-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: ensure FORMAT sample order is in-sync with header sample order #671
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@tedil has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
WalkthroughThe changes in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/annotate/strucvars/mod.rs (2)
Line range hint
363-368
: Remove duplicate FORMAT field definition.The FORMAT field "src" is defined twice with identical parameters. This is redundant and should be removed.
- "src", // FIXME this is clearly the same format as above?! - Map::<Format>::new( - FormatNumber::Count(1), - Type::Integer, - "Split-end variant support", - ),
Line range hint
2184-2190
: Improve error handling in coordinate filling.The function uses unwrap/expect which could be replaced with proper error handling and more descriptive messages.
- .expect("chromosome not canonical"); + .ok_or_else(|| anyhow::anyhow!("Chromosome {} is not in the canonical set", &tsv_record.chromosome))?; - .expect("Telomeric breakend not supported") + .ok_or_else(|| anyhow::anyhow!("Telomeric breakends are not supported in this implementation"))?
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/annotate/strucvars/mod.rs (2)
429-443
: Consider improving pedigree handling implementation.The implementation could be enhanced in a few ways:
- The debug message could include more context about why the sample was skipped
- The HashMap conversion could be more concise using
into_iter()
- let individuals = pedigree - .individuals - .values() - .map(|i| (i.name.clone(), i)) - .collect::<HashMap<_, _>>(); + let individuals: HashMap<_, _> = pedigree.individuals.values().map(|i| (&i.name, i)).collect(); for sample in header.sample_names() { let individual = individuals.get(sample); if individual.is_none() { - tracing::debug!("Sample {} not part of the pedigree, skipping.", sample); + tracing::debug!("Sample {} not found in pedigree definition, skipping sample.", sample); continue; }
Line range hint
1201-1288
: Add missing documentation for struct fields.Several fields in the VarFishStrucvarTsvRecord struct lack documentation. Consider adding documentation for all fields to improve code maintainability.
Example for a few fields:
/// A record, as written out to a VarFish TSV file. #[derive(Debug, Default, Serialize, Deserialize, Clone, PartialEq)] pub struct VarFishStrucvarTsvRecord { /// The genome assembly/build. pub release: String, /// Chromosome name of start position. pub chromosome: String, + /// Numeric representation of the chromosome (1-22, X=23, Y=24, M=25) pub chromosome_no: u32, + /// UCSC bin for efficient interval queries pub bin: u32, // ... other fields }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/annotate/strucvars/mod.rs
(5 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Testing
- GitHub Check: Schema
- GitHub Check: Linting
- GitHub Check: build-and-push-image
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Fixes #668
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor