Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1303]🚀Add QueryAssignmentRequestBody and QueryAssignmentResponseBody #1304

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 25, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1303

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new modules for message queue assignment and query assignment functionality.
    • Added structures for handling request and response bodies related to message queue assignments.
  • Enhancements

    • Enhanced MessageRequestMode enum with serialization and deserialization capabilities for improved data interchange.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Implemented error handling in deserialization for MessageRequestMode.
  • Tests

    • Added unit tests for serialization and deserialization processes of message request modes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several enhancements to the RocketMQ Rust project, primarily focusing on the addition of new modules and structures related to message queue assignments. Key changes include the creation of the message_queue_assignment module, the MessageQueueAssignment struct, and the QueryAssignmentRequestBody and QueryAssignmentResponseBody structs. These modifications enhance serialization capabilities and define new data structures to support message queue management.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-common/src/common/message.rs Added new module: pub mod message_queue_assignment;
rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_enum.rs Updated MessageRequestMode enum to derive Hash and Eq, added Serialize and Deserialize implementations.
rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_queue_assignment.rs Introduced MessageQueueAssignment struct with fields and implemented Hash and Default traits.
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs Added new modules: pub mod query_assignment_request_body;, pub mod query_assignment_response_body;
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_assignment_request_body.rs Added QueryAssignmentRequestBody struct with fields for request parameters.
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_assignment_response_body.rs Added QueryAssignmentResponseBody struct to hold message queue assignments.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add QueryAssignmentRequestBody and QueryAssignmentResponseBody (#[1303])

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, approved, auto merge

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

🐇 In the meadow, new modules bloom,
Message queues find their room.
With structs and enums, we weave our tale,
RocketMQ's journey will surely prevail!
Let's hop along, with code so bright,
Enhancements made, all feels just right! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added AI review first Ai review pr first ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Nov 25, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Nov 25, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Nov 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_assignment_response_body.rs (1)

23-27: Add documentation comments to improve API clarity.

The struct lacks documentation comments explaining its purpose, usage, and any constraints. Consider adding documentation to help API consumers.

Apply this diff to add documentation:

+/// Response body for message queue assignment queries.
+///
+/// This struct represents the response containing a set of message queue assignments
+/// returned by the server. Each assignment in the set is unique and represents
+/// a specific message queue configuration.
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize, Default)]
 #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
 pub struct QueryAssignmentResponseBody {
+    /// The set of unique message queue assignments.
     pub message_queue_assignments: HashSet<MessageQueueAssignment>,
 }
rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_queue_assignment.rs (3)

28-34: Add documentation comments to improve code clarity.

The struct and its fields lack documentation comments explaining their purpose and usage. Consider adding rustdoc comments to improve code maintainability.

Example improvement:

+/// Represents an assignment of a message queue with its operational mode and metadata.
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize, PartialEq, Eq)]
 #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
 pub struct MessageQueueAssignment {
+    /// The optional message queue that is being assigned.
     pub message_queue: Option<MessageQueue>,
+    /// The mode of operation for this queue assignment.
     pub mode: MessageRequestMode,
+    /// Optional metadata associated with this assignment.
     pub attachments: Option<HashMap<CheetahString, CheetahString>>,
 }

49-57: Document the Default implementation rationale.

Add documentation explaining:

  • Why Pull is chosen as the default mode
  • When this default implementation should be used

Example improvement:

+/// Provides a default configuration for message queue assignment.
+/// Uses Pull mode by default as it's the most common use case.
 impl Default for MessageQueueAssignment {
     fn default() -> Self {
         MessageQueueAssignment {
             message_queue: None,
             mode: MessageRequestMode::Pull,
             attachments: None,
         }
     }
 }

1-57: Consider broader feature integration aspects.

As this struct is part of the QueryAssignment feature (#1303), consider:

  1. Adding integration tests demonstrating the interaction with QueryAssignmentRequestBody and QueryAssignmentResponseBody
  2. Documenting the relationship between these components
  3. Providing usage examples in the module-level documentation
rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_enum.rs (2)

59-59: Add documentation for MessageRequestMode enum

While the added traits are appropriate, the enum lacks documentation explaining its purpose and when to use each variant. Consider adding documentation comments to improve code maintainability.

Example improvement:

+/// Represents the mode of message request in RocketMQ.
+/// 
+/// # Variants
+/// 
+/// * `Pull` - Used for pull-based message consumption
+/// * `Pop` - Used for pop-based message consumption
 #[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Copy, Clone, Hash, Eq)]
 pub enum MessageRequestMode {
     Pull,
     Pop,
 }

163-196: Consider adding more edge case tests

While the current test coverage is good, consider adding tests for additional edge cases:

  • Deserializing malformed JSON (e.g., {)
  • Deserializing wrong types (e.g., numbers or objects instead of strings)

Example additional test:

#[test]
fn deserialize_message_request_mode_malformed() {
    let json = "{"; // Malformed JSON
    let deserialized: Result<MessageRequestMode, _> = serde_json::from_str(json);
    assert!(deserialized.is_err());

    let json = "42"; // Wrong type
    let deserialized: Result<MessageRequestMode, _> = serde_json::from_str(json);
    assert!(deserialized.is_err());
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b45646d and c53f376.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • rocketmq-common/src/common/message.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_enum.rs (4 hunks)
  • rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_queue_assignment.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_assignment_request_body.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_assignment_response_body.rs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • rocketmq-common/src/common/message.rs
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs
🔇 Additional comments (8)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_assignment_response_body.rs (2)

1-22: LGTM! Well-structured imports and proper licensing.

The license header is complete, and the imports are well-organized. Using HashSet for message queue assignments is a good choice as it ensures uniqueness.


25-27: Consider adding size constraints and validation.

The HashSet field has no size constraints, which could potentially lead to memory issues with large responses. Consider implementing size validation or using a bounded collection.

Let's check if there are any size constraints in similar response bodies:

rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_assignment_request_body.rs (2)

1-20: LGTM! Proper license header and essential imports.

The file includes the correct ASF license header and necessary imports for serialization functionality.


21-22: Verify MessageModel usage context

The use of MessageModel from the heartbeat module needs verification to ensure it's the appropriate type for assignment queries.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:

MessageModel usage is appropriate for assignment queries

The MessageModel enum from the heartbeat module is correctly used in QueryAssignmentRequestBody as it represents the same message consumption model (Broadcasting/Clustering) that's used throughout the codebase for consumer group configurations and message distribution strategies. This is evidenced by:

  • The enum is consistently used across consumer implementations and broker processors
  • It's a core part of the consumer group configuration and rebalancing logic
  • The same model types (Broadcasting/Clustering) are used for both assignment queries and actual message consumption
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the MessageModel definition and its usage context

# Check MessageModel definition
ast-grep --pattern 'enum MessageModel { $$$ }'

# Check other usages of MessageModel in similar contexts
rg -A 5 "MessageModel" --type rust

Length of output: 50693

rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_queue_assignment.rs (2)

1-27: LGTM! Well-organized imports and proper license header.

The code follows good practices with:

  • Proper Apache 2.0 license header
  • Logically grouped imports (std, external, internal)

36-47: Consider HashMap ordering impact on hash consistency.

The current Hash implementation might produce different hashes for equivalent MessageQueueAssignment instances due to non-deterministic HashMap iteration order. This could cause issues in hash-based collections.

Let's verify if there are any hash-dependent uses:

Consider using BTreeMap for deterministic ordering:

-    pub attachments: Option<HashMap<CheetahString, CheetahString>>,
+    pub attachments: Option<BTreeMap<CheetahString, CheetahString>>,
rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_enum.rs (2)

17-24: LGTM: Clean import organization

The new imports are well-organized and properly support the added serialization functionality.


74-114: LGTM: Well-implemented serialization

The serialization and deserialization implementations are robust and follow Rust best practices:

  • Proper use of the Visitor pattern
  • Consistent string representations
  • Good error handling with helpful messages

Comment on lines +23 to +31
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize, Default)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct QueryAssignmentRequestBody {
pub topic: CheetahString,
pub consumer_group: CheetahString,
pub client_id: CheetahString,
pub strategy_name: CheetahString,
pub message_model: MessageModel,
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add documentation and consider implementing additional functionality

The structure definition needs the following improvements:

  1. Add documentation comments (rustdoc) for the structure and its fields
  2. Consider adding field validation
  3. Consider implementing additional traits or methods if needed

Add documentation like this:

+/// Request body for querying message queue assignments
+/// 
+/// This structure is used in the RocketMQ protocol to request assignment information
+/// for a specific topic and consumer group combination.
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize, Default)]
 #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
 pub struct QueryAssignmentRequestBody {
+    /// The topic name for which assignments are being queried
     pub topic: CheetahString,
+    /// The consumer group requesting the assignments
     pub consumer_group: CheetahString,
+    /// Unique identifier of the client making the request
     pub client_id: CheetahString,
+    /// Name of the assignment strategy to be used
     pub strategy_name: CheetahString,
+    /// Message model type for the assignments
     pub message_model: MessageModel,
 }

Consider adding unit tests:

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn test_query_assignment_request_body_serialization() {
        // Add serialization/deserialization tests
    }
}

Comment on lines +1 to +31
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
* this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
* The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
* (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
* the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
use cheetah_string::CheetahString;
use serde::Deserialize;
use serde::Serialize;

use crate::protocol::heartbeat::message_model::MessageModel;

#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize, Default)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct QueryAssignmentRequestBody {
pub topic: CheetahString,
pub consumer_group: CheetahString,
pub client_id: CheetahString,
pub strategy_name: CheetahString,
pub message_model: MessageModel,
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Request and response bodies are properly structured but processor implementation is incomplete

The QueryAssignmentRequestBody and QueryAssignmentResponseBody are well-defined, but the processor implementation in rocketmq-broker/src/processor/query_assignment_processor.rs is incomplete with a todo!() macro. This needs to be implemented before the feature can be used.

  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/query_assignment_processor.rs: Processor implementation is a stub with todo!()
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/code/request_code.rs: Request code 400 is properly registered for QueryAssignment
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_assignment_request_body.rs: Request body structure is complete
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_assignment_response_body.rs: Response body structure is complete
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify integration with QueryAssignmentResponseBody

This request body should have a corresponding response body structure and proper integration points.


Let me check the response body implementation to ensure proper integration.


Let me check one more thing to verify if these types are properly integrated into the protocol/command system.


Let me check one final thing to verify the query assignment processor implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the complete query assignment feature implementation

# Find the corresponding response body
fd -e rs "query_assignment_response_body"

# Check for handler/processor implementations
rg -l "QueryAssignmentRequestBody|QueryAssignmentResponseBody" --type rust

# Look for test files covering this functionality
fd -e rs "test.*query.*assignment"

Length of output: 364


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the response body implementation
cat rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/query_assignment_response_body.rs

# Check if these types are used in any request/response handling code
rg -A 5 "QueryAssignmentRequestBody|QueryAssignmentResponseBody" --type rust

Length of output: 2282


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for command code and request/response type registration
rg -l "RemotingCommand|RequestCode" --type rust

# Then check the content of potential command registration files
ast-grep --pattern 'RequestCode::$_'

Length of output: 31228


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the query assignment processor implementation
cat rocketmq-broker/src/processor/query_assignment_processor.rs

# Check if QueryAssignment request code is properly registered
rg -A 5 "RequestCode::QueryAssignment" --type rust

Length of output: 1907

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 67.60563% with 23 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 19.04%. Comparing base (b45646d) to head (c53f376).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...mon/src/common/message/message_queue_assignment.rs 0.00% 18 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_enum.rs 94.11% 3 Missing ⚠️
...src/protocol/body/query_assignment_request_body.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...rc/protocol/body/query_assignment_response_body.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1304      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   18.97%   19.04%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         428      431       +3     
  Lines       53868    53939      +71     
==========================================
+ Hits        10224    10272      +48     
- Misses      43644    43667      +23     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Add QueryAssignmentRequestBody and QueryAssignmentResponseBody
3 participants