Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(helm): teach rosco to write helm overrides to a file #1135

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dbyron-sf
Copy link
Contributor

@dbyron-sf dbyron-sf commented Jan 26, 2025

to address an error in HelmTemplateUtils that occurs when the command line becomes too long due to a large number of overrides. The solution is to introduce a configurable threshold (helm.overridesFileThreshold). If the total length of override values exceeds this threshold, write them to a file and use the --values option when invoking Helm. The default behaviour (threshold of 0) retains the current approach of not using a file, regardless of the length of the overrides.

Note that there are a number of commits here, as we iterated on the fix internally. It turns out it's super complicated to get info in a values file with the same behavior in both helm v2 and helm v3 that we get with --set/--set-string. At this point it probably makes the most sense to look at all commits together, but I left them separate at least to start if folks are curious about the journey.

Arun Vijayan and others added 6 commits January 25, 2025 11:29
The goal is to address an error in HelmTemplateUtils that occurs when the command line becomes too long due to a large number of overrides. The solution is to introduce a configurable threshold. If the overrides exceed this threshold, write them to a file and use the --values option when invoking Helm. The default behaviour (threshold of 0) retains the current approach of not using a file, regardless of the size of the overrides.
…elm template command line

ensure override precedence in helm template by appending --values with overrides at the command end, as --set/--set-string override --values in Helm 2.16.1 and 3.4.1, and later --values take highest precedence
When creating overrides YAML files with nested key structures, they are being represented as flattened rather than structured keys. This leads to discrepancies in the output of the helm template command when comparing the use of --set/--set-string versus --values with an overrides YAML. While --set/--set-string correctly renders keys with their nested structure, using --values with a YAML file resulted in the omission of these nested keys.  This fixes that, so nested keys work.

For example, if an override was specified as
```
overrides:
  image.tag: "foo"
```
before this PR, the value of image.tag wouldn't be "foo", it would be the default value in the helm chart.  With this PR, the value of image.tag is "foo".

A new HelmSetArgumentParser class inspired by Helm's Go code for parsing --set arguments handles complex nested structures, including lists and maps, and supports type inference for values.
…absolute value is >= 1,000,000

Helm 3 treats large numbers (greater than or equal to 1,000,000) as int64 when passed via --set, and as float64 when passed via --values. This behavior causes a difference in the template output, with large numeric values being output in non-scientific notation when using --set, and in scientific notation when using --values. To maintain consistent Helm 3 template behavior in Spinnaker, it is necessary to skip the overrides YAML file feature if any of the overrides' value is greater than or equal to 1,000,000.
…wnloaderTest to rosco-integration

The tests V2BakeryControllerWithArtifactDownloaderTest depend on an executable named helm3 being in the path, and an executable named helm being helm v2.  This isn't typically the case (anymore) on the local file system of developer machines.

Moving the tests to rosco-integration means using the helm executables from the just-built docker image, where these dependencies are satisfied.  As well, as we upgrade the versions of helm in rosco, we'll verify that override handling logic continues to function.
@dbyron-sf dbyron-sf force-pushed the write_helm_overrides_to_file branch from 2e5587d to 88193c8 Compare January 26, 2025 04:12
@dbyron-sf dbyron-sf marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2025 04:14
@@ -126,12 +126,17 @@ protected List<String> buildOverrideList(Map<String, Object> overrides) {
.collect(Collectors.toList());
}

/** Accessor for whether to expand artifact reference URIs */
protected boolean isExpandArtifactReferenceURIs() {
return (artifactStore != null && helmConfig.isExpandOverrides());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you explain the use case for this a little bit? Im unsure why you want to not expand something in rosco? Or maybe Im misunderstanding how this works.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Before this change, artifact references would sometimes remain in the values file, e.g.:

Created overrides file at /tmp/rosco-9390928878072864271/overrides_d07566cf-e592-4b43-ad94-d947782f4a88.yml with the following contents:
---
my-override: "ref://dbyrontest/7678d0be07b31c883c436a70522c58ec0f724f1bf8bbeb293165e330f495e321"

Copy link
Contributor Author

@dbyron-sf dbyron-sf Jan 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The override in question was configured as:

"my-override": "${#stage(\"Bake (Manifest)\").outputs.resolvedExpectedArtifacts[0].boundArtifact.reference}"

as in, there's a bake stage with an override whose value is the result of a prior bake stage.

Copy link
Contributor

@xibz xibz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall looks good. I am unsure how float values would work, so I wanted a float test, but otherwise this looks good.

private static Stream<Arguments> helmParseArgs() {

return Stream.of(
Arguments.of("name1=value1", Map.of("name1", "value1"), true),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a float test?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done in a0da916.

before this, the values file would contain a string, even if rawOverrides is true.

In other words, `--set my-override=1.234` would become
```
my-override: "1.234"
```

After this change, it's:
```
my-override: 1.234
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants