-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace cumsum broadcast with accumulate #472
Conversation
Try this Pull Request!Open Julia and type: import Pkg
Pkg.activate(temp=true)
Pkg.add(url="https://github.com/CDCgov/Rt-without-renewal", rev="accumulate-vs-cumsum-broadcast", subdir="EpiAware")
using EpiAware |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #472 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.05% 90.05%
=======================================
Files 57 57
Lines 744 744
=======================================
Hits 670 670
Misses 74 74 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Benchmark resultJudge resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/Rt-without-renewal/Rt-without-renewalJob Properties
ResultsA ratio greater than
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoTarget
Baseline
Target resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/Rt-without-renewal/Rt-without-renewalJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfo
Baseline resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/Rt-without-renewal/Rt-without-renewalJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfo
Runtime information
|
So this has a different pattern of impact vs #470. Here I see slower evaluation and forward diff, no real impact on reversediff with compilation and much faster reverse diff. Is this due to a specialisation that exists for I think this one is worth changing given these results (this makes me want to get Enzyme and Tapir into the benchmarks asap) |
This is possible, but My mental model was that |
I've refreshed this test with the |
Benchmark resultJudge resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/Rt-without-renewal/Rt-without-renewalJob Properties
ResultsA ratio greater than
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoTarget
Baseline
Target resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/Rt-without-renewal/Rt-without-renewalJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfo
Baseline resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/Rt-without-renewal/Rt-without-renewalJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfo
Runtime information
|
This is still ambiguous: some cases worse, some better. As per f2f discussion with @seabbs I think that mean not going forward with this unless we get extra evidence. For example, if in a realistic inference exercise some kind of extra sampling stability improves sampling overall even if individual primal+grad calls are slower. |
Tests a single change from #470