-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 367
GSoC 2023 Improving Parameters and Standardizing Results in pgr_withPointsDD Function for pgRouting
- Proposal
- Participants
- Weekly Report and Plan
- Log of Pull Requests
- Slides
- Final Report
- Pre-Bonding Period
- References
This project aims to enhance the functionality of the pgr_withPointsDD function in pgRouting by improving the 'driver_side' optional parameter, adding a result column and normalizing the output. And all overloads will be implemented(Single vertex & Multiple vertices). The pgr_withPointsDD function modifies the graph to include points and using Dijkstra algorithm, extracts all the nodes and points that have costs less than or equal to the value from the starting point. The edges extracted will conform to the corresponding spanning tree.
Signature of current pgr_withPointsDD function:
pgr_withPointsDD(Edges SQL, Points SQL, root vid, distance, [options A])
pgr_withPointsDD(Edges SQL, Points SQL, root vids, distance, [options B])
options A: [directed, driving_side, details]
options B: [directed, driving_side, details, equicost]
RETURNS SET OF (seq, [start_vid], node, edge, cost, agg_cost)
OR EMPTY SET
While the pgr_withPointsDD function has been successfully implemented, further improvements are necessary. Specifically, the result columns need to include depth of node, and the 'driver_side' optional parameter requires refinement to enhance routing control and accuracy. Additionally, normalizing the output of all overloads will make the function more user-friendly.
The pgr_withPointDD function will likely officially be part of the next major release, so it is very important to overload and improve it.
- The pgr_withPointsDD function is, in fact, the pgr_drivingDistance function equipped to handle routing issues where the inputs are custom points rather than existing nodes in the graph. This makes it better suited for use in real-world scenarios, providing more practical routing solutions.
- Standardize the output of the function pgr_withPointsDD by adding a column to make the returns including the depth of node, so that it has a unified output with other DD functions and expand the usability of the function.
- Improve documentation on how to migrate to new features, making it easy for users and other developers to adapt to the new overloaded function.
-
pgr_withPointsDD with all overloads:
- single vertex
- multiple vertices
-
driving_side CHAR:
- Before:
Value in[r, l, b]
indicating if the driving side is:
r
for right driving side.
l
for left driving side.
b
for both.
- After:
Value in
[r, R, L, l]
indicating if the driving side is:
r,R
for right driving side.br>l,L
for left driving side.
Any other value (including NULL) will be considered asr
.
- Before:
-
Return columns on all overloads:
- Before:
seq, [start_vid], node, edge, cost, agg_cost
- After:
seq, depth, start_vid, node, edge, cost, agg_cost
- Before:
-
Users Documentation of the function.
-
Documentation on how to migrate to the new function.
-
pgTap test cases.
Detailed Proposal in PDF format
Title | GitHub Handle | Name |
---|---|---|
1st Mentor | @robe2 | Regina Obe |
2nd Mentor | @cvvergara | Vicky Vergara |
Student Developer | @squarege | Yige Huang |
- Introduce myself to the community, interact with mentors, and actively get involved in the discussion.
- Setting up the Development Environment
- Develop a better understanding of PostgreSQL, PostGIS and how they interact with pgRouting.
- Set up the wiki page to keep track of weekly progress.
- Introductory Mail - [SoC], [pgrouting-dev]
- Commmunity Bonding Period Report Mail - [SoC], [pgrouting-dev]
- Create the OSGeo User ID,request writing access to the OSGeo wiki, for editing all info related to my project.
- Set up the development environment.
- Interact with mentors, introduce myself to the community, and actively get involved in the discussion.
- Set up a wiki page to keep track of weekly progress.
- Add a wiki link to OSGeo's accepted student's wiki page.
- Studied GSoC students guide and the OSGeo recommendations for students.
- Introduce myself and my project on OSGeo's SOC and pgrouting-dev mailing list.
- Get familiar with pgRouting’s development style. Understand expected coding, documentation, and testing standards set by pgRouting.
- Develop a better understanding of PostgreSQL, PostGIS, Pl/pgSQL, and how they interact with pgRouting.
- Learn to create unit tests using pgTAP.
- Learned how and where to create Pull Request, merge and how to commit, etc.
- Created a public repository
GSoC-pgRouting
where all my works are reflected in the GSoC period. - Created a new branch named
yige-2023
in the GSoC-pgRouting repository, where I will be merging all the Pull Requests.
-
May 8th
- Clarified the content structure of osgeo wiki page and pgrouting GSoC wiki page
- Reviewed pgRouting GSoC wiki page
- Dealt with an issue New OSGeo users are unable to edit the wiki pages
-
May 15th
- Discussed whether should change or keep the function names.
-
May 29th
- Prepared branch on GSoC repository
- Made first PR to the prepared branch
- Got clarity on where to begin work.
- Basic skeleton for documentation and tests
- Code skeleton of SQL , C and C++ code
-
Report Mail - [SoC], [pgrouting-dev]
-
What did I get done this week?
- Created a branch in the GSoC-pgRouting repository.
- Follow mentor's guide: Watched video at: pr-2521-simplify-dijkstra-code, together with the PR: pgRouting/pgrouting#2521.
- Studied how to standardize the output columns of a function, adjust documentation queries results, and other related tasks by following PR: pgRouting/pgrouting#2516.
- Made a PR of adding my name to the contributor's list.
-
What do I plan on doing next week?
- Catch up on my week 1 work.
- Start standardizing the output columns of
pgr_withPointsDD
.
-
Am I blocked on anything?
Due to my final exams, I wasn't able to devote so much time to the project that there was no real progress in code. But I will catch up on my work in the coming week. I have already communicated about this and received approval from mentor.
- Design and modify the acceptable values of the 'driving_side' parameter.
-
Report Mail - [SoC], [pgrouting-dev]
-
What did I get done this week?
- Standardized the output columns of
pgr_withPointsDD
by adding a columnstart_vid
in single vertex overload. - Changed acceptable values of the optional parameter
driving_side
:- from:
Value in
[r, l, b]
indicating if the driving side is:
r
for right driving side.
l
for left driving side.
b
for both.
- to:
Value in
[r, R, L, l]
indicating if the driving side is:
r,R
for right driving side.
l,L
for left driving side.
Any other value (including NULL) will be considered asr
.
- from:
Value in
- Updated pgTap.
- Standardized the output columns of
-
What do I plan on doing next week?
- Work on adding a new column
depth
to pgr_withPointsDD. - Reference pgr_primDD/pgr_kruskalDD to carry out the work.
- Work on adding a new column
-
Am I blocked on anything?
- No.
- Design and implement the addition of a 'depth' column to the result columns.
-
Report Mail - [SoC], [pgrouting-dev]
-
What did I get done this week?
- Had a meeting with mentors and identified a new function signature, which can be found here.
- Reverted last week's changes
- Created new
pgr_withPointsDD
:
pgr_withPointsDD([Edges SQL, Points SQL, root vid, distance, driving side, [options A])
pgr_withPointsDD([Edges SQL, Points SQL, root vid, distance, driving side, [options B])
options A: [directed, details]
options B: [directed, details, equicost]
RETURNS SET OF (seq, start_vid, node, edge, cost, agg_cost)
OR EMPTY SET
where: In driving side, "Both" is only valid on undirected graphs
-
What do I plan on doing next week?
- adding
depth
output column to new pgr_withPointsDD.
- adding
-
Am I blocked on anything?
NO.
- Implementing pgr_withPointsDD() function with all overloads (Single Vertex & Multiple Vertices).
-
Report Mail - [SoC], [pgrouting-dev]
-
What did I get done this week?
- Work on the feedback last week.
- Create basic skeleton for calculating
depth
, more details can be found here.
-
What do I plan on doing next week?
- Continue the work of adding
depth
output column.
- Continue the work of adding
-
Am I blocked on anything?
- Due to the lack of understanding of pgRouting's graph, edge, node and other related data structures and vistor, my coding work is somewhat difficult. But I will learn about them by reading the source code and constantly debugging experiments. Hope to finish the work of adding the new column next week without a hitch.
- Prepare the test data and design SQL query.
-
Report Mail - [SoC], [pgrouting-dev]
-
What did I get done this week?
- Finished the work of adding new output column
depth
. - Tested locally and got expected results.
- Finished the work of adding new output column
-
What do I plan on doing next week?
- Catch up previous plans.
- Design more SQL query test.
-
Am I blocked on anything?
- NO.
- Basic testing of the function.
- Prepare First coding report.
-
Report Mail - [SoC], [pgrouting-dev]
-
What did I get done this week?
- Checked
driving side
parameter at SQL level instead of C/C++ level. - Updated docqueries for the old withPointsDD function.
- Fixed bug.
- Checked
-
What do I plan on doing next week?
- Prepare for First Evaluation.
- Discuss progress and something difficulties with mentor.
- Work on feedback.
-
Am I blocked on anything?
- Lack of knowledge about pgtap, it takes time to learn. I will ask mentor for guidance when necessary.
- Submit working pgr_withPointsDD() function along (without pgTap test and documentation).
- Work on the feedback as provided from the First Evaluation.
- Bug fixing.
- Prepare second coding period Synopsis.
-
Report Mail - [SoC], [pgrouting-dev]
-
What did I get done this week?
-
What do I plan on doing next week?
- Validate 'driving side' parameter.
- Work on feedback.
-
Am I blocked on anything?
- No this week.
- pgTap unit tests.
-
Report Mail - [SoC], [pgrouting-dev]
-
What did I get done this week?
- Removed the extraneous files and combined them with the old files.
- Validated
driving side
as mentioned in here:- if directed graph then valid values
r
&l
. - if undirected graph then valid values
b
.
- if directed graph then valid values
- Adjusted pgtap tests and docqueries.
- Made my code pass all the tests.
-
What do I plan on doing next week?
- Update documentation.
-
Am I blocked on anything?
- No.
- Migration documentation
- Query test using sample data on pgRouting documentation.
-
Report Mail - [SoC], [pgrouting-dev]
-
What did I get done this week?
-
What do I plan on doing next week?
- Meeting with mentors.
- Working on update tests.
-
Am I blocked on anything?
- No.
- Fixing bugs, testing more.
- Working on the details of the document.
-
Report Mail - [SoC], [pgrouting-dev]
-
What did I get done this week?
- Practiced:
- Improved documentation of pgr_withPointsDD.
- Watched Twitch by Vicky to learn how to prepare for a PR.
- Removed code that should have been removed before.
-
What do I plan on doing next week?
- Meeting with mentors.
- Start preparing for PR to the main repo.
-
Am I blocked on anything?
- No.
- Preparing for Final Delivery.
- Integrating to develop branch in the main repository.
- Review, complete and finalize all documentation and tests.
- Create a detailed final report.
- Submit complete project with all required functions, documentation and unit pgTap test cases.
- Submit final report and evaluation of mentors.
Link to all the Pull Requests I made in GSoC-pgRouting repository for GSoC 2023
Pull Request | Description | Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|
#325 | GSoC-2023: Yige Huang Week 8 | July 23th, 2023 | Merged |
#324 | GSoC-2023: Yige Huang Week 7 | July 16st, 2023 | Merged |
#318 | GSoC-2023: Yige Huang Week 6 | July 8th, 2023 | Merged |
#313 | GSoC-2023: Yige Huang Week 5 | July 1st, 2023 | Merged |
#309 | GSoC-2023: Yige Huang Week 4 | July 24th, 2023 | Merged |
#303 | GSoC-2023: Yige Huang Week 3 | July 15th, 2023 | Merged |
#299 | GSoC-2023: Yige Huang Week 2 | June 9th, 2023 | Merged |
#291 | GSoC-2023: Yige Huang Week 1 | June 4th, 2023 | Merged |
#278 | Task 2: Experience with GitHub & Git | March 23th, 2022 | GSoC Task Pull Request - Not to Merge |