Skip to content

[#513] Release 3.0.0#517

Merged
SonnyBA merged 15 commits intomasterfrom
release/3.0.0
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

[#513] Release 3.0.0#517
SonnyBA merged 15 commits intomasterfrom
release/3.0.0

Conversation

@SonnyBA
Copy link
Contributor

@SonnyBA SonnyBA commented Jan 9, 2025

Partially fixes #513

Changes

Adds changes required for releasing 3.0.0. This is the major release part.

`Objecttypes API`_ 2.0.0 (
`Redoc <https://redocly.github.io/redoc/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objecttypes-api/2.0.0/src/objecttypes/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`__,
`Swagger <https://petstore.swagger.io/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objecttypes-api/2.0.0/src/objecttypes/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`__
`Objecttypes API`_ 2.2.2 (
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This applies here too

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it should refer to an unreleased objecttypes but if objecttypes is released first, then I say it should.

Also, should it referrer to Objecttypes 3.0.0 since that will remove also removed API V1

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if the specification version matches the application version necessarily (see my comment at maykinmedia/objecttypes-api#149 (comment))

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As this version number refers to the specification version, we could refer here to the latest specification version (2.0.0 in this case?) and use the link of the latest application openapi specification (that of 3.0.0) so that we don't link people to older openapi specifications 🤔

@SonnyBA SonnyBA self-assigned this Jan 9, 2025
@SonnyBA SonnyBA marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2025 15:28
Copy link
Contributor

@Coperh Coperh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

`Objecttypes API`_ 2.0.0 (
`Redoc <https://redocly.github.io/redoc/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objecttypes-api/2.0.0/src/objecttypes/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`__,
`Swagger <https://petstore.swagger.io/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objecttypes-api/2.0.0/src/objecttypes/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`__
`Objecttypes API`_ 2.2.2 (
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it should refer to an unreleased objecttypes but if objecttypes is released first, then I say it should.

Also, should it referrer to Objecttypes 3.0.0 since that will remove also removed API V1

@Coperh
Copy link
Contributor

Coperh commented Jan 10, 2025

With this, are we removing support for Objecttypes-api < 3.0.0?

`Objecttypes API`_ 2.0.0 (
`Redoc <https://redocly.github.io/redoc/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objecttypes-api/2.0.0/src/objecttypes/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`__,
`Swagger <https://petstore.swagger.io/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objecttypes-api/2.0.0/src/objecttypes/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`__
`Objecttypes API`_ 2.2.2 (
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if the specification version matches the application version necessarily (see my comment at maykinmedia/objecttypes-api#149 (comment))

@SonnyBA SonnyBA requested a review from stevenbal January 13, 2025 15:49
Copy link
Collaborator

@stevenbal stevenbal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just the question remaining about the listed API spec versions in the readme, but since that seems to be incorrect on main already, I won't let it block this release

README.NL.rst Outdated
latest n/a `ReDoc <https://redocly.github.io/redoc/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objects-api/master/src/objects/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`_,
`Swagger <https://petstore.swagger.io/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objects-api/master/src/objects/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`_,
(`verschillen <https://github.com/maykinmedia/objects-api/compare/2.4.3..master#diff-b9c28fec6c3f3fa5cff870d24601d6ab7027520f3b084cc767aefd258cb8c40a>`_)
(`verschillen <https://github.com/maykinmedia/objects-api/compare/3.0.0..master>`_)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This changed in the README's in the same way the Objecttypes-API did it (renamed "Version" -> "Application version")

@Hugo-ter-Doest
Copy link

This is not breaking for OF, ZAC, KISS, OIP, ABC. I checked this with the PO's.

@SonnyBA SonnyBA merged commit d043521 into master Jan 22, 2025
15 checks passed
@SonnyBA SonnyBA deleted the release/3.0.0 branch January 22, 2025 10:33
@SonnyBA
Copy link
Contributor Author

SonnyBA commented Jan 22, 2025

With this, are we removing support for Objecttypes-api < 3.0.0?

Nope, the major version bump was needed to remove the v1 API.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Objects / Objecttypes API release

5 participants