Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add Solana RPC status check and some refactor around RPC status check #2751

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

ws4charlie
Copy link
Contributor

@ws4charlie ws4charlie commented Aug 20, 2024

Description

  • Add RPC status check for Solana chain.
  • Refactor EVM/Bitcoin RPC status check.

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Tested CCTX in localnet
  • Tested in development environment
  • Go unit tests
  • Go integration tests
  • Tested via GitHub Actions

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced real-time RPC status monitoring for Solana and Bitcoin chains.
    • Added functionality for checking RPC status and retrieving block time for the Solana chain.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced logging for better monitoring of RPC connections.
  • Documentation

    • Updated changelog to reflect new features and improvements.
  • Tests

    • Expanded test suite with new functions for checking RPC status for Bitcoin and Solana chains.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This update introduces significant enhancements to the RPC monitoring capabilities across multiple blockchain chains, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. Key features include the addition of new methods for checking RPC statuses, improved latency thresholds, and the restructuring of observer functionalities. These changes aim to enhance real-time monitoring, interoperability, and operational transparency within the ecosystem, ultimately improving the reliability of blockchain interactions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/... Removed WatchRPCStatus method; updated comments in GetSenderAddressByVin.
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/... Added rpcLatencyThreshold constant and CheckRPCStatus function for enhanced RPC monitoring.
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go Introduced LiveTestCheckRPCStatus for testing RPC status.
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/... Removed WatchRPCStatus method; adjusted observer functionality.
zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/... Added rpcLatencyThreshold and CheckRPCStatus function.
zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc_live_test.go New function LiveTest_CheckRPCStatus for testing.
zetaclient/chains/interfaces/interfaces.go Added GetBlockTime method to SolanaRPCClient interface.
zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/... Introduced background worker for monitoring RPC status; added WatchRPCStatus method.
zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/... Added rpcLatencyThreshold and CheckRPCStatus function for health checks.
zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc_live_test.go Introduced LiveTest_CheckRPCStatus.
zetaclient/common/constant.go Added RPCStatusCheckInterval constant for status checks.
zetaclient/testutils/mocks/solana_rpc.go New GetBlockTime method in the SolanaRPCClient mock implementation.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Observer as Observer
    participant RPCClient as RPC Client
    participant Logger as Logger

    Observer->>RPCClient: CheckRPCStatus()
    RPCClient-->>Observer: Return status
    Observer->>Logger: Log RPC status
    Note over Observer: Periodic checks based on RPCStatusCheckInterval
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

!!!WARNING!!!
nosec detected in the following files: zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go

Be very careful about using #nosec in code. It can be a quick way to suppress security warnings and move forward with development, it should be employed with caution. Suppressing warnings with #nosec can hide potentially serious vulnerabilities. Only use #nosec when you're absolutely certain that the security issue is either a false positive or has been mitigated in another way.

Only suppress a single rule (or a specific set of rules) within a section of code, while continuing to scan for other problems. To do this, you can list the rule(s) to be suppressed within the #nosec annotation, e.g: /* #nosec G401 */ or //#nosec G201 G202 G203
Broad #nosec annotations should be avoided, as they can hide other vulnerabilities. The CI will block you from merging this PR until you remove #nosec annotations that do not target specific rules.

Pay extra attention to the way #nosec is being used in the files listed above.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the nosec label Aug 20, 2024
@ws4charlie ws4charlie added chain:solana zetaclient Issues related to ZetaClient mainnet and removed mainnet labels Aug 20, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 17.69231% with 107 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 66.89%. Comparing base (75a4189) to head (a7fee2c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go 0.00% 18 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/rpc_status.go 0.00% 18 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/rpc_status.go 0.00% 17 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go 0.00% 16 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go 0.00% 12 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc.go 0.00% 12 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/config/config_chain.go 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer.go 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/observer.go 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
... and 1 more
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2751      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    66.94%   66.89%   -0.05%     
===========================================
  Files          373      377       +4     
  Lines        21032    21082      +50     
===========================================
+ Hits         14080    14103      +23     
- Misses        6288     6315      +27     
  Partials       664      664              
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go 86.93% <100.00%> (+0.83%) ⬆️
zetaclient/config/types.go 11.62% <ø> (ø)
zetaclient/orchestrator/bootstrap.go 58.95% <100.00%> (+0.54%) ⬆️
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go 38.31% <50.00%> (+5.42%) ⬆️
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer.go 74.50% <50.00%> (+12.42%) ⬆️
zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/observer.go 40.62% <50.00%> (+0.30%) ⬆️
zetaclient/common/env.go 83.33% <83.33%> (ø)
zetaclient/config/config_chain.go 12.00% <0.00%> (-0.77%) ⬇️
zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 4 more

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 10

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (8)
zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (2)

25-25: Consider integrating LiveTest_CheckRPCStatus into the main test suite.

The function LiveTest_CheckRPCStatus is commented out in Test_EVMRPCLive. Consider uncommenting it to ensure it runs as part of the test suite, or provide a rationale for keeping it separate.


49-56: Ensure comprehensive error handling in LiveTest_CheckRPCStatus.

While this test function checks the RPC status, consider adding more detailed assertions or logging to capture potential issues more effectively. This can help in diagnosing failures during test runs.

zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (2)

18-18: Consider integrating LiveTest_CheckRPCStatus into the main test suite.

The function LiveTest_CheckRPCStatus is commented out in Test_SolanaRPCLive. Consider uncommenting it to ensure it runs as part of the test suite, or provide a rationale for keeping it separate.


60-68: Ensure comprehensive error handling in LiveTest_CheckRPCStatus.

While this test function checks the RPC status, consider adding more detailed assertions or logging to capture potential issues more effectively. This can help in diagnosing failures during test runs.

zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go (1)

95-97: Enhance logging details in CheckRPCStatus.

The logging in CheckRPCStatus provides basic information. Consider adding more detailed logs, such as including the RPC URL or client ID, to aid in debugging.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 95-97: zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go#L95-L97
Added lines #L95 - L97 were not covered by tests

zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc.go (1)

156-158: Enhance logging details in CheckRPCStatus.

The logging in CheckRPCStatus provides basic information. Consider adding more detailed logs, such as including the RPC URL or client ID, to aid in debugging.

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go (2)

171-173: Improve error context for GetBlockCount.

While the error message indicates an RPC issue, consider adding more context to aid debugging, such as the server address or client state.

- return errors.Wrap(err, "GetBlockCount error: RPC down?")
+ return errors.Wrapf(err, "GetBlockCount error: RPC down? Host: %s", client.Host())
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 171-173: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go#L171-L173
Added lines #L171 - L173 were not covered by tests


189-196: Consider reducing the latency threshold.

The rpcLatencyThreshold is set to 1200 seconds, which might be too lenient for certain applications. Evaluate whether a lower threshold could improve responsiveness without causing false alarms.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 189-196: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go#L189-L196
Added lines #L189 - L196 were not covered by tests

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 53883f5 and b0de92a.

Files selected for processing (16)
  • changelog.md (1 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go (3 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go (1 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go (3 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (3 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer.go (2 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/rpc_status.go (1 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go (2 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (3 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/interfaces/interfaces.go (1 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/observer.go (1 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/rpc_status.go (1 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc.go (2 hunks)
  • zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (5 hunks)
  • zetaclient/common/constant.go (2 hunks)
  • zetaclient/testutils/mocks/solana_rpc.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • changelog.md
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (15)
zetaclient/common/constant.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/rpc_status.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/rpc_status.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/observer.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/chains/interfaces/interfaces.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/testutils/mocks/solana_rpc.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

GitHub Check: codecov/patch
zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/rpc_status.go

[warning] 12-13: zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/rpc_status.go#L12-L13
Added lines #L12 - L13 were not covered by tests


[warning] 15-20: zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/rpc_status.go#L15-L20
Added lines #L15 - L20 were not covered by tests


[warning] 23-25: zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/rpc_status.go#L23-L25
Added lines #L23 - L25 were not covered by tests


[warning] 27-28: zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/rpc_status.go#L27-L28
Added lines #L27 - L28 were not covered by tests

zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/rpc_status.go

[warning] 13-14: zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/rpc_status.go#L13-L14
Added lines #L13 - L14 were not covered by tests


[warning] 16-21: zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/rpc_status.go#L16-L21
Added lines #L16 - L21 were not covered by tests


[warning] 24-26: zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/rpc_status.go#L24-L26
Added lines #L24 - L26 were not covered by tests


[warning] 28-29: zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/rpc_status.go#L28-L29
Added lines #L28 - L29 were not covered by tests

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go

[warning] 12-13: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go#L12-L13
Added lines #L12 - L13 were not covered by tests


[warning] 15-20: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go#L15-L20
Added lines #L15 - L20 were not covered by tests


[warning] 23-26: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go#L23-L26
Added lines #L23 - L26 were not covered by tests


[warning] 29-30: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go#L29-L30
Added lines #L29 - L30 were not covered by tests

zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go

[warning] 64-64: zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go#L64
Added line #L64 was not covered by tests


[warning] 66-68: zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go#L66-L68
Added lines #L66 - L68 were not covered by tests


[warning] 72-74: zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go#L72-L74
Added lines #L72 - L74 were not covered by tests


[warning] 78-80: zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go#L78-L80
Added lines #L78 - L80 were not covered by tests


[warning] 85-92: zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go#L85-L92
Added lines #L85 - L92 were not covered by tests


[warning] 95-97: zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go#L95-L97
Added lines #L95 - L97 were not covered by tests

zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc.go

[warning] 127-127: zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc.go#L127
Added line #L127 was not covered by tests


[warning] 129-131: zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc.go#L129-L131
Added lines #L129 - L131 were not covered by tests


[warning] 135-137: zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc.go#L135-L137
Added lines #L135 - L137 were not covered by tests

zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/observer.go

[warning] 135-135: zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/observer.go#L135
Added line #L135 was not covered by tests

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go

[warning] 169-169: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go#L169
Added line #L169 was not covered by tests


[warning] 171-173: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go#L171-L173
Added lines #L171 - L173 were not covered by tests


[warning] 177-179: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go#L177-L179
Added lines #L177 - L179 were not covered by tests


[warning] 183-185: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go#L183-L185
Added lines #L183 - L185 were not covered by tests


[warning] 189-196: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go#L189-L196
Added lines #L189 - L196 were not covered by tests


[warning] 200-202: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go#L200-L202
Added lines #L200 - L202 were not covered by tests


[warning] 206-207: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go#L206-L207
Added lines #L206 - L207 were not covered by tests


[warning] 210-212: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go#L210-L212
Added lines #L210 - L212 were not covered by tests

Additional comments not posted (7)
zetaclient/common/constant.go (1)

3-3: Addition of RPCStatusCheckInterval is appropriate.

The introduction of RPCStatusCheckInterval enhances the configuration options for RPC status checks. This change is well-integrated and maintains the file's consistency.

Also applies to: 15-16

zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (1)

29-29: Appropriate use of context.Background().

The change from context.TODO() to context.Background() is appropriate for top-level contexts, aligning with best practices.

Also applies to: 48-48

zetaclient/chains/interfaces/interfaces.go (1)

197-197: Verify implementations of GetBlockTime.

The addition of GetBlockTime to the SolanaRPCClient interface requires all implementations to define this method. Ensure that all existing implementations are updated accordingly.

zetaclient/testutils/mocks/solana_rpc.go (1)

80-108: Ensure robust mock behavior for GetBlockTime.

The GetBlockTime mock method should simulate various scenarios, including successful retrieval and error conditions. Ensure that test cases cover these scenarios to validate the behavior of dependent code.

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (2)

250-264: New RPC status check test added.

The LiveTestCheckRPCStatus function enhances the test suite by adding a check for the RPC status of the Bitcoin chain. This addition improves the reliability of the Bitcoin client tests.


236-236: Environment variable usage for RPCHost.

The LiveTestNewRPCClient function now uses an environment variable for RPCHost, enhancing flexibility and aligning with best practices for configuration management in testing environments.

zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go (1)

342-342: Comment clarity improved for GetSenderAddressByVin.

The updated comment clarifies the requirement for running the Bitcoin node with txindex=1, which is essential for the function's operation. This enhances the documentation and user understanding.

zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/rpc_status.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/rpc_status.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/rpc_status.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/rpc_status.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/rpc_status.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/solana/observer/observer.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/rpc_status.go Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/evm/rpc/rpc.go Show resolved Hide resolved
zetaclient/chains/solana/rpc/rpc_live_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@lumtis
Copy link
Member

lumtis commented Sep 2, 2024

What is the status on this one @ws4charlie ?

zetaclient/common/env.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@swift1337 swift1337 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Left a couple of notes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chain:solana nosec zetaclient Issues related to ZetaClient
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants