Run write-manifest on PRs to dev

[jthompson-arcus]

Addresses #772

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.61%. Comparing base (4fa6e61) to head (42bf8be).
Report is 50 commits behind head on dev.

❗ Current head 42bf8be differs from pull request most recent head 8881159. Consider uploading reports for the commit 8881159 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #773   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.61%   81.61%           
=======================================
  Files          34       34           
  Lines        5277     5277           
=======================================
  Hits         4307     4307           
  Misses        970      970           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Jeff-Thompson12]

Testing comment review

[Jeff-Thompson12]

Testing approval review

[Jeff-Thompson12]

Approval testing 2

[Jeff-Thompson12]

Testing approval 3

[Jeff-Thompson12]

Approval testing 4

[jthompson-arcus]

@aclark02-arcus For some reason the checksum always updated for .Rprofile, so I decided to remove it from the manifest creation process. The main issue with this process is that the write-manifest is triggered after a reviewer approves the PR. The process then adds a commit which makes the review stale, requiring the reviewer to approve the request a second time as well.

Thoughts?

[jthompson-arcus]

Skipped in draft

[jthompson-arcus]

@aclark02-arcus I believe this has all the functionality we want now. Only negative I can think of now is that our normal checks are no longer sitting at the head of the branch.

[aclark02-arcus]

Amazing work!