Skip to content

Check all dimensions of fragment for overlap #3991

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

XanthosXanthopoulos
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue and/or context: sc-65811

Changes:

Notes for Reviewer:

Base automatically changed from xan/sc-64438/nnz-optimization to main April 24, 2025 15:22
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 25, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.49%. Comparing base (84f7e2d) to head (a090772).
Report is 22 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3991      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.18%   89.49%   +0.30%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines        6901     6902       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         6155     6177      +22     
+ Misses        746      725      -21     
Flag Coverage Δ
python 89.49% <ø> (+0.30%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
python_api 89.49% <ø> (+0.30%) ⬆️
libtiledbsoma ∅ <ø> (∅)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@XanthosXanthopoulos XanthosXanthopoulos marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2025 16:43
@XanthosXanthopoulos XanthosXanthopoulos changed the title Check all numerical dimensions of fragment for overlap Check all dimensions of fragment for overlap May 9, 2025
@bkmartinjr
Copy link
Member

Once we land #4050, I think this PR is most likely obsolete and can be closed.

@jp-dark jp-dark closed this May 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants