Skip to content

Conversation

@pcanal
Copy link
Member

@pcanal pcanal commented Feb 8, 2026

This is a missing commit for #21183 which was merge a bit too soon.

@pcanal pcanal requested a review from jblomer February 8, 2026 16:48
@pcanal pcanal self-assigned this Feb 8, 2026
@pcanal
Copy link
Member Author

pcanal commented Feb 8, 2026

Note that 588b29e was also not reviewed.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2026

Test Results

    22 files  +    1      22 suites  +1   3d 9h 24m 26s ⏱️ - 2h 59m 12s
 3 777 tests ±    0   3 728 ✅ ±    0    1 💤 ±0   48 ❌ ± 0 
75 140 runs  +2 831  73 981 ✅ +2 812  253 💤  - 2  906 ❌ +21 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit c103e87. ± Comparison against base commit 588b29e.

@ferdymercury
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing #20498 since it seems this is an alternative / better approach

Comment on lines +2596 to +2597
ULong64_t startpos = static_cast<ULong64_t>(fBufCur-fBuffer);
ULong64_t cntpos = startpos <= kMaxCountPosition ? startpos : kOverflowPosition;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we need to push the startpos on the stack if it's large?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants