-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RawDataRecord with unit tests #297
Conversation
tests/software_tests/database/data_record/test_abstract_data_record.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
tests/software_tests/database/data_record/test_abstract_data_record.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like that you separated data_record
module.
I have left plenty of comments, but I think this is a really good start.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #297 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 46 48 +2
Lines 2818 2859 +41
Branches 345 351 +6
=========================================
+ Hits 2818 2859 +41
|
tests/software_tests/database/data_record/test_abstract_data_record.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
almost ready to be merged
please check why codecov reports missing coverage (there is something wrong with TypeError tests, probably it would be solved after my comments are applied)
Description
Draft of Implementation for RawDataRecord with unit tests.
Refactoring the Data Records directory structure.
How Has This Been Tested?
Executing unit tests.
Process
I know the process and did my best to follow it