfilters[field].componentis always defined, and handle cases where a filter is unexpectedly missing acomponentorprops.
275-275: Use row-level meta fallback.
{@const meta = row?.meta ?? row}ensures fallback ifmetais missing. This approach is robust for defensive checks—good practice.
341-341: Date/time recognition via regex.
UsingISO_8601_REGEX.test(value)to detect date strings is convenient but might yield false positives if unexpected formats appear. Add broader validation if user input can contain partial dates or ambiguous strings.
371-371: Introduce constantactionsURLModel.
DestructuringURLModelfor actions clarifies the difference between general and row-specific references. This is helpful for readability.
401-401: Closing named slot.
Ensure you close the "tail" slot in the correct scope. This is properly placed so that it only affectsTableRowActions.frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (26)
1-3: ImportingAutocompleteSelectandOptiontype.
These imports suggest a switch to dynamic, autocomplete-driven filtering. Make sure thatAutocompleteSelectusage is consistent with theOptioninterface fromsvelte-multiselect.
7-7: Unified filter props structure.
Using{ label, optionsEndpoint, multiple, options }standardizes the filter definition. This helps keep each filter’s configuration self-contained.
18-18: Optionalfiltersmap field.
Allowingundefinedin thefiltersobject is flexible but be sure to handleundefinedgracefully where the UI expects a filter config.
23-27: Reusable yes/no options.
YES_NO_OPTIONSis a helpful constant for boolean-based filters. This reduces duplication across multiple filter definitions.
29-36:PERIMETER_STATUS_FILTER
Fetching options fromperimeters/lc_statusis consistent with the domain logic. Verify the endpoint is correct and that the needed label/value fields are present in the response.
40-45:DOMAIN_FILTER
Pulling domain data fromfoldersis flexible. Ensurecontent_typequery parameters (DO,GL) remain stable in your backend.
59-66:PRIORITY_FILTER
optionsEndpoint: 'applied-controls/priority'implies a known set of priorities. Test the multiple selection logic to ensure correct results from the backend.
78-86:RISK_ASSESSMENT_STATUS_FILTER
Same pattern: label, multiple selection, etc. Confirm that'risk-assessments/status'endpoint returns data in the expected[{ label, value }, ...]format.
112-119:TREATMENT_FILTER
Filtering by'risk-scenarios/treatment'is a key step in scenario analysis. Confirm thatmultiple: trueis appropriate if you allow multiple treatments.
123-130:STATE_FILTER
Specifies'risk-acceptances/state'. This likely manages accepted vs. pending states. Confirm the UI properly differentiates these states.
134-140:APPROVER_FILTER
optionsEndpoint: 'users?is_approver=true'is a specialized user subset. Double-check you handle pagination if many approvers exist.
144-149:RISK_ASSESSMENT_FILTER
Pointing to'risk-assessments'might list all existing risk assessments. Confirm that identification fields (label, str, etc.) match the expected display in the filter.
153-160:PROVIDER_FILTER
Provider is loaded from'stored-libraries/provider'. Ensure that library providers are consistent with other naming (e.g.,'loaded-libraries/provider') if needed.
182-187:QUALIFICATION_FILTER
Refers to'qualifications'. Confirm these are carefully typed and reflect dynamic updates if qualifications frequently change.
213-218:IS_SELECTED_FILTER
UsesYES_NO_OPTIONS. This is a quick way to filter boolean states. Good approach.
221-229:RISK_ORIGIN_FILTER
Endpoint'ro-to/risk-origin'. Ensure that combos with otherro_to_fields remain consistent.
253-258:ENTITY_FILTER
Fetches'entities'. Confirm the label logic for entity display (e.g.,entity.namevs.entity.str) is correct.
261-269:RISK_LEVEL_FILTER
optionsEndpoint: 'risk-matrices/risk'. This matches the existing pattern. Ensure combined usage ofcurrent_levelandresidual_levelis tested thoroughly.
307-312:FRAMEWORK_FILTER
Points to'frameworks'. If frameworks are outside the user’s permission scope, ensure the endpoint restricts data correctly.
316-323:LANGUAGE_FILTER
Refers to'stored-libraries/locale'. Double-check that language codes or locale keys match the rest of the system.
327-334:ASSET_TYPE_FILTER
'assets/type'must remain consistent in naming and structure.
360-367:CSF_FUNCTION_FILTER
csfFunctionis set to'reference-controls/csf_function'. If you add new frameworks, keep these definitions up to date.
371-378:OWNER_FILTER
Selecting owners from'applied-controls/owner'is consistent with your approach. Keep the label/value consistent if you mix user email vs. ID.
382-387:HAS_UPDATE_FILTER
UsesYES_NO_OPTIONS. Good for distinguishing libraries with updates from those without.
390-399:LIBRARY_TYPE_FILTER
Requests'stored-libraries/object_type', storinglabelas both label and value. Confirm you won't need numeric IDs or separate references in the future.
401-401:listViewFieldsstructure expanded.
This large object adds or modifies multiple filter entries. Carefully confirm each endpoint, especially wherefolder: DOMAIN_FILTERorlocale: LANGUAGE_FILTERis introduced, to ensure no naming collisions.backend/core/views.py (4)
153-153: Consider restricting orderable fields.Setting
ordering_fields = "__all__"allows ordering by any model field, which could expose sensitive data or impact performance.
290-301: Ensure explicit import of Perimeter model.The
PerimeterFilterimplementation looks good, but thePerimetermodel should be explicitly imported rather than relying on star imports.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
295-295:
Perimetermay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
299-299:
Perimetermay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
652-700: Ensure explicit import of RiskMatrix model and simplify dictionary operations.The new risk level, impact, and probability actions are well-implemented, but there are a few improvements to consider:
Consider simplifying the dictionary operations:
- undefined = {-1: "--"} - _choices = { - i: name - for i, name in enumerate( - x["name"] for x in matrix.json_definition["risk"] - ) - } - choices = undefined | _choices + choices = {-1: "--"} | { + i: name + for i, name in enumerate( + x["name"] for x in matrix.json_definition["risk"] + ) + }🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
654-654:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
655-655:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
659-659:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
674-674:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
675-675:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
678-678:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
684-684:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
685-685:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
689-689:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
748-756: LGTM! Good improvements to filtering and search capabilities.The changes enhance the filtering and search capabilities:
- Added filtering_labels to VulnerabilityViewSet
- Updated search fields in RequirementAssessmentViewSet to use requirement fields
- Added is_applied_control_owner filter to UserFilter
Also applies to: 925-925, 1916-1918
backend/library/views.py (3)
43-67: Well-implemented filter set!The
StoredLibraryFilterSetimplementation is clean and efficient:
- Uses Q objects for dynamic filtering
- Properly handles multiple object types
- Clear field definitions in Meta class
132-133: Good change: Using POST for import_library.The change from GET to POST for the import_library action better aligns with REST principles, as importing is a state-changing operation.
239-291: Excellent implementation of LoadedLibraryFilterSet!The filter set implementation is sophisticated and efficient:
- Smart use of subqueries for version comparison
- Proper handling of null cases in has_update filter
- Efficient object_type filtering using Q objects
| @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params, url }) => { | |||
| if (!res.ok) { | |||
| error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, await res.json()); | |||
| } | |||
| const data = await res.json().then((res) => res.results); | |||
| const data = await res.json(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify the impact of returning the complete response.
The change now returns the entire API response instead of extracting just the results property. This could affect downstream components expecting only the results array.
Run the following script to identify components that might be affected by this change:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find components that might expect the results property
# Look for usage of this endpoint and access to results property
# Search for components importing or fetching from this route
rg -l "thirdparty_urlmodels" src/
# Search for components accessing 'results' property
ast-grep --pattern 'data.results'Length of output: 1845
Action Required: Fix Response Structure to Match Expected Contract
After verifying the codebase, it’s clear that multiple downstream components expect the endpoint response to include a results property (e.g., see usages in /frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+layout.server.ts, /analytics/+page.server.ts, and risk-scenarios endpoints). Returning the complete API response instead of extracting data.results may break these consumers.
- Recommendation:
- Revisit the change in
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.tsand either revert to extractingdata.resultsor update all downstream components to handle the full response object. - Verify whether the additional fields in the full API response are needed downstream; if not, returning only
data.resultswould be the safest option.
- Revisit the change in
| @@ -1,60 +1,50 @@ | |||
| <script lang="ts"> | |||
| import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables'; | |||
| import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Update import to the current remote pagination module.
Please update the import to match the latest guidance. For current (v2) implementation, replace the legacy import:
🌐 Web query:
What is the correct import path for DataHandler in @vincjo/datatables for remote pagination?
💡 Result:
For remote pagination using @vincjo/datatables, there are two valid import paths depending on your library version:
v1 (Legacy):
import { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote';v2 (Current):
import { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/server';Key differences:
- Version 2 renamed
DataHandlertoTableHandler[3][7] - Server-side features moved to dedicated
/serversubpath in v2[3][4] - Legacy imports maintain compatibility through
/legacynamespace[3][7]
For new implementations, the recommended approach with v2 would be:
import { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/server';
const table = new TableHandler([], {
rowsPerPage: 5
});
table.load(async (state) => {
// Fetch data from remote source using state.pageNumber
const response = await fetch(`/api/data?page=${state.pageNumber}`);
return response.json();
});This handles server-side pagination through the load() method that triggers on page changes[3][4].
Citations:
- 1: https://qiita.com/miyazaki-dev/items/ecb2ddb5546e65fafb2a
- 2: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@vincjo/datatables?activeTab=code
- 3: https://vincjo.fr/datatables/docs/server/getting-started/migration
- 4: https://vincjo.fr/datatables/docs/client/getting-started/overview
- 5: https://datatables.net/forums/discussion/71491/how-to-implement-a-pagination-model-and-make-use-of-specifically-formatted-jsons
- 6: https://githubhelp.com/vincjo/svelte-simple-datatables
- 7: https://vincjo.fr/datatables/docs/client/getting-started/migration
- 8: https://npm.io/package/svelte-simple-datatables
- 9: https://qiita.com/miyazaki-dev/items/e5033d1396ba1ecaa982
- 10: https://datatables.net/forums/discussion/32031/pagination-with-server-side-processing
Action required: Update Import for v2 Remote Pagination
- Replace the legacy import:
with the current v2 import:
import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote';
import { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/server';
- This aligns with the updated naming (switching from
DataHandlertoTableHandler) and the new module path for server-side pagination.
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| <script lang="ts"> | |||
| import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables'; | |||
| import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Action: Update the Import Path for Remote Data Handling.
According to the latest documentation for Svelte 4 with server-side pagination, you should import DataHandler from the legacy path:
🌐 Web query:
What is the correct import path for DataHandler in @vincjo/datatables for remote pagination?
💡 Result:
To implement remote pagination with @vincjo/datatables, use these imports based on your Svelte version and library version:
For Svelte 5 + v2.x
// Server-side pagination (remote data)
import { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/server';
// Client-side pagination
import { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables';For Svelte 4 + Legacy v1.x
// Server-side pagination (remote data)
import { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote';
// Client-side pagination
import { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy';Key differences:
- v2.x uses
TableHandlerinstead ofDataHandler[3][7] - Server-side features now live in
/serversubpath[3] - Runes replace stores in v2 (
table.rowsvs$rows)[7] - Migration path allows gradual upgrades via
/legacyimports[3][7]
Example remote pagination setup (v2):
const table = new TableHandler([], { rowsPerPage: 5 });
table.load(async (state) => {
const res = await fetch(`/api/data?page=${state.currentPage}`);
return res.json();
});For Laravel-style pagination with properties like current_page and next_page_url, you'll need to map these to the handler's state object during data loading[5][10].
Citations:
- 1: https://qiita.com/miyazaki-dev/items/ecb2ddb5546e65fafb2a
- 2: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@vincjo/datatables?activeTab=code
- 3: https://vincjo.fr/datatables/docs/server/getting-started/migration
- 4: https://vincjo.fr/datatables/docs/client/getting-started/overview
- 5: https://datatables.net/forums/discussion/71491/how-to-implement-a-pagination-model-and-make-use-of-specifically-formatted-jsons
- 6: https://githubhelp.com/vincjo/svelte-simple-datatables
- 7: https://vincjo.fr/datatables/docs/client/getting-started/migration
- 8: https://npm.io/package/svelte-simple-datatables
- 9: https://qiita.com/miyazaki-dev/items/e5033d1396ba1ecaa982
- 10: https://datatables.net/forums/discussion/32031/pagination-with-server-side-processing
Action Required: Update the remote import path in frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte
- Issue: The current import uses
@vincjo/datatables/remote, which is not correct for Svelte 4 with Legacy v1.x. - Resolution: Change the import to use the legacy path. Update the line from:
to
import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote';import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote'; - Reference: This change aligns with the latest documentation for Svelte 4 + Legacy v1.x for remote pagination.
| export const loadTableData = async (state: State, URLModel: urlModel, endpoint: string) => { | ||
| const response = await fetch(`${endpoint}?${getParams(state)}`).then((res) => res.json()); | ||
| state.setTotalRows(response.count); | ||
|
|
||
| const bodyData = tableSourceMapper(response.results, listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body); | ||
|
|
||
| const headData: Record<string, string> = listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body.reduce( | ||
| (obj, key, index) => { | ||
| obj[key] = listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].head[index]; | ||
| return obj; | ||
| }, | ||
| {} | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const table: TableSource = { | ||
| head: headData, | ||
| body: bodyData, | ||
| meta: response // metaData | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| return table.body.map((item: Record<string, any>, index: number) => { | ||
| return { ...item, meta: table?.meta?.results ? { ...table.meta.results[index] } : undefined }; | ||
| }); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and improve type safety.
The loadTableData function needs error handling and better type definitions.
Apply this diff to add error handling and improve type safety:
+interface TableItem {
+ [key: string]: string | number | boolean;
+ meta?: Record<string, unknown>;
+}
export const loadTableData = async (state: State, URLModel: urlModel, endpoint: string) => {
+ try {
+ const res = await fetch(`${endpoint}?${getParams(state)}`);
+ if (!res.ok) {
+ throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${res.status}`);
+ }
+ const response = await res.json();
+ if (!response?.results) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid response format');
+ }
state.setTotalRows(response.count);
const bodyData = tableSourceMapper(response.results, listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body);
const headData: Record<string, string> = listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body.reduce(
(obj, key, index) => {
obj[key] = listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].head[index];
return obj;
},
{}
);
const table: TableSource = {
head: headData,
body: bodyData,
meta: response
};
- return table.body.map((item: Record<string, any>, index: number) => {
+ return table.body.map((item: TableItem, index: number) => {
return { ...item, meta: table?.meta?.results ? { ...table.meta.results[index] } : undefined };
});
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Error loading table data:', error);
+ throw error;
+ }
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const loadTableData = async (state: State, URLModel: urlModel, endpoint: string) => { | |
| const response = await fetch(`${endpoint}?${getParams(state)}`).then((res) => res.json()); | |
| state.setTotalRows(response.count); | |
| const bodyData = tableSourceMapper(response.results, listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body); | |
| const headData: Record<string, string> = listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body.reduce( | |
| (obj, key, index) => { | |
| obj[key] = listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].head[index]; | |
| return obj; | |
| }, | |
| {} | |
| ); | |
| const table: TableSource = { | |
| head: headData, | |
| body: bodyData, | |
| meta: response // metaData | |
| }; | |
| return table.body.map((item: Record<string, any>, index: number) => { | |
| return { ...item, meta: table?.meta?.results ? { ...table.meta.results[index] } : undefined }; | |
| }); | |
| }; | |
| interface TableItem { | |
| [key: string]: string | number | boolean; | |
| meta?: Record<string, unknown>; | |
| } | |
| export const loadTableData = async (state: State, URLModel: urlModel, endpoint: string) => { | |
| try { | |
| const res = await fetch(`${endpoint}?${getParams(state)}`); | |
| if (!res.ok) { | |
| throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${res.status}`); | |
| } | |
| const response = await res.json(); | |
| if (!response?.results) { | |
| throw new Error('Invalid response format'); | |
| } | |
| state.setTotalRows(response.count); | |
| const bodyData = tableSourceMapper(response.results, listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body); | |
| const headData: Record<string, string> = listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body.reduce( | |
| (obj, key, index) => { | |
| obj[key] = listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].head[index]; | |
| return obj; | |
| }, | |
| {} | |
| ); | |
| const table: TableSource = { | |
| head: headData, | |
| body: bodyData, | |
| meta: response | |
| }; | |
| return table.body.map((item: TableItem, index: number) => { | |
| return { ...item, meta: table?.meta?.results ? { ...table.meta.results[index] } : undefined }; | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Error loading table data:', error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| }; |
|
|
||
| const sort = handler.getSort(); | ||
| const update = () => { | ||
| handler.sort(orderBy); | ||
| handler.invalidate(); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Potential mismatch in identifier usage.
Using orderBy?.toString() may yield [object Object] if orderBy is an object. If you intend to match $sort?.orderBy with a specific field of orderBy, consider using orderBy?.identifier or another field instead.
-const identifier = orderBy?.toString();
+const identifier = orderBy?.identifier ?? '';Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| class GenericFilterSet(df.FilterSet): | ||
| class Meta: | ||
| model = None # This will be set dynamically via filterset_factory. | ||
| fields = "__all__" | ||
| filter_overrides = { | ||
| models.CharField: { | ||
| "filter_class": df.MultipleChoiceFilter, | ||
| "extra": lambda f: { | ||
| "lookup_expr": "icontains", | ||
| # If your model field defines choices, they will be used: | ||
| "choices": f.choices if hasattr(f, "choices") else None, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider restricting filter fields for security and performance.
The GenericFilterSet class allows filtering on all model fields by default (fields = "__all__"). This could potentially expose sensitive data or impact performance.
Consider:
- Explicitly listing allowed filter fields in child classes
- Adding a base set of safe fields that can be extended
class GenericFilterSet(df.FilterSet):
class Meta:
- model = None # This will be set dynamically via filterset_factory.
- fields = "__all__"
+ model = None
+ fields = [] # Override in child classes with explicit safe fields📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| class GenericFilterSet(df.FilterSet): | |
| class Meta: | |
| model = None # This will be set dynamically via filterset_factory. | |
| fields = "__all__" | |
| filter_overrides = { | |
| models.CharField: { | |
| "filter_class": df.MultipleChoiceFilter, | |
| "extra": lambda f: { | |
| "lookup_expr": "icontains", | |
| # If your model field defines choices, they will be used: | |
| "choices": f.choices if hasattr(f, "choices") else None, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| } | |
| class GenericFilterSet(df.FilterSet): | |
| class Meta: | |
| model = None | |
| fields = [] # Override in child classes with explicit safe fields | |
| filter_overrides = { | |
| models.CharField: { | |
| "filter_class": df.MultipleChoiceFilter, | |
| "extra": lambda f: { | |
| "lookup_expr": "icontains", | |
| # If your model field defines choices, they will be used: | |
| "choices": f.choices if hasattr(f, "choices") else None, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| } |
This reverts commit 01b272e.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
backend/library/views.py (1)
389-390: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove error message handling in _update method.
The comments indicate that error messages need improvement:
- Messages should be returned as JSON consistently
- At least one error message is required
- return Response( - data="libraryNotFound", status=HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND - ) # Error messages could be returned as JSON instead + return Response( + {"error": "Library not found"}, + status=HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND + ) error_msg = library.update() if error_msg is None: return Response(status=HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT) return Response( - error_msg, status=HTTP_422_UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY - ) # We must make at least one error message + {"error": error_msg or "Failed to update library"}, + status=HTTP_422_UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY + )Also applies to: 396-397
♻️ Duplicate comments (8)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts (2)
6-8:⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation and error handling.
The current implementation lacks validation for route parameters and error handling for invalid model info.
export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params }) => { + // Validate route parameters + if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(params.model) || !/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(params.filter)) { + error(400, 'Invalid model or filter parameter'); + } + const model = getModelInfo(params.model); + if (!model) { + error(400, `Invalid model: ${params.model}`); + } const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl ?? params.model}/${params.filter}/`;
14-24:⚠️ Potential issueImprove type safety and robustness in response transformation.
The current type checking and transformation logic needs improvement for better reliability.
+ interface Option { + label: string; + value: string; + } + const optionsResponse = await res.json(); + + // Validate response structure + if (typeof optionsResponse !== 'object' || optionsResponse === null) { + error(500, 'Invalid response format'); + } + const values = Object.values(optionsResponse); const options = - typeof Object.values(optionsResponse)[0] === 'string' + values.length > 0 && typeof values[0] === 'string' ? Object.keys(optionsResponse) .map((key) => ({ label: optionsResponse[key], value: key - })) + } as Option)) .sort((a, b) => a.label.localeCompare(b.label)) - : optionsResponse; + : values.length === 0 ? [] : optionsResponse;backend/core/migrations/0056_data_store_matrix_json_as_dict_not_str.py (1)
10-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance error handling in migration.
The current error handling could be improved to:
- Log errors instead of using print statements
- Include more context about the failure
- Handle potential data corruption scenarios
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
- try: - matrix.json_definition = json.loads(matrix.json_definition) - matrix.save() - except Exception as e: - if type(matrix.json_definition) is dict: - continue - print(f"Error converting matrix {matrix.id} to dict: {e}") + try: + if not isinstance(matrix.json_definition, dict): + matrix.json_definition = json.loads(matrix.json_definition) + matrix.save() + except Exception as e: + logger.error( + "Failed to convert matrix json_definition", + extra={ + "matrix_id": matrix.id, + "error": str(e), + "current_value": matrix.json_definition + } + ) + raisebackend/core/views.py (1)
130-144: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider restricting filter fields for security and performance.
The
GenericFilterSetclass allows filtering on all model fields by default (fields = "__all__"). This could potentially expose sensitive data or impact performance.Apply this diff to restrict filter fields:
class GenericFilterSet(df.FilterSet): class Meta: - model = None # This will be set dynamically via filterset_factory. - fields = "__all__" + model = None + fields = [] # Override in child classes with explicit safe fieldsfrontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte (1)
2-2:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate import path for compatibility with Svelte 4.
The current import path needs to be updated to match the correct version for Svelte 4 with Legacy v1.x.
-import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; +import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote';frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte (1)
7-7:⚠️ Potential issueFix potential object serialization issue.
Using
toString()on an object might yield[object Object]. Consider accessing a specific field iforderByis an object.-const identifier = orderBy?.toString(); +const identifier = typeof orderBy === 'object' ? orderBy?.identifier : orderBy?.toString() ?? '';frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte (2)
2-2:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate import path for compatibility with Svelte 4.
The current import path needs to be updated to match the correct version for Svelte 4 with Legacy v1.x.
-import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; +import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote';
17-22:⚠️ Potential issueFix memory leak in debouncing implementation.
The current implementation doesn't clear previous timeouts, which can lead to memory leaks.
+let debounceTimeout: NodeJS.Timeout; on:input={() => { + clearTimeout(debounceTimeout); - const debounceTimeout = setTimeout(() => { + debounceTimeout = setTimeout(() => { handler.filter(value, filterBy); }, 300); - return () => clearTimeout(debounceTimeout); }}
🧹 Nitpick comments (15)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts (3)
1-5: Add type definitions for better type safety.Consider adding TypeScript interfaces to define the expected shapes of the model info and response data.
import { error, type NumericRange } from '@sveltejs/kit'; import type { RequestHandler } from './$types'; import { BASE_API_URL } from '$lib/utils/constants'; import { getModelInfo } from '$lib/utils/crud'; + +interface ModelInfo { + endpointUrl?: string; + // Add other model info properties +} + +interface ApiResponse { + [key: string]: string | unknown; +}
10-13: Enhance error handling with detailed messages.Consider providing more informative error messages and handling network failures.
- const res = await fetch(endpoint); + let res; + try { + res = await fetch(endpoint); + } catch (e) { + error(500, `Network error: ${e.message}`); + } if (!res.ok) { - error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, await res.json()); + const errorData = await res.json().catch(() => ({ message: 'Unknown error' })); + error( + res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, + `API Error (${res.status}): ${JSON.stringify(errorData)}` + ); }
26-31: Add security and caching headers.Consider adding appropriate headers for security and caching control.
return new Response(JSON.stringify(options), { headers: { - 'Content-Type': 'application/json' + 'Content-Type': 'application/json', + 'Cache-Control': 'no-store, max-age=0', + 'X-Content-Type-Options': 'nosniff', + 'X-Frame-Options': 'DENY' } });backend/ebios_rm/views.py (1)
167-170: Consider adding cache decorator for consistency.Other choice-returning actions in this class use the
@method_decorator(cache_page)for caching. Consider adding it here for consistency and performance.+ @method_decorator(cache_page(60 * LONG_CACHE_TTL)) @action(detail=False, name="Get pertinence choices") def pertinence(self, request): return Response(dict(RoTo.Pertinence.choices))backend/library/views.py (2)
49-55: Optimize filter_object_type method.The current implementation builds a Q object for each value. Consider using a single Q object with OR conditions:
def filter_object_type(self, queryset, name, value: list[str]): - union_qs = Q() - _value = {f"content__{v}__isnull": False for v in value} - for item in _value: - union_qs |= Q(**{item: _value[item]}) - - return queryset.filter(union_qs) + return queryset.filter( + reduce( + operator.or_, + [Q(**{f"content__{v}__isnull": False}) for v in value] + ) + )Don't forget to add the imports:
import operator from functools import reduce
246-265: Add docstring to explain the complex filtering logic.The
filter_has_updatemethod implements complex version comparison logic. Consider adding a docstring to explain the implementation.def filter_has_update(self, queryset, name, value): + """ + Filter libraries based on available updates. + + Args: + queryset: The base queryset + name: The name of the filter (unused) + value: Boolean indicating whether to filter for libraries with (True) or without (False) updates + + Returns: + Filtered queryset containing libraries that match the update criteria + """ # Build a subquery to get the highest version for the given urn. max_version_subquery = ( StoredLibrary.objects.filter(urn=OuterRef("urn"))frontend/src/params/filters.ts (1)
1-16: Well-structured parameter matcher implementation!The code effectively collects and validates filter keys. Consider adding a type annotation for clarity:
-const filterKeys = new Set<string>(); +const filterKeys = new Set<string>(); // Set of valid filter keys from listViewFieldsfrontend/tests/utils/page-content.ts (1)
153-154: Good addition of timeout for improved test reliability!Consider extracting the timeout value as a constant for better maintainability:
+const IMPORT_BUTTON_TIMEOUT = 3000; // ms - Time to wait for import button to be visible + importItemButton(value: string, language?: string) { return language - ? this.getRow(value, language).getByTestId('tablerow-import-button', { timeout: 3000 }) - : this.getRow(value).getByTestId('tablerow-import-button', { timeout: 3000 }); + ? this.getRow(value, language).getByTestId('tablerow-import-button', { timeout: IMPORT_BUTTON_TIMEOUT }) + : this.getRow(value).getByTestId('tablerow-import-button', { timeout: IMPORT_BUTTON_TIMEOUT }); }frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (1)
7-7: Use a more specific type for the timeout variable.Replace
anywithNodeJS.Timeout | undefinedfor better type safety.-let timeout: any; +let timeout: NodeJS.Timeout | undefined;frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts (1)
7-8: Use async/await consistently instead of mixing promise chains.The code currently mixes
async/awaitwith.then(...). For better consistency, consider usingawait fetch(...)entirely, making error handling and readability more straightforward.-export const loadTableData = async (state: State, URLModel: urlModel, endpoint: string) => { - const response = await fetch(`${endpoint}?${getParams(state)}`).then((res) => res.json()); +export const loadTableData = async (state: State, URLModel: urlModel, endpoint: string) => { + const res = await fetch(`${endpoint}?${getParams(state)}`); + const response = await res.json();frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (3)
107-125: Add error handling for DataHandler initialization and transformations.While initializing the
DataHandlerwithsource.body.map(...), an error could occur if thesourceshape is unexpected (e.g., missingmetafields). Incorporate a try/catch block to handle unexpected data shapes gracefully.
174-175: Ensure filters are correctly hidden or displayed.The logic
hideFilters = hideFilters || !Object.entries(filters).some(...)might obscure the original reason for hiding filters. Validate that reassigninghideFiltershere aligns with the intended UI state.
275-275: Clarify fallback torowwhenrow.metais undefined.
{@const meta = row?.meta ?? row}can cause confusion ifrowitself has keys that might conflict. Consider structuring the data more predictably or clarifying usage patterns formeta.frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (2)
272-272: Address the// TODO: TEST THISreminders.The
CURRENT_CRITICALITY_FILTERandRESIDUAL_CRITICALITY_FILTERlines have// TODO: TEST THIS. Ensuring thorough coverage in the test suite is essential. Would you like assistance writing or improving the tests?Also applies to: 284-284
817-825: Remove or clarify unusedrisk,impact, etc. filters.These filters are explicitly set to
undefinedunderextra→filters. Unless they’re placeholders, consider removing them or implementing them if needed, to avoid confusion in the codebase.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (32)
backend/core/migrations/0055_alter_storedlibrary_content.py(1 hunks)backend/core/migrations/0056_data_store_matrix_json_as_dict_not_str.py(1 hunks)backend/core/models.py(3 hunks)backend/core/views.py(11 hunks)backend/ebios_rm/views.py(5 hunks)backend/library/utils.py(1 hunks)backend/library/views.py(6 hunks)frontend/messages/en.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/DetailView/DetailView.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte(3 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Form.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte(10 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts(15 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/types.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/params/filters.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+page.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/tests/functional/detailed/libraries.test.ts(1 hunks)frontend/tests/functional/user-route.test.ts(2 hunks)frontend/tests/utils/page-content.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- backend/core/migrations/0055_alter_storedlibrary_content.py
- frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- frontend/src/lib/utils/types.ts
- frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte
- frontend/src/lib/components/DetailView/DetailView.svelte
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/core/views.py
11-11: django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory imported but unused
Remove unused import: django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory
(F401)
295-295: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
299-299: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
308-308: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
654-654: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
655-655: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
659-659: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
674-674: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
675-675: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
678-678: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
684-684: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
685-685: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
689-689: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
1202-1202: UserReadSerializer may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
1911-1911: RiskAcceptance may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
backend/library/views.py
5-5: rest_framework.viewsets imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
5-5: rest_framework.status imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
25-25: .helpers.update_translations_in_object imported but unused
Remove unused import: .helpers.update_translations_in_object
(F401)
230-230: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
232-232: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: build (3.12)
- GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
🔇 Additional comments (39)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts (2)
1-5: LGTM!The imports are well-organized and provide all necessary dependencies for the implementation.
6-24: Previous review comments are still valid and should be addressed.The implementation needs improvements in several areas that were already highlighted in previous reviews. Those comments remain valid and should be addressed:
- Error handling and request validation
- Type safety and pagination handling
- Rate limiting
Additionally, consider these new improvements:
- Add CORS headers to control access to the API
- Implement caching headers to improve performance
Apply this diff to add CORS and caching headers:
return new Response(JSON.stringify(data), { status: res.status, headers: { - 'Content-Type': 'application/json' + 'Content-Type': 'application/json', + 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': process.env.ALLOWED_ORIGINS || '*', + 'Access-Control-Allow-Methods': 'GET', + 'Cache-Control': 'public, max-age=300', + 'Vary': 'Origin' } });frontend/tests/functional/detailed/libraries.test.ts (1)
17-17: LGTM! Good performance optimization.Limiting the number of libraries to test to a maximum of 12 is a sensible optimization that maintains test validity while reducing execution time.
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+page.svelte (1)
59-59: LGTM! Consistent URL parameter naming.The change from camelCase to snake_case in URL parameters (
objectType→object_type) aligns with the standardization effort across the codebase.Also applies to: 75-75
frontend/tests/functional/user-route.test.ts (2)
15-31: LGTM! Improved test reliability with modal handling.The added code improves test robustness by:
- Waiting for network idle state
- Systematically handling and dismissing any blocking modals
- Cleaning up the UI state before proceeding with tests
199-199: LGTM! Consistent URL parameter naming.The change from camelCase to snake_case in URL parameters (
objectType→object_type) maintains consistency with the standardization across the codebase.frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.ts (1)
15-15:✅ Verification successful
Verify pagination implementation and update documentation.
While a previous review flagged concerns about returning the complete response, this change appears intentional as part of implementing pagination for API calls. The complete response likely includes necessary pagination metadata (e.g.,
count,next,previous).Consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments to document the expected response structure
- Creating TypeScript interfaces for the paginated response
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify pagination implementation # Look for pagination-related changes and usage # Search for pagination metadata usage rg -A 5 'data\.(count|next|previous)' # Search for table components that might need pagination ast-grep --pattern 'Table { $$$ data={$_} $$$ }'Length of output: 1029
Pagination implementation verified – documentation update is recommended.
The updated code intentionally returns the complete JSON response to support pagination, which includes the required metadata (e.g.,
count,next,previous). Verification confirms that these fields are being used in the layout components (e.g., in+layout.svelte). Although the previous concern about returning the full response was valid, the change aligns with the overall pagination objectives. It would be beneficial to document this behavior further with JSDoc comments and/or TypeScript interfaces to clearly specify the expected response structure.backend/library/utils.py (1)
541-541: LGTM! Simplified library content handling.The change correctly aligns with the
StoredLibrary.store_library_contentmethod wherelibrary_objectsis already in the correct format, eliminating the need for JSON parsing.backend/core/models.py (1)
737-760: LGTM! Efficient implementation of library update checks.The implementation is well-optimized:
- Uses
values_listto fetch only the version field- Uses
order_byandfirst()to get the highest version- Uses subqueries and annotations for bulk operations
backend/ebios_rm/views.py (5)
175-175: LGTM!Adding the
categoryfilter field is a logical extension for stakeholder filtering.
222-222: Ensure database index for likelihood field.The addition of the
likelihoodfilter field requires proper database indexing for optimal query performance.This concern was previously raised in a past review. Please refer to the existing comment about verifying the database index for the
likelihoodfield.
97-104:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify database indexes for new filter fields.
The addition of
assets,gravity, andqualificationsfilter fields could impact query performance.Run this script to check for database indexes:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the new FearedEvent filter fields have corresponding database indexes. # Search for index definitions in models rg 'class FearedEvent|db_index = True|index = True' -A 10 -B 5 backend/ebios_rm/models.py # Search for index definitions in migrations fd -e py -d 3 backend/ebios_rm/migrations -x rg -l 'db\..*Index.*(assets|gravity|qualifications)'Length of output: 1087
Manual Verification Required for Database Indexes on New Filter Fields
The automated search for index definitions on the new filter fields (
assets,gravity, andqualifications) returned limited information. The snippet fromFearedEventconfirms theassetsfield is defined as a ManyToMany relation, but there’s no clear evidence that indexes exist for filtering on these fields, and the output forgravityandqualificationswas inconclusive.
- Confirm that the ManyToMany intermediary table for
assetsis properly indexed.- Verify in both the model definitions and migration files that
gravityandqualificationseither have explicit indexes or are managed in a way that avoids performance degradation.- Please manually review these points and update the database indexes if necessary.
136-143:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify database indexes and relationship fields.
The addition of relationship fields like
feared_eventsand enumeration fields likerisk_originandmotivationcould impact query performance.Run this script to check for database indexes and relationship fields:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the new RoTo filter fields have corresponding database indexes and proper relationship fields. # Search for relationship fields and index definitions in models rg 'class RoTo|feared_events\s*=|risk_origin\s*=|motivation\s*=|db_index = True|index = True' -A 10 -B 5 backend/ebios_rm/models.py # Search for index definitions in migrations fd -e py -d 3 backend/ebios_rm/migrations -x rg -l 'db\..*Index.*(feared_events|risk_origin|motivation)'Length of output: 2728
Verify database indexes and relationship field configurations.
Our analysis of
backend/ebios_rm/models.pyconfirms that the new filter fields (feared_events,risk_origin, andmotivation) are defined without explicit indexes. Additionally, searches in the migrations did not reveal any index definitions for these fields. Given that relationship fields and fields frequently used in filtering can impact query performance, please verify if:
- The absence of explicit indexes was intentional.
- Additional indexing is required to optimize queries involving these fields.
204-210:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify database indexes for stakeholders relationship.
The addition of the
stakeholdersrelationship field could impact query performance.Run this script to check for database indexes and relationship fields:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the stakeholders relationship field has proper database indexes. # Search for relationship fields and index definitions in models rg 'class AttackPath|stakeholders\s*=|db_index = True|index = True' -A 10 -B 5 backend/ebios_rm/models.py # Search for index definitions in migrations fd -e py -d 3 backend/ebios_rm/migrations -x rg -l 'db\..*Index.*stakeholders'Length of output: 1666
Ensure proper indexing for the
stakeholdersrelationship.The addition of the
stakeholdersManyToMany field in theAttackPathmodel creates an intermediary join table that Django typically indexes automatically. However, to guard against potential performance issues, please verify that the expected database indexes are in place. Note that the previous migration search command encountered errors. To re-check the migrations for any explicit index definitions involving thestakeholdersfield, please run the following corrected script:#!/bin/bash # Corrected command to verify index definitions related to the 'stakeholders' field in migration files. echo "Searching for index definitions involving 'stakeholders' in migrations..." fd --full-path 'backend/ebios_rm/migrations' -e py -x rg -l 'stakeholders'After running this, verify manually whether the intermediary table for the ManyToMany relationship has the necessary indexes.
backend/core/views.py (5)
290-301: Replace star import with explicit Perimeter import.The current implementation relies on star imports for the Perimeter model. For better code maintainability and to avoid potential naming conflicts, use explicit imports.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
295-295:
Perimetermay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
299-299:
Perimetermay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
652-700: Add caching and replace star imports.The risk level, impact, and probability choice actions are well-implemented, but consider:
- Adding caching using
@method_decorator(cache_page)like other similar methods- Replacing star imports with explicit imports for RiskMatrix
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
654-654:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
655-655:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
659-659:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
674-674:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
675-675:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
678-678:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
684-684:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
685-685:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
689-689:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
1199-1205: Add caching and replace star imports.The owner action is well-implemented, but consider:
- Adding caching using
@method_decorator(cache_page)like other similar methods- Replacing star imports with explicit imports for UserReadSerializer
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
1202-1202:
UserReadSerializermay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
1909-1912: Replace star import with explicit RiskAcceptance import.The state choices action is well-implemented, but replace the star import with an explicit import for better code maintainability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
1911-1911:
RiskAcceptancemay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
3925-3925: LGTM! Improved search functionality.The update to search_fields to include
requirement__nameandrequirement__descriptionimproves the search functionality by allowing searches across related fields.backend/library/views.py (4)
4-5: Clean up unused imports.The following imports are not used in the code:
viewsetsfromrest_frameworkstatusfromrest_frameworkupdate_translations_in_objectfrom.helpers-from rest_framework import viewsets, status +from rest_framework import viewsets # Remove if truly unused -from .helpers import update_translations_in_object +from .helpers import update_translationsAlso applies to: 25-25
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
5-5:
rest_framework.viewsetsimported but unusedRemove unused import
(F401)
5-5:
rest_framework.statusimported but unusedRemove unused import
(F401)
132-133: Good change: Using POST for import_library.The change from GET to POST for the import operation aligns with REST principles, as it modifies server-side state.
228-233: Fix ambiguous variable names in locale method.The use of single-letter variable
lis ambiguous and flagged by static analysis.def locale(self, request): locales = set( - chain.from_iterable([l.get_locales for l in StoredLibrary.objects.all()]) + chain.from_iterable([lib.get_locales for lib in StoredLibrary.objects.all()]) ) - return Response({l: l for l in locales}) + return Response({locale: locale for locale in locales})🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
230-230: Ambiguous variable name:
l(E741)
232-232: Ambiguous variable name:
l(E741)
399-403: Good addition: Available updates endpoint.The new endpoint provides a clean way to check for library updates. The implementation is concise and efficient.
frontend/messages/en.json (1)
998-998: LGTM!The new localization entry for "stakeholder" is properly formatted and follows the established pattern.
frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Form.svelte (1)
69-69: Great use of optional chaining!The change improves code robustness by safely handling cases where
datamight be undefined, preventing potential runtime errors.frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts (2)
14-14: LGTM! Clean endpoint URL construction.The use of the nullish coalescing operator (
??) simplifies the code while maintaining the same functionality.
16-17: Add error handling for the main fetch request.The fetch request lacks error handling. Consider adding try-catch blocks and proper error responses.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (1)
9-15: LGTM! Good debounce implementation.The debounce mechanism helps prevent excessive API calls by delaying the invalidation until the user stops typing.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte (2)
8-18: LGTM! Robust null checks and undefined handling.The implementation safely handles undefined states and uses optional chaining for better error prevention.
2-2: Update import to the current remote pagination module.Please update the import to match the latest guidance. For current (v2) implementation, replace the legacy import.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (2)
12-21: LGTM! Clean pagination logic with URL sync.The
setPagefunction nicely encapsulates the page setting logic, and theafterNavigatehook ensures proper synchronization with URL changes.
24-50: Add ARIA labels to pagination buttons.The pagination buttons need proper accessibility attributes.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte (1)
9-16: LGTM! Well-structured pagination logic.The implementation correctly:
- Resets to page 1 when rows per page changes
- Handles edge cases when current page exceeds total pages
frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts (1)
780-787: LGTM! Consistent structure for library components.The changes maintain symmetry between
stored-librariesandloaded-librariesentries, with both having the same component mappings.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte (1)
21-26: LGTM! Enhanced accessibility with ARIA attributes.Good addition of
role="columnheader"and dynamicaria-sortattributes for better screen reader support.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte (1)
13-15: LGTM! Enhanced accessibility with ARIA attributes.Good addition of descriptive placeholder, aria-label, and role attributes for better screen reader support.
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts (1)
27-29: Validate presence ofresponse.results.The code destructures
response.results, but ifresponselacks aresultsfield, subsequent usage could lead to runtime errors. Check forresponse.resultsbefore mapping.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (1)
67-71: Make primary props optional or defaulted only if needed.
identifierField,deleteForm, andURLModelshare the same block of code. IfURLModeloridentifierFieldare essential for navigation or actions, consider validating or asserting they are defined to avoid potential reference errors.frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (1)
829-834: ValidateFilterKeysusage in codebase.
FilterKeysis a powerful mapped type, but confirm it’s used consistently throughout the application for type checking. If not, consider referencing it in filter-consuming components or remove it if unnecessary.
| class BaseModelViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet): | ||
| filter_backends = [ | ||
| DjangoFilterBackend, | ||
| filters.SearchFilter, | ||
| filters.OrderingFilter, | ||
| ] | ||
| ordering = ["created_at"] | ||
| ordering_fields = ordering | ||
| ordering_fields = "__all__" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider restricting orderable fields.
Setting ordering_fields = "__all__" allows ordering by any model field, which could expose sensitive data or impact performance. Consider explicitly listing safe fields that can be used for ordering.
| @@ -1,25 +1,37 @@ | |||
| <script lang="ts"> | |||
| import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables'; | |||
| import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update import path for compatibility with Svelte 4.
The current import path needs to be updated to match the correct version for Svelte 4 with Legacy v1.x.
-import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote';
+import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; | |
| import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote'; |
| const getParams = ({ offset, rowsPerPage, search, sort, filters }: State) => { | ||
| const params = new URLSearchParams(); | ||
| params.set('offset', offset.toString() ?? '0'); | ||
| params.set('limit', rowsPerPage.toString() ?? '10'); | ||
| if (search) { | ||
| params.set('search', search); | ||
| } | ||
| if (sort) { | ||
| params.set('ordering', `${sort.direction === 'desc' ? '-' : ''}${sort.orderBy}`); | ||
| } | ||
| if (filters) { | ||
| for (const filter of filters) { | ||
| const filterKey = filter.filterBy.toString(); | ||
| if (Array.isArray(filter.value)) { | ||
| for (const val of filter.value) { | ||
| params.append(filterKey, val.toString()); | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (filter.value) { | ||
| params.append(filterKey, filter.value.toString()); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return params; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider sanitizing and validating filter parameters.
Values like search and filter inputs are appended directly to URL params. In some contexts, this can be vulnerable. Consider encoding or stripping unexpected characters, as well as validating numeric pagination parameters for safety.
|
|
||
| export const loadTableData = async (state: State, URLModel: urlModel, endpoint: string) => { | ||
| const response = await fetch(`${endpoint}?${getParams(state)}`).then((res) => res.json()); | ||
| state.setTotalRows(response.count); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Provide error handling for fetch/JSON parsing.
Without handling HTTP errors or potential JSON parse failures, the application may crash or silently fail. Consider wrapping fetch calls in try/catch and verifying response status codes to handle errors gracefully.
- state.setTotalRows(response.count);
+ try {
+ if (!res.ok) {
+ throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${res.status}`);
+ }
+ state.setTotalRows(response.count);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to load table data:', error);
+ throw error;
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| handler.onChange((state: State) => loadTableData(state, URLModel, `/${URLModel}`)); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential fetch or state update failures in onChange callback.
Using handler.onChange((state) => loadTableData(state, URLModel, …)) is convenient, but might conceal fetch errors. Consider wrapping the callback in a try/catch or adding .catch(...) to prevent unhandled promise rejections.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (10)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.ts (1)
15-15:⚠️ Potential issueFix Response Structure to Match Expected Contract
Returning the complete API response instead of extracting
data.resultsmay break downstream components expecting only the results array.backend/core/migrations/0056_data_store_matrix_json_as_dict_not_str.py (1)
10-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance error handling in migration.
While the basic error handling is good, consider these improvements:
- Use proper logging instead of print statements
- Add more context about failures
- Handle potential data corruption scenarios
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts (3)
6-8: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd error handling for missing model info.
The endpoint construction assumes that
getModelInfowill always return valid data.Apply this diff to add error handling:
export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params }) => { const model = getModelInfo(params.model); + if (!model) { + error(400, `Invalid model: ${params.model}`); + } const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl ?? params.model}/${params.filter}/`;
16-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove type checking robustness.
The current type check using
Object.values()[0]is fragile as it assumes the response object has at least one value.Apply this diff to improve the type checking:
- const options = - typeof Object.values(optionsResponse)[0] === 'string' + const values = Object.values(optionsResponse); + const options = + values.length > 0 && typeof values[0] === 'string' ? Object.keys(optionsResponse) .map((key) => ({ label: optionsResponse[key], value: key })) .sort((a, b) => a.label.localeCompare(b.label)) - : optionsResponse; + : values.length === 0 ? [] : optionsResponse;
1-31:⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation for route parameters.
The current implementation might be vulnerable to path traversal attacks and potential XSS through unvalidated URL parameters.
Apply this diff to add parameter validation:
export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params, url }) => { + // Validate model and filter parameters + if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(params.model) || !/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(params.filter)) { + error(400, 'Invalid model or filter parameter'); + } + const model = getModelInfo(params.model); if (!model) { error(400, `Invalid model: ${params.model}`); } const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl ?? params.model}/${params.filter}/`;frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte (1)
17-22:⚠️ Potential issueFix potential memory leak in debouncing implementation.
The current debouncing implementation may lead to memory leaks as timeouts are created but not properly cleared on subsequent input events.
- on:input={() => { - const debounceTimeout = setTimeout(() => { - handler.filter(value, filterBy); - }, 300); - return () => clearTimeout(debounceTimeout); - }} + let debounceTimeout: NodeJS.Timeout; + on:input={() => { + clearTimeout(debounceTimeout); + debounceTimeout = setTimeout(() => { + handler.filter(value, filterBy); + }, 300); + }}frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts (2)
7-30:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling and improve type safety.
The
loadTableDatafunction needs error handling and better type definitions.+interface TableItem { + [key: string]: string | number | boolean; + meta?: Record<string, unknown>; +} export const loadTableData = async (state: State, URLModel: urlModel, endpoint: string) => { + try { + const res = await fetch(`${endpoint}?${getParams(state)}`); + if (!res.ok) { + throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${res.status}`); + } + const response = await res.json(); + if (!response?.results) { + throw new Error('Invalid response format'); + } state.setTotalRows(response.count); const bodyData = tableSourceMapper(response.results, listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body); const headData: Record<string, string> = listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body.reduce( (obj, key, index) => { obj[key] = listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].head[index]; return obj; }, {} ); const table: TableSource = { head: headData, body: bodyData, meta: response }; - return table.body.map((item: Record<string, any>, index: number) => { + return table.body.map((item: TableItem, index: number) => { return { ...item, meta: table?.meta?.results ? { ...table.meta.results[index] } : undefined }; }); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error loading table data:', error); + throw error; + } };
46-51:⚠️ Potential issueSanitize parameter values.
Filter values are directly appended to URL parameters without sanitization, which could lead to XSS attacks.
+const sanitizeValue = (value: unknown): string => { + const sanitized = encodeURIComponent(String(value)); + return sanitized.replace(/[!'()*]/g, c => '%' + c.charCodeAt(0).toString(16)); +}; + if (Array.isArray(filter.value)) { for (const val of filter.value) { - params.append(filterKey, val.toString()); + params.append(filterKey, sanitizeValue(val)); } } else if (filter.value) { - params.append(filterKey, filter.value.toString()); + params.append(filterKey, sanitizeValue(filter.value)); }frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (2)
107-126:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for DataHandler initialization.
The DataHandler initialization and onChange callback lack error handling.
-const handler = new DataHandler([], { - rowsPerPage: pagination ? numberRowsPerPage : undefined -}); -const rows = handler.getRows(); - -handler.onChange((state: State) => loadTableData(state, URLModel, `/${URLModel}`)); +try { + const handler = new DataHandler([], { + rowsPerPage: pagination ? numberRowsPerPage : undefined + }); + const rows = handler.getRows(); + + handler.onChange((state: State) => { + try { + return loadTableData(state, URLModel, `/${URLModel}`); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to load table data:', error); + // Consider showing user-friendly error message + } + }); +} catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to initialize DataHandler:', error); + // Consider showing user-friendly error message +}
174-174:⚠️ Potential issueCheck for undefined filter configs.
Object.entries(filters).some(([_, filter]) => !filter.hide)could crash if any filter isundefined.-$: hideFilters = hideFilters || !Object.entries(filters).some(([_, filter]) => !filter.hide); +$: hideFilters = hideFilters || !Object.entries(filters).some(([_, filter]) => filter && !filter.hide);
🧹 Nitpick comments (17)
frontend/src/params/filters.ts (1)
4-16: Add input validation and documentation for the parameter matcher.The implementation is clean but could benefit from:
- Input validation for the param
- JSDoc documentation explaining the purpose and usage
Consider adding validation and documentation:
+/** + * Matches URL parameters against defined filter keys in listViewFields. + * Normalizes parameters by converting to lowercase and replacing hyphens with underscores. + * @param param - The URL parameter to match + * @returns boolean indicating if the parameter matches any filter key + */ export const match = ((param) => { + if (typeof param !== 'string') { + return false; + } const filterKeys = new Set<string>(); Object.values(listViewFields).forEach((field) => {frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (1)
33-43: Ellipsed pagination
Usingnullto display an ellipsis is a convenient approach. Consider ignoring clicks on ellipses or providing visual feedback that they are inactive.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte (1)
21-25: Enhance accessibility
Include anaria-labelor equivalent attribute for this<select>element so screen readers convey the dropdown’s purpose.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (1)
137-140: RevisitpreventDeletelogic for clarity and maintainability.The condition for preventing deletion has multiple checks with cross-model logic. Consider extracting into a well-documented helper function.
-const preventDelete = (row: TableSource) => - (row.meta.builtin && actionsURLModel !== 'loaded-libraries') || - (!URLModel?.includes('libraries') && Object.hasOwn(row.meta, 'urn') && row.meta.urn) || - (Object.hasOwn(row.meta, 'reference_count') && row.meta.reference_count > 0); +function shouldPreventDelete(row: TableSource): boolean { + if (row.meta.builtin && actionsURLModel !== 'loaded-libraries') return true; + if (!URLModel?.includes('libraries') && row.meta.urn) return true; + return row.meta.reference_count > 0; +}backend/ebios_rm/views.py (4)
97-104: Add unit tests for the newly added filtering fields.You've expanded
filterset_fieldsforFearedEventViewSetto include"assets","gravity", and"qualifications". This is great for improved filtering capability. However, it's advisable to add or update unit tests ensuring each new field is effectively filtered (e.g., verifying that the correct subset of records is returned).
167-170: Expose dedicated documentation for the newpertinenceaction.The
pertinenceaction is a useful addition. Consider documenting or annotating it (for example, using docstrings or an OpenAPI schema) so consumers clearly understand what choices are returned and how they relate to the rest of theRoToViewSet.
175-175: Consider adding a default ordering or sorting forStakeholderViewSetresults.When you add more filterable fields like
"category", your stakeholders could appear in varying relative orders. To provide consistent user experience, you might define an ordering (for example, bynameorid).
203-210: Review concurrency and data integrity forAttackPathFilter.You’ve introduced new fields (
"used", "strategic_scenario", "stakeholders") for filtering. If multiple processes or services simultaneously modifyAttackPathrecords, ensure transaction boundaries and concurrency controls prevent partial or inconsistent data.frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (4)
1-3: Remove unused imports or confirm they are needed.
AutocompleteSelectandOptionappear to be used below, which is appropriate. If you notice any other imports in this file that are never referenced elsewhere, consider removing them to reduce clutter.
7-7: Document the newpropsshape inListViewFilterConfig.Adding
props?: { label: string; optionsEndpoint?: string; multiple?: boolean; options?: Option[] }provides flexible filtering capabilities. Consider including in-file documentation or type comments explaining each property’s purpose (e.g., clarifyingoptionsEndpointusage).
23-27: Ensure theYES_NO_OPTIONSarray is localized if needed.Currently,
'yes'and'no'are plain strings. If your platform supports multiple locales, consider adding i18n so labels reflect the user's preferred language.
401-827: Evaluate potential performance impact of largelistViewFields.The
listViewFieldsobject is quite extensive. If you frequently build or manipulate it at runtime, consider lazy loading or modularizing so that each feature’s fields are declared near its domain. This can improve maintainability by separating domain-specific filters.backend/library/views.py (5)
1-5: Address unused imports identified by static analysis.
viewsetsandstatusfromrest_frameworkappear unused.update_translations_in_objectfrom.helpersis also earmarked as unused.Dropping these imports will keep the file concise and free from dead code.
- from rest_framework import viewsets, status - from .helpers import update_translations_in_object🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
5-5:
rest_framework.viewsetsimported but unusedRemove unused import
(F401)
5-5:
rest_framework.statusimported but unusedRemove unused import
(F401)
43-67: Extend test coverage forStoredLibraryFilterSet.The new
object_typefiltering logic merges query sets (union_qs) to match specified fields. Make sure your test suite covers edge cases, such as empty values inobject_typeand libraries that have partialcontent__{field}definitions.
222-237: Consolidate repetitive code in new provider, locale, and object_type actions.These three actions are very similar in structure (fetching all objects, building a set, then returning a mapped response). Consider a single helper that accepts a field name or function so you can avoid repeating the loop and conversion logic.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
230-230: Ambiguous variable name:
l(E741)
232-232: Ambiguous variable name:
l(E741)
239-291: Validate concurrency inLoadedLibraryFilterSet.The subquery logic for
has_updateis quite powerful, but can become a bottleneck if frequently invoked in parallel. Consider transaction-level constraints or caching strategies for large data sets.
399-404: Clarify usage ofavailable_updatesAPI.The new endpoint returns all updatable libraries. Document the expected consumer behavior. For instance, do you expect UI to prompt users for the update action, or is this an automated background process?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (33)
backend/core/filters.py(0 hunks)backend/core/migrations/0055_alter_storedlibrary_content.py(1 hunks)backend/core/migrations/0056_data_store_matrix_json_as_dict_not_str.py(1 hunks)backend/core/models.py(3 hunks)backend/core/views.py(11 hunks)backend/ebios_rm/views.py(5 hunks)backend/library/utils.py(1 hunks)backend/library/views.py(6 hunks)frontend/messages/en.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/DetailView/DetailView.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte(3 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Form.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte(10 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte(2 hunks)frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts(15 hunks)frontend/src/lib/utils/types.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/params/filters.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte(3 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+page.svelte(1 hunks)frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+server.ts(1 hunks)frontend/tests/functional/detailed/libraries.test.ts(1 hunks)frontend/tests/functional/user-route.test.ts(2 hunks)frontend/tests/utils/page-content.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- backend/core/filters.py
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- backend/core/migrations/0055_alter_storedlibrary_content.py
- frontend/messages/en.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- frontend/src/lib/utils/types.ts
- frontend/src/lib/components/DetailView/DetailView.svelte
- frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/AutocompleteSelect.svelte
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/core/views.py
11-11: django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory imported but unused
Remove unused import: django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory
(F401)
295-295: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
299-299: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
308-308: Perimeter may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
654-654: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
655-655: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
659-659: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
674-674: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
675-675: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
678-678: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
684-684: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
685-685: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
689-689: RiskMatrix may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
1202-1202: UserReadSerializer may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
1911-1911: RiskAcceptance may be undefined, or defined from star imports
(F405)
backend/library/views.py
5-5: rest_framework.viewsets imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
5-5: rest_framework.status imported but unused
Remove unused import
(F401)
25-25: .helpers.update_translations_in_object imported but unused
Remove unused import: .helpers.update_translations_in_object
(F401)
230-230: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
232-232: Ambiguous variable name: l
(E741)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-functional-test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-startup-docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: test (3.12)
- GitHub Check: enterprise-functional-tests (3.12, chromium)
- GitHub Check: build (3.12)
🔇 Additional comments (46)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts (2)
1-5: LGTM! Consider adding imports for enhanced functionality.The imports are correctly structured. However, you'll need additional imports when implementing the suggested improvements for error handling, type safety, and rate limiting.
6-24: Previous review comments are still applicable.The implementation needs several critical improvements that were identified in previous reviews:
- Error handling and request validation
- Type safety and pagination handling
- Rate limiting protection
Please refer to the following past review comments that are still valid and should be implemented:
- "Enhance error handling and add request validation"
- "Add type safety and pagination handling"
- "Rate Limiting is Required for This Public API Endpoint"
frontend/tests/functional/detailed/libraries.test.ts (1)
17-17: Good performance optimization!Limiting the test to a maximum of 12 libraries is a sensible approach that:
- Reduces test execution time while maintaining adequate coverage
- Prevents potential timeouts in CI/CD pipelines
- Aligns with pagination-focused changes
frontend/src/lib/components/Forms/Form.svelte (1)
69-69: Good defensive programming!Adding optional chaining (
?.) provides better null safety when accessingdata.data, preventing potential runtime errors if the data is not immediately available during pagination.frontend/src/routes/(app)/(third-party)/[model=thirdparty_urlmodels]/+page.svelte (1)
59-59: LGTM! Consistent query parameter naming.The changes standardize the query parameter naming convention from camelCase to snake_case (
objectType→object_type), which aligns with REST API best practices.Also applies to: 67-67, 75-75
frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts (1)
14-14: LGTM! Clean URL construction, but error handling needed.The use of the nullish coalescing operator (
??) improves code readability. However, the fetch request still lacks proper error handling.frontend/tests/functional/user-route.test.ts (2)
15-31: LGTM! Improved test robustness by handling modal dialogs.The changes enhance test reliability by systematically handling modal dialogs that could interfere with test execution:
- Wait for network idle state
- Check and dismiss modal backdrop
- Check and close dummy element
- Press escape to close any remaining modals
199-199: LGTM! Standardized query parameter naming.The change from
objectTypetoobject_typealigns with the naming convention used across the codebase.frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/+page.svelte (1)
150-151: LGTM! Standardized query parameter naming.The changes consistently update the query parameter from
objectTypetoobject_typeacross all URLs, aligning with the naming convention used throughout the codebase.Also applies to: 159-160, 168-169
backend/library/utils.py (1)
541-541:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify that library content is already parsed.
The removal of
json.loadssuggests thatself._library.contentis already parsed and available in the correct format. Please ensure that this assumption holds true across all code paths.Run the following script to verify the content format:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check how library content is handled across the codebase. # Search for library content handling rg "content.*=.*json\.loads" -A 3 -B 3 # Search for library content assignments rg "content.*=(?!.*json\.loads)" -A 3 -B 3 # Search for library content type hints ast-grep --pattern 'content: $_'Length of output: 1462
Action: Double-check library content parsing consistency
It appears that while the code in
backend/library/utils.pynow directly assignslibrary_objects = self._library.contentit remains unclear whether
self._library.contentis guaranteed to be already parsed. In other parts of the codebase—such as withinbackend/app_tests/api/test_utils.pyandbackend/core/models.py—the library content is explicitly processed withjson.loads. Please ensure that all code paths provide library content in the expected (parsed) format or update the affected code paths accordingly.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (2)
2-2: LGTM! Updated import for remote data handling.The import path change to
@vincjo/datatables/remotealigns with the shift to remote data handling across the ModelTable components.
7-15: LGTM! Added debouncing for search input.The changes improve search performance by implementing debouncing:
- Immediate search feedback
- Delayed invalidation after 400ms of inactivity
- Proper cleanup of existing timeouts
Also applies to: 24-24
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowCount.svelte (1)
8-18: LGTM! Improved error handling for undefined states.The component now properly handles cases where
rowCountis undefined by rendering an empty div, preventing potential runtime errors.backend/core/models.py (3)
310-310: LGTM! Simplified library objects assignment.Direct assignment of
library_data["objects"]tolibrary_objectsimproves code readability.
737-746: LGTM! Well-optimized version check implementation.The
has_updateproperty efficiently checks for updates usingvalues_listandorder_byto get the maximum version.
747-760: LGTM! Efficient implementation of updatable libraries query.The
updatable_librariesclass method uses a well-structured subquery withOuterRefandFfor comparing versions.frontend/src/lib/utils/crud.ts (2)
780-783: Verify references to 'stored-libraries' across the codebase
Replacing'libraries'with'stored-libraries'looks correct at first glance. However, ensure that any residual references to'libraries'in other files (e.g., navigation menus, older routes, etc.) are updated or intentionally preserved.
784-787: Consistent approach for 'loaded-libraries'
Defining'loaded-libraries'similarly to'stored-libraries'helps keep the code uniform and clear.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (7)
2-2: Confirm correct import path
If you plan to migrate to version 2 of this library, useimport { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/server';. Otherwise, confirm that the@vincjo/datatables/remoteimport aligns with the legacy version.
5-5: Good usage of afterNavigate
InvokingafterNavigateis a clean way to hook into route changes for pagination resets or other post-navigation logic.
12-15: Centralize page updates
Declaring a dedicatedsetPagefunction is a neat way to unify and manage page changes and invalidation logic in one place.
17-21: Validate forced page reset
Callinghandler.setPage(1)after every navigation may reset users to the first page unexpectedly. Confirm this behavior is desired before finalizing.
25-25: Consistent usage of setPage
Switching the button's click handler tosetPage('previous')maintains consistency with your new helper function.
28-31: Fallback logic for undefined pages
When$pagesisundefined, you display a single button for the current page. Confirm that this scenario accurately reflects your intended UX.
47-47: Consistent navigation for 'next'
UsingsetPage('next')aligns the next-button logic with the rest of your pagination updates.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/RowsPerPage.svelte (3)
2-2: Confirm correct import path
If you intend to use the newer v2 library, consider importingTableHandlerfrom'@vincjo/datatables/server'.
9-12: Resetting to page 1
Automatically returning to the first page when rows per page changes is an intuitive user experience.
14-14: Check division by zero edge cases
Be sure$rowCount?.totalcannot be zero or undefined. That would cause unexpected results in theMath.ceillogic.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Th.svelte (2)
2-2: Update import path for compatibility with Svelte 4.The current import path needs to be updated to match the correct version for Svelte 4 with Legacy v1.x.
-import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; +import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote';
9-13: LGTM! Improved sorting logic and accessibility.The refactored sorting logic with the new
updatefunction andaria-sortattribute improves code organization and accessibility.Also applies to: 17-26
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte (1)
2-2: Update import path for compatibility with Svelte 4.The current import path needs to be updated to match the correct version for Svelte 4 with Legacy v1.x.
-import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; +import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote';frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts (1)
34-35: Fix incorrect nullish coalescing operator usage.The nullish coalescing operator is unnecessary here as
toString()will never return null/undefined.- params.set('offset', offset.toString() ?? '0'); - params.set('limit', rowsPerPage.toString() ?? '10'); + params.set('offset', offset.toString()); + params.set('limit', rowsPerPage.toString());backend/ebios_rm/views.py (2)
135-143: Validate expandedfieldsinRoToFilter.You've added fields like
"risk_origin","motivation", and"feared_events". Ensure that each new field is validated in your query logic, especially when referencing related tables or enumerations. Without thorough validation, you may face unexpected filter behavior or runtime errors.
222-222: Promote index usage for the newly addedlikelihoodfilter inOperationalScenarioViewSet.Filtering on
likelihoodmay be part of performance-critical queries. Revisit whether thelikelihoodfield in the underlying model needs an index, especially if you expect large volumes of data.frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (3)
18-18: Confirm type safety for'filters?: {[key: string]: ListViewFilterConfig | undefined;}'.Allowing
undefinedis helpful when filters are optional, but ensure your rendering logic correctly distinguishes between defined and undefined filters to avoid unexpected behavior (like rendering empty UI elements).
818-825: Confirm the purpose ofundefinedfilters inextra.
829-834: Verify usage of the newFilterKeysmapping.The mapped type
FilterKeyshelps identify defined filters for each entity. Double-check that all references toFilterKeys(in the rest of the codebase) work as intended, and that you handle edge cases (e.g., collections without filters).backend/library/views.py (2)
19-19: Double-check module-level imports ofdjango_filters.
django_filtersis used for defining filter sets. Confirm you have thedjango-filterslibrary installed and properly configured insettings.pyto avoid runtime errors.
293-399: Strengthen permission checks forLoadedLibraryViewSetactions.You've introduced filtering and load updates. Ensure that each new method (and old ones) has consistent permission checks so only authorized users can view or modify data.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
316-316: Do not use bare
except(E722)
333-333: Do not use bare
except(E722)
350-350: Do not use bare
except(E722)
361-361: Do not use bare
except(E722)
backend/core/views.py (7)
130-144: Consider restricting filter fields for security and performance.The
GenericFilterSetclass allows filtering on all model fields by default (fields = "__all__"). This could potentially expose sensitive data or impact performance.
153-153: Consider restricting orderable fields.Setting
ordering_fields = "__all__"allows ordering by any model field, which could expose sensitive data or impact performance.
290-301: Action Required: Ensure Explicit Import of Perimeter in ViewsThe PerimeterFilter implementation looks good, but please verify that you're importing the Perimeter model explicitly (e.g.,
from core.models import Perimeter) instead of relying on star imports.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
295-295:
Perimetermay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
299-299:
Perimetermay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
652-700: Attention: Ensure Explicit Import of RiskMatrix in backend/core/views.pyThe new risk level, impact, and probability actions are implemented well; however, it appears that in backend/core/views.py the
RiskMatrixmodel might be coming in via a star-import.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
654-654:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
655-655:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
659-659:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
674-674:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
675-675:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
678-678:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
684-684:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
685-685:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
689-689:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
748-756: LGTM! Enhanced filtering capabilities.The addition of
filtering_labelsto filterset_fields improves the filtering capabilities of the VulnerabilityViewSet.
1199-1205: Action Required: Replace wildcard import with an explicit UserReadSerializer import.The current implementation in
backend/core/views.pyuses a wildcard import (from .serializers import *), which makes it unclear whereUserReadSerializeris coming from.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
1202-1202:
UserReadSerializermay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
3925-3925: LGTM! Improved search functionality.The update to search_fields to use
requirement__nameandrequirement__descriptionimproves the search functionality by properly searching through related fields.
| const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl}${ | ||
| url.searchParams ? '?' + url.searchParams.toString() : '' | ||
| }`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add pagination parameters validation.
Since this PR is about paginating API calls, ensure that pagination parameters are properly validated.
const model = getModelInfo('ebios-rm');
+const limit = Number(url.searchParams.get('limit')) || 10;
+const offset = Number(url.searchParams.get('offset')) || 0;
+
+if (isNaN(limit) || limit < 1 || limit > 100) {
+ throw error(400, 'Invalid limit parameter');
+}
+if (isNaN(offset) || offset < 0) {
+ throw error(400, 'Invalid offset parameter');
+}
+
const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl}${
url.searchParams ? '?' + url.searchParams.toString() : ''
}`;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl}${ | |
| url.searchParams ? '?' + url.searchParams.toString() : '' | |
| }`; | |
| const model = getModelInfo('ebios-rm'); | |
| const limit = Number(url.searchParams.get('limit')) || 10; | |
| const offset = Number(url.searchParams.get('offset')) || 0; | |
| if (isNaN(limit) || limit < 1 || limit > 100) { | |
| throw error(400, 'Invalid limit parameter'); | |
| } | |
| if (isNaN(offset) || offset < 0) { | |
| throw error(400, 'Invalid offset parameter'); | |
| } | |
| const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl}${ | |
| url.searchParams ? '?' + url.searchParams.toString() : '' | |
| }`; |
| @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ export class PageContent extends BasePage { | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
| // If the library is not visible, it might have already been loaded | |||
| await this.page.waitForTimeout(3000); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a dynamic wait instead of a fixed timeout.
The 3-second fixed timeout could:
- Make tests unnecessarily slow when the button appears faster
- Still be insufficient if the button takes longer to appear
Replace the fixed timeout with a dynamic wait:
-await this.page.waitForTimeout(3000);
+await this.page.waitForSelector('[data-testid="tablerow-import-button"]', {
+ state: 'visible',
+ timeout: 5000
+});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| await this.page.waitForTimeout(3000); | |
| await this.page.waitForSelector('[data-testid="tablerow-import-button"]', { | |
| state: 'visible', | |
| timeout: 5000 | |
| }); |
| @@ -1,14 +1,18 @@ | |||
| <script lang="ts"> | |||
| import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables'; | |||
| import type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify the package version and remote module.
The import statement has been updated to use the remote module. Let's ensure we're using a valid and up-to-date version of the package.
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest version of @vincjo/datatables and does it support the /remote module?
💡 Result:
The latest version of @vincjo/datatables is 2.5.0, released 16 days ago[6][8].
For /remote module support:
- Version 2.x replaces
/remotewith a dedicated/servermodule for server-side operations[2]. - Legacy v1.x remote functionality remains accessible via:
import { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote' // v1-style[1][2]
- The modern v2 equivalent uses:
import { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/server' // v2-style[2]
Key changes include replacing DataHandler with TableHandler and shifting from stores/getters to direct property access[1][2]. Server-side configurations now use table.load() instead of event listeners[2].
Citations:
- 1: https://vincjo.fr/datatables/docs/client/getting-started/migration
- 2: https://vincjo.fr/datatables/docs/server/getting-started/migration
- 3: https://datatables.net/download/compatibility
- 4: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@vincjo%2Fdatatables
- 5: https://github.com/vincjo/datatables
- 6: https://github.com/vincjo/datatables/blob/main/package.json
- 7: https://datatables.net/forums/discussion/32542/datatables-and-webpack
- 8: https://www.npmjs.com/~vincjo
- 9: https://datatables.net/forums/discussion/69066/esm-es6-module-support
- 10: https://codesandbox.io/examples/package/@vincjo/datatables
Update the import to match the latest @vincjo/datatables changes.
Our web query confirms that @vincjo/datatables is now at version 2.5.0. Version 2 replaces the /remote module with a dedicated /server module—meaning the current import of DataHandler from @vincjo/datatables/remote is no longer supported. Depending on your needs, please update as follows:
- For server-side functionality in v2:
import { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/server';
- If you require legacy v1 behavior:
import { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/legacy/remote';
Please adjust the import accordingly based on whether you wish to adopt the new v2 approach or continue with legacy behavior.
| optionsLabelField: 'label', | ||
| optionsValueField: 'value', | ||
| multiple: true | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const THREAT_FILTER: ListViewFilterConfig = { | ||
| component: SelectFilter, | ||
| getColumn: (row) => (row.threats?.length ? row.threats.map((t) => t.str) : null), | ||
| extraProps: { | ||
| defaultOptionName: 'threat' | ||
| component: AutocompleteSelect, | ||
| props: { | ||
| optionsEndpoint: 'threats', | ||
| label: 'threat', | ||
| multiple: true | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const ASSET_FILTER: ListViewFilterConfig = { | ||
| component: SelectFilter, | ||
| getColumn: (row) => (row.assets?.length ? row.assets.map((t) => t.str) : null), | ||
| extraProps: { | ||
| defaultOptionName: 'asset' | ||
| }, | ||
| alwaysDisplay: true | ||
| component: AutocompleteSelect, | ||
| props: { | ||
| optionsEndpoint: 'assets', | ||
| label: 'asset', | ||
| multiple: true | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const QUALIFICATION_FILTER: ListViewFilterConfig = { | ||
| component: SelectFilter, | ||
| getColumn: (row) => (row.qualifications?.length ? row.qualifications.map((t) => t.str) : null), | ||
| extraProps: { | ||
| defaultOptionName: 'qualification' | ||
| }, | ||
| alwaysDisplay: true | ||
| component: AutocompleteSelect, | ||
| props: { | ||
| label: 'qualification', | ||
| optionsEndpoint: 'qualifications', | ||
| multiple: true | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const GRAVITY_FILTER: ListViewFilterConfig = { | ||
| component: SelectFilter, | ||
| getColumn: (row) => row.gravity.name, | ||
| extraProps: { | ||
| defaultOptionName: 'gravity' | ||
| }, | ||
| alwaysDisplay: true | ||
| const RISK_IMPACT_FILTER: ListViewFilterConfig = { | ||
| component: AutocompleteSelect, | ||
| props: { | ||
| label: 'gravity', | ||
| optionsEndpoint: 'risk-matrices/impact', | ||
| optionsLabelField: 'label', | ||
| optionsValueField: 'value', | ||
| multiple: true | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const LIKELIHOOD_FILTER: ListViewFilterConfig = { | ||
| component: SelectFilter, | ||
| getColumn: (row) => row.likelihood.name, | ||
| extraProps: { | ||
| defaultOptionName: 'likelihood' | ||
| }, | ||
| alwaysDisplay: true | ||
| const RISK_PROBABILITY_FILTER: ListViewFilterConfig = { | ||
| component: AutocompleteSelect, | ||
| props: { | ||
| label: 'likelihood', | ||
| optionsEndpoint: 'risk-matrices/probability', | ||
| optionsLabelField: 'label', | ||
| optionsValueField: 'value', | ||
| multiple: true | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const IS_SELECTED_FILTER: ListViewFilterConfig = { | ||
| component: SelectFilter, | ||
| getColumn: (row) => (row.is_selected ? 'true' : 'false'), | ||
| extraProps: { | ||
| defaultOptionName: 'is_selected' | ||
| }, | ||
| alwaysDisplay: true | ||
| component: AutocompleteSelect, | ||
| props: { | ||
| label: 'is_selected', | ||
| options: YES_NO_OPTIONS, | ||
| multiple: true | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Centralize repeated AutocompleteSelect filter patterns.
You’ve defined numerous filters with similar AutocompleteSelect definitions (like props.multiple = true and common endpoint usage). Extract a helper factory or utility function to avoid duplicated code and reduce the risk of inconsistencies.
nas-tabchiche
force-pushed
the
CA-582-handle-backend-pagination
branch
from
e6caf8e to
2cf7729
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments. If you are seeing this consistently, please check "Code review limits" under "Moderation" settings.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
frontend/src/lib/utils/load.ts (1)
44-46: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImplement consistent error handling across all fetch requests.
The error handling is inconsistent across different fetch requests in the file. Some requests have basic error handling (select fields), while others have none (related models and object data).
Apply consistent error handling to all fetch requests:
- const res = await event.fetch(relEndpoint); - const revData = await res.json().then((res) => res.results); + try { + const res = await event.fetch(relEndpoint); + if (!res.ok) { + throw new Error(`Failed to fetch related data: ${res.statusText}`); + } + const revData = await res.json().then((res) => res.results); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error fetching related data:', error); + throw error; + } // ... and similarly for object data fetch: - const objectResponse = await event.fetch(objectEndpoint); - const objectData = await objectResponse.json(); + try { + const objectResponse = await event.fetch(objectEndpoint); + if (!objectResponse.ok) { + throw new Error(`Failed to fetch object data: ${objectResponse.statusText}`); + } + const objectData = await objectResponse.json(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error fetching object data:', error); + throw error; + }Also, enhance the error handling for select fields to propagate errors instead of just logging them:
- } else { - console.error( - `Failed to fetch data for ${selectField.field}: ${response.statusText}` - ); + } else { + throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data for ${selectField.field}: ${response.statusText}`); } + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error fetching select field data:', error); + throw error; + }Also applies to: 87-89, 103-115
♻️ Duplicate comments (12)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/ebios-rm/+server.ts (4)
6-10:⚠️ Potential issueValidate and sanitize URL parameters before forwarding.
The current implementation directly forwards URL parameters, which could potentially expose sensitive information.
As suggested in the previous review, apply this diff to enhance parameter validation:
export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params, url }) => { + const validParams = ['limit', 'offset', 'search']; // Add your valid params + const sanitizedParams = new URLSearchParams(); + + for (const [key, value] of url.searchParams) { + if (validParams.includes(key)) { + sanitizedParams.append(key, value); + } + } + const model = getModelInfo('ebios-rm'); const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl}${ - url.searchParams ? '?' + url.searchParams.toString() : '' + sanitizedParams.toString() ? '?' + sanitizedParams.toString() : '' }`;
8-10:⚠️ Potential issueValidate pagination parameters.
Since this PR is about paginating API calls, ensure that pagination parameters are properly validated.
As suggested in the previous review, apply this diff to validate pagination parameters:
const model = getModelInfo('ebios-rm'); +const limit = Number(url.searchParams.get('limit')) || 10; +const offset = Number(url.searchParams.get('offset')) || 0; + +if (isNaN(limit) || limit < 1 || limit > 100) { + throw error(400, 'Invalid limit parameter'); +} +if (isNaN(offset) || offset < 0) { + throw error(400, 'Invalid offset parameter'); +} + const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl}${
12-17:⚠️ Potential issueEnhance error handling and add type safety.
The current implementation directly exposes backend errors and lacks type safety for the response data.
As suggested in the previous review, apply this diff to improve error handling and type safety:
+interface EbiosRMResponse { + count: number; + next: string | null; + previous: string | null; + results: Array<unknown>; // Replace with your specific type +} - const res = await fetch(endpoint); + try { + const res = await fetch(endpoint); + + if (!res.ok) { + const errorData = await res.json(); + throw error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, { + message: 'Failed to fetch data', + details: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' ? errorData : undefined + }); + } - const data = await res.json(); + const data = await res.json() as EbiosRMResponse; + } catch (e) { + throw error(500, 'Internal server error'); + }
6-24:⚠️ Potential issueAdd rate limiting to prevent API abuse.
The endpoint lacks rate limiting protection, making it vulnerable to abuse.
As suggested in the previous review, implement rate limiting using the existing solution in the codebase:
+import { rateLimit } from '$lib/utils/rate-limit'; + export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params, url }) => { + const clientIp = url.searchParams.get('clientIp') || 'unknown'; + const rateLimitResult = await rateLimit(clientIp, { + points: 100, // Number of requests + duration: 60, // Per minute + }); + + if (!rateLimitResult.success) { + throw error(429, 'Too Many Requests'); + }frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts (2)
6-8:⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation for route parameters.
The current implementation might be vulnerable to path traversal attacks through unvalidated URL parameters.
export const GET: RequestHandler = async ({ fetch, params }) => { + // Validate route parameters + if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(params.model) || !/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(params.filter)) { + error(400, 'Invalid route parameters'); + } + const model = getModelInfo(params.model); const endpoint = `${BASE_API_URL}/${model.endpointUrl ?? params.model}/${params.filter}/`;
14-24:⚠️ Potential issueAdd type safety and validation for response transformation.
The current implementation assumes the response structure without proper validation.
+ // Validate response structure + if (!optionsResponse || typeof optionsResponse !== 'object') { + error(500, 'Invalid response format'); + } + + const values = Object.values(optionsResponse); const options = - typeof Object.values(optionsResponse)[0] === 'string' + values.length > 0 && typeof values[0] === 'string' ? Object.keys(optionsResponse) .map((key) => ({ - label: optionsResponse[key], + label: String(optionsResponse[key] ?? ''), value: key })) .sort((a, b) => a.label.localeCompare(b.label)) - : optionsResponse; + : values.length === 0 ? [] : optionsResponse;backend/core/migrations/0056_data_store_matrix_json_as_dict_not_str.py (1)
10-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance error handling and data validation in migration.
The current error handling could be improved to:
- Use proper logging instead of print statements
- Add data validation before conversion
- Handle transaction rollback on failure
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
- try: - matrix.json_definition = json.loads(matrix.json_definition) - matrix.save() - except Exception as e: - if type(matrix.json_definition) is dict: - continue - print(f"Error converting matrix {matrix.id} to dict: {e}") + try: + if not isinstance(matrix.json_definition, dict): + if not isinstance(matrix.json_definition, str): + logger.error( + "Invalid json_definition type", + extra={ + "matrix_id": matrix.id, + "type": type(matrix.json_definition) + } + ) + continue + try: + matrix.json_definition = json.loads(matrix.json_definition) + matrix.save() + except json.JSONDecodeError as e: + logger.error( + "Failed to decode json_definition", + extra={ + "matrix_id": matrix.id, + "error": str(e), + "current_value": matrix.json_definition + } + ) + continue + except Exception as e: + logger.error( + "Unexpected error while converting matrix", + extra={ + "matrix_id": matrix.id, + "error": str(e) + } + ) + raisefrontend/tests/utils/page-content.ts (1)
86-86: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionReplace fixed timeout with dynamic wait.
Using a fixed timeout can make tests:
- Unnecessarily slow when the button appears faster
- Flaky if the button takes longer to appear
Replace the fixed timeout with a dynamic wait:
-await this.page.waitForTimeout(3000); +await this.page.waitForSelector('[data-testid="tablerow-import-button"]', { + state: 'visible', + timeout: 5000 +});frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Pagination.svelte (1)
24-50: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd ARIA labels to pagination buttons for better accessibility.
The pagination buttons need proper accessibility attributes.
-<button type="button" class:disabled={$pageNumber === 1} on:click={() => setPage('previous')}> +<button + type="button" + class:disabled={$pageNumber === 1} + on:click={() => setPage('previous')} + aria-label="Previous page" +> {m.previous()} </button> {#if $pages === undefined} - <button type="button" on:click={() => setPage($pageNumber)}> + <button + type="button" + on:click={() => setPage($pageNumber)} + aria-label="Current page {$pageNumber}" + > {$pageNumber} </button> {:else} {#each $pages as page} <button type="button" class:active={$pageNumber === page} class:ellipse={page === null} on:click={() => setPage(page)} + aria-label={page === null ? 'More pages' : `Go to page ${page}`} + aria-current={$pageNumber === page ? 'page' : undefined} > {page ?? '...'} </button> {/each} {/if} <button type="button" class:disabled={$pageNumber === $pageCount} on:click={() => setPage('next')} + aria-label="Next page" > {m.next()} </button>frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ThFilter.svelte (1)
17-22:⚠️ Potential issueFix potential memory leak in debouncing implementation.
The current debouncing implementation may lead to memory leaks as timeouts are created but not properly cleared on subsequent input events.
+let debounceTimeout: NodeJS.Timeout; on:input={() => { + clearTimeout(debounceTimeout); - const debounceTimeout = setTimeout(() => { + debounceTimeout = setTimeout(() => { handler.filter(value, filterBy); }, 300); - return () => clearTimeout(debounceTimeout); }}frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/handler.ts (2)
7-30:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling and improve type safety.
The
loadTableDatafunction needs error handling and better type definitions.+interface TableItem { + [key: string]: string | number | boolean; + meta?: Record<string, unknown>; +} export const loadTableData = async (state: State, URLModel: urlModel, endpoint: string) => { + try { + const res = await fetch(`${endpoint}?${getParams(state)}`); + if (!res.ok) { + throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${res.status}`); + } + const response = await res.json(); + if (!response?.results) { + throw new Error('Invalid response format'); + } state.setTotalRows(response.count); const bodyData = tableSourceMapper(response.results, listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body); const headData: Record<string, string> = listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].body.reduce( (obj, key, index) => { obj[key] = listViewFields[URLModel as urlModel].head[index]; return obj; }, {} ); const table: TableSource = { head: headData, body: bodyData, meta: response }; - return table.body.map((item: Record<string, any>, index: number) => { + return table.body.map((item: TableItem, index: number) => { return { ...item, meta: table?.meta?.results ? { ...table.meta.results[index] } : undefined }; }); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error loading table data:', error); + throw error; + } };
32-55:⚠️ Potential issueAdd parameter validation and sanitization.
The
getParamsfunction needs validation for numeric parameters and sanitization for filter values.+const isPositiveNumber = (value: number) => Number.isInteger(value) && value >= 0; + +const sanitizeValue = (value: unknown): string => { + const sanitized = encodeURIComponent(String(value)); + return sanitized.replace(/[!'()*]/g, c => '%' + c.charCodeAt(0).toString(16)); +}; const getParams = ({ offset, rowsPerPage, search, sort, filters }: State) => { const params = new URLSearchParams(); - params.set('offset', offset.toString() ?? '0'); - params.set('limit', rowsPerPage.toString() ?? '10'); + if (!isPositiveNumber(offset)) throw new Error('Invalid offset value'); + if (!isPositiveNumber(rowsPerPage)) throw new Error('Invalid rowsPerPage value'); + params.set('offset', offset.toString()); + params.set('limit', rowsPerPage.toString()); if (search) { - params.set('search', search); + params.set('search', sanitizeValue(search)); } if (sort) { + if (!['asc', 'desc'].includes(sort.direction)) { + throw new Error('Invalid sort direction'); + } params.set('ordering', `${sort.direction === 'desc' ? '-' : ''}${sort.orderBy}`); } if (filters) { for (const filter of filters) { const filterKey = filter.filterBy.toString(); if (Array.isArray(filter.value)) { for (const val of filter.value) { - params.append(filterKey, val.toString()); + params.append(filterKey, sanitizeValue(val)); } } else if (filter.value) { - params.append(filterKey, filter.value.toString()); + params.append(filterKey, sanitizeValue(filter.value)); } } } return params; };
🧹 Nitpick comments (32)
frontend/src/routes/(app)/(internal)/[model=urlmodel]/[filter=filters]/+server.ts (3)
1-5: Add TypeScript interfaces for API response types.Define interfaces for the expected response structure to improve type safety and code maintainability.
import { error, type NumericRange } from '@sveltejs/kit'; import type { RequestHandler } from './$types'; import { BASE_API_URL } from '$lib/utils/constants'; import { getModelInfo } from '$lib/utils/crud'; + +interface ApiResponse { + [key: string]: string | unknown; +} + +interface Option { + label: string; + value: string; +}
10-13: Enhance error handling with timeouts and specific error messages.Add request timeout and improve error messages for better debugging and user experience.
- const res = await fetch(endpoint); + const controller = new AbortController(); + const timeoutId = setTimeout(() => controller.abort(), 5000); + + try { + const res = await fetch(endpoint, { + signal: controller.signal + }); + clearTimeout(timeoutId); + + if (!res.ok) { + const errorData = await res.json(); + error( + res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, + { + message: 'Failed to fetch options', + status: res.status, + details: errorData + } + ); + } + } catch (e) { + if (e instanceof Error) { + error(500, { + message: e.name === 'AbortError' ? 'Request timeout' : 'Failed to fetch options', + details: e.message + }); + } + throw e; + } - if (!res.ok) { - error(res.status as NumericRange<400, 599>, await res.json()); - }
26-30: Add security headers to the response.Include security headers to enhance the API's security posture.
return new Response(JSON.stringify(options), { headers: { - 'Content-Type': 'application/json' + 'Content-Type': 'application/json', + 'X-Content-Type-Options': 'nosniff', + 'Cache-Control': 'no-store', + 'X-Frame-Options': 'DENY' } });backend/core/views.py (8)
11-11: Consider removing the unusedfilterset_factoryimport.Static analysis indicates that
filterset_factoryis not being used anywhere in this file. Removing any unused imports helps keep the codebase lean and more maintainable.- from django_filters.filterset import filterset_factory🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
11-11:
django_filters.filterset.filterset_factoryimported but unusedRemove unused import:
django_filters.filterset.filterset_factory(F401)
153-153: Exposing all fields for ordering might cause performance or security concerns.Using
ordering_fields = "__all__"allows sorting on every field, which can severely impact performance or reveal sensitive fields unintentionally. Evaluate if restricting to whitelisted fields is more appropriate.
156-156:model = Nonerelies on dynamic assignment.Confirm that all usage sites properly assign
modelbefore usage to prevent potential runtime errors if inadvertently called uninitialized.
160-169: Consider removing or clarifying the large commented-out code block.Leaving extensive commented code can cause confusion. If it’s no longer needed, remove it. Otherwise, add clarifying comments to explain its future usage.
652-671: Optimize the approach to building risk level choices.The code unions dictionaries for each
RiskMatrix. If the number of risk matrices grows, repeated queries in a loop may harm performance. Consider batching or caching to reduce overhead. Otherwise, the logic seems correct.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
654-654:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
655-655:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
659-659:
RiskMatrixmay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
1200-1205: Use.distinct()when fetching owners.When retrieving the owners from
User.objects.filter(applied_controls__isnull=False), consider adding.distinct()to avoid duplicate rows if a user owns multiple controls.- User.objects.filter(applied_controls__isnull=False), + User.objects.filter(applied_controls__isnull=False).distinct(),🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
1202-1202:
UserReadSerializermay be undefined, or defined from star imports(F405)
1915-1918: Boolean filter foris_applied_control_owneris good.Ensures we can query users who own or do not own applied controls. Just be mindful to call
.distinct()if the same user is tied to multiple references.
1930-1932:filter_applied_control_owneris concise but consider.distinct().Again, calling
.distinct()on the filtered queryset can prevent row duplication if needed.backend/library/views.py (5)
25-25: Remove or utilize the unusedupdate_translations_in_objectimport.Static analysis flags that
update_translations_in_objectis imported but never used. Removing unused imports keeps the file clean.- from .helpers import update_translations, update_translations_in_object + from .helpers import update_translations🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
25-25:
.helpers.update_translations_in_objectimported but unusedRemove unused import:
.helpers.update_translations_in_object(F401)
43-67:StoredLibraryFilterSetprovides robust filtering for stored libraries.The custom
filter_object_typemethod cleverly targets nested JSON fields. Be mindful of performance if content fields grow large. Also confirm the"icontains"or__isnullfilters match your data expectations.
173-173: Ensure caching if largecontentis retrieved frequently.Storing and retrieving
library_objectsmight be big. Consider caching or an efficient retrieval pattern if performance becomes an issue.
222-226: Provider choices endpoint looks good.Gathering distinct providers from the DB is straightforward. Confirm that adding
.distinct()is not needed to remove duplicates in large datasets.
228-233: Locale endpoint: consider renaming the variablel.Line 230-232 uses an ambiguous variable name
l. Renaming it to be clearer (e.g.,liborlibrary) improves readability.- for l in StoredLibrary.objects.all() + for lib in StoredLibrary.objects.all()🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
230-230: Ambiguous variable name:
l(E741)
232-232: Ambiguous variable name:
l(E741)
frontend/tests/functional/detailed/libraries.test.ts (1)
17-17: Document the reason for limiting library count.The optimization to limit library processing to 12 items is good for test performance. Consider adding a comment explaining why this specific limit was chosen.
- for (let i = 1; i < Math.min(12, libraries.length); i++) { + // Limit to 12 libraries to optimize test execution time while maintaining sufficient coverage + const MAX_LIBRARIES = 12; + for (let i = 1; i < Math.min(MAX_LIBRARIES, libraries.length); i++) {frontend/src/params/filters.ts (1)
4-16: LGTM! Efficient implementation of parameter matching.The use of Set for O(1) lookup and proper parameter normalization makes this a solid implementation.
Consider these improvements:
- Add JSDoc documentation explaining the purpose and usage.
- Add type safety for the
field.filtersobject:+interface FilterField { + filters?: Record<string, unknown>; +} + export const match = ((param) => { const filterKeys = new Set<string>(); - Object.values(listViewFields).forEach((field) => { + Object.values(listViewFields).forEach((field: FilterField) => { if ('filters' in field && field.filters) { Object.keys(field.filters).forEach((filterKey) => filterKeys.add(filterKey)); } });frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (6)
72-73: Allow toggling filter visibility.
export let hideFilters = false;offers improved user control for advanced filtering. Confirm that any styling or layout changes are tested for mobile or smaller screens.
123-125: Mark the reason behindinvalidateTableusage.
This boolean triggers table invalidation but might be unclear to future maintainers. Document or rename it for clarity, e.g.,forceRefreshTable.
126-126: Suggest try/catch within handler.onChange.
Right now, ifloadTableDatafails, exceptions might bubble up. Consider wrapping it in a try/catch or a promise chain with.catch()to handle potential fetch errors gracefully.
144-153: Use robust form schema.
A newsuperFormis created with an empty Zod schema. If advanced validation is expected, consider elaborating the schema to handle filter queries more reliably.
174-175: Simplify and clarify filter toggling.
UsinghideFilters = hideFilters || !Object.entries(filters).some(...)can be confusing. A more direct approach (e.g., separate local boolean) may improve readability.
208-208: Hide filter button for smaller device widths.
At line 208:header class="flex justify-between..."with the filter button can grow complicated on smaller screens. Check that Skeleton popup positioning is stable on mobile.frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (8)
7-7: Use consistent property naming inprops.
props?: { label: string; optionsEndpoint?: string; multiple?: boolean; options?: Option[] };is flexible. If you have other optional fields (likeoptionsValueField), consider adding them here for consistency.
23-27: Promote reusability ofYES_NO_OPTIONS.
You introduced a constant with yes/no options. If used across multiple filter definitions, consider an internal utility module for better DRY compliance.
100-109: Use consistent naming forAPPLIED_CONTROL_STATUS_FILTER.
When referencing a “status” filter, confirm that the domain or resource name is correct (applied-controls). This can reduce confusion if you have multiple status endpoints.
272-282: Replace TODO with actual tests forCURRENT_CRITICALITY_FILTER.
You have placeholders referencing[1, 2, 3, 4]. If more dynamic data is needed, fetch from an endpoint or confirm the enumeration is correct.
284-294: Replace or finalizeRESIDUAL_CRITICALITY_FILTERplaceholder.
Same approach as above (line 284). Validate that enumerated values are correct or come from a relevant endpoint.
676-682: Add unit tests for newstored-librariescolumns & filters.
You added'provider', 'ref_id', 'name', 'description', 'locales', 'overview', 'publication_date'. Confirm test coverage for filtering bylocale,provider,object_type.
778-779: Confirmstrategic-scenariosalignment.
gravity: RISK_IMPACT_FILTERmight differ from other scenario types. Reuse or unify if they share the same scale or data structure.
818-825: Re-check theextrasection for potential cleanup.
Filters at lines 820-825 are explicitly set toundefined. Remove them if no longer relevant, or define them properly if placeholders.
🛑 Comments failed to post (4)
backend/library/utils.py (1)
541-541: 💡 Verification agent
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify content format and add type validation.
The change assumes that
self._library.contentis already parsed into a dictionary. This assumption should be validated to prevent runtime errors.Apply this diff to add type validation:
- library_objects = self._library.content + if not isinstance(self._library.content, dict): + return "Library content must be a dictionary" + library_objects = self._library.contentRun the following script to verify the content format in the codebase:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for places where StoredLibrary.content is set or modified # to verify that it's always a dictionary before reaching this code. ast-grep --pattern 'class StoredLibrary: $$$ content = $$$ $$$ ' rg -A 5 'content\s*=' --type pyLength of output: 5285
ACTION REQUIRED: Add type validation for library content in
backend/library/utils.pyThe current implementation assumes that
self._library.contentis already parsed into a dictionary. However, our repository search shows that in some cases—evidenced by test code inbackend/app_tests/api/test_utils.py—the content may initially be a JSON string that requires parsing. This discrepancy can lead to runtime errors when dictionary methods are applied.Please update the code at line 541 as follows:
- library_objects = self._library.content + if not isinstance(self._library.content, dict): + return "Library content must be a dictionary" + library_objects = self._library.contentNotes:
- Verify that returning a string is the appropriate error handling for this method; if not, consider raising an exception or handling the error based on your application’s design.
- Double-check other parts of the codebase where
StoredLibrary.contentis set or modified to ensure consistency in type handling.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if not isinstance(self._library.content, dict): return "Library content must be a dictionary" library_objects = self._library.contentfrontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelte (1)
2-2: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Update the import path for remote data handling.
The import path needs to be updated to match the latest version of @vincjo/datatables.
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest version of @vincjo/datatables and what is the correct import path for remote data handling?💡 Result:
The latest version of
@vincjo/datatablesis 2.5.0 based on its GitHub repository and NPM listing[7][10]. For remote data handling:Correct import path (since v2.x):
import { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables'Key implementation details:
- Remote data management uses
TableHandlerclass instead of legacyDataHandler[1][8]- Requires configuration during initialization:
const table = new TableHandler([], { rowsPerPage: 5, totalRows: 200, // Add server-side configuration here })The migration guide indicates legacy remote handlers (
@vincjo/datatables/remote) have moved under/legacynamespace[1][4]. For new implementations using v2.x+, all core functionality resides in the main package[8].Citations:
- 1: https://vincjo.fr/datatables/docs/client/getting-started/migration
- 2: https://datatables.net/examples/server_side/jsonp.html
- 3: https://datatables.net/forums/discussion/78178/which-editor-version-can-i-download
- 4: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@vincjo%2Fdatatables
- 5: Tables in skeleton for svelte skeletonlabs/skeleton#2441
- 6: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.data.datatable.load?view=net-9.0
- 7: https://github.com/vincjo/datatables/blob/main/package.json
- 8: https://vincjo.fr/datatables/docs/client/getting-started/overview
- 9: https://datatables.net/manual/installation
- 10: https://www.npmjs.com/~vincjo
Update Remote Data Handling Import
Please update the import in
frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/Search.svelteto reflect the migration in @vincjo/datatables v2.5.0. Replaceimport type { DataHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables/remote';with
import { TableHandler } from '@vincjo/datatables';This change aligns with the latest remote data handling implementation and removes the legacy
/remotepath.frontend/src/lib/components/ModelTable/ModelTable.svelte (1)
167-168: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle nonexistent filter definitions.
const filteredFields = Object.keys(filters);If some keys haveundefinedconfig, it could cause breakage in the loop. Consider filtering out undefined filters.- const filteredFields = Object.keys(filters); + const filteredFields = Object.entries(filters) + .filter(([, value]) => value !== undefined) + .map(([key]) => key);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const filteredFields = Object.entries(filters) .filter(([, value]) => value !== undefined) .map(([key]) => key); const filterValues: { [key: string]: any } = {};frontend/src/lib/utils/table.ts (1)
18-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Skip storing undefined filter keys.
[key: string]: ListViewFilterConfig | undefined;is convenient but can cause confusion if the object has keys that intentionally map toundefined. Filter them out as you did withObject.hasOwn().
Summary by CodeRabbit