-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
58 revise layer distribution #59
Conversation
…fferences (max 1cm), also made the delta_time check towards time steps and phase-wise phase lengths a bit more strict to prevent having corrected phase lenghts of 0, wich doesn't allow for any correction in a new phase.
…sea volumes are zero in phases where that door is closed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think you made a typo in any of the new lines for to and from quantities.
But please add 1 comment line in sealock.h to explain. It took me, with the complete background of the development process, also quite some time to understand why this distinction is important.
I checked that there is 1 unit test for (changed) method distribute_discharge_over_layers. I don't think that this new test covers all if statements in the method, but it exists. If you think more unit testing is useful for this, please add it to the wish-list for later this year. |
See issue decriptions