[ISSUE #1305]🚀Add SetMessageRequestModeRequestBody #1306
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new module and struct related to message request modes in the RocketMQ remoting protocol. A new module Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1306 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 19.04% 19.12% +0.08%
==========================================
Files 431 432 +1
Lines 53939 53995 +56
==========================================
+ Hits 10272 10328 +56
Misses 43667 43667 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs (1)
37-37: Consider adding documentation about the feature's purpose.While the module declaration is correct, the PR and linked issue (#1305) lack detailed context about this feature's purpose and usage. Consider adding documentation comments above the module declaration to explain:
- The purpose of SetMessageRequestModeRequestBody
- When and how this feature should be used
- Any related configuration or dependencies
Would you like me to help draft the documentation comments for this module?
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/set_message_request_mode_request_body.rs (2)
22-33: Consider enhancing struct and field documentation.While the
pop_share_queue_numfield is documented, consider adding:
- Struct-level documentation explaining the purpose and usage of
SetMessageRequestModeRequestBody- Documentation for the remaining fields
- Examples of usage
Here's a suggested improvement:
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize)] #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")] +/// Represents a request body for setting the message request mode for a consumer group. +/// +/// # Example +/// ``` +/// use rocketmq_remoting::protocol::body::SetMessageRequestModeRequestBody; +/// let body = SetMessageRequestModeRequestBody { +/// topic: "test_topic".into(), +/// consumer_group: "test_group".into(), +/// mode: MessageRequestMode::Pop, +/// pop_share_queue_num: 5, +/// }; +/// ``` pub struct SetMessageRequestModeRequestBody { + /// The topic name for which the message request mode is being set pub topic: CheetahString, + /// The consumer group identifier pub consumer_group: CheetahString, + /// The message request mode (Pull or Pop) pub mode: MessageRequestMode, /* consumer working in pop mode could share the MessageQueues assigned to the N (N = popShareQueueNum) consumers following it in the cid list */ pub pop_share_queue_num: i32, }
46-106: Consider enhancing test coverage.While the current tests are good, consider adding:
- Test cases for both Pull and Pop modes in serialization/deserialization
- Boundary tests for
pop_share_queue_num(negative values, max/min values)- Property-based tests using a crate like
proptestHere's an example of additional test cases:
#[test] fn test_pop_share_queue_num_boundaries() { let body = SetMessageRequestModeRequestBody { topic: CheetahString::from("test"), consumer_group: CheetahString::from("test"), mode: MessageRequestMode::Pop, pop_share_queue_num: -1, // Should this be allowed? }; // Add assertions based on requirements } #[test] fn test_mode_variations() { // Test POP mode let json = r#"{ "topic": "test_topic", "consumerGroup": "test_group", "mode": "POP", "popShareQueueNum": 3 }"#; let deserialized: SetMessageRequestModeRequestBody = serde_json::from_str(json).unwrap(); assert_eq!(deserialized.mode, MessageRequestMode::Pop); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/set_message_request_mode_request_body.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs (1)
37-37: LGTM! Module declaration follows project conventions.
The new module declaration follows the existing pattern and naming conventions.
Let's verify the implementation file exists:
✅ Verification successful
Implementation verified and well-structured
The implementation file exists and contains a properly implemented struct with:
- Complete struct definition with all required fields
- Default implementation
- Comprehensive test coverage including serialization/deserialization
- Proper documentation and licensing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation file exists and contains the expected struct
# Check if the implementation file exists
fd "set_message_request_mode_request_body.rs" --type f
# Verify the struct implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'struct SetMessageRequestModeRequestBody'
Length of output: 194
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the implementation file to verify the struct definition
cat rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/set_message_request_mode_request_body.rs
Length of output: 4256
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/set_message_request_mode_request_body.rs (3)
1-21: LGTM! License and imports are properly structured.
The license header follows ASF guidelines, and all imports are relevant to the implementation.
35-44: LGTM! Default implementation is well-structured.
The default values are sensible and the implementation is clear.
22-106: Verify consistency with other request body implementations.
Let's ensure this implementation follows the same patterns as other request bodies in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the request body implementations further to ensure complete verification.
Implementation follows consistent patterns with other request bodies
The implementation of SetMessageRequestModeRequestBody aligns well with other request body implementations in the codebase:
- Uses the standard
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]attribute like other request bodies - Implements
Debug,Clone,Serialize,Deserializetraits consistently - Provides comprehensive test coverage including serialization, deserialization, and default value tests
- Uses
CheetahStringtype for string fields, matching the pattern seen in other request bodies likeQueryAssignmentRequestBody - Implements
Defaulttrait with appropriate default values
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check patterns in other request body implementations
# Find similar request body implementations
echo "Searching for similar request body patterns..."
rg -l "RequestBody" --type rust
# Check serialization patterns
echo "Checking serialization patterns..."
rg "#\[serde\(rename_all = \"camelCase\"\)\]" --type rust
# Check Default trait implementations
echo "Checking Default trait patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'impl Default for $type {
fn default() -> Self {
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 8545
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the structure and implementation of other request bodies
echo "Checking other request body implementations..."
fd "request_body.rs" | xargs cat
# Check test patterns in request bodies
echo "Checking test patterns..."
rg "fn serialize_.+_request_body|fn deserialize_.+_request_body" --type rust -A 5
Length of output: 14635
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1305
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests