-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
next/190/20231117/v1 #9829
Merged
Merged
next/190/20231117/v1 #9829
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit changes the conditional logging functions to use bool rather than int values.
Change Suricata operational values from int to bool.
On a push of the same branch, cancel the previous running builds.yml workflow.
The new author details will still be available in the artifact, we're just not calling them out in a nighly visible pull request comment.
Flow_id explanation expanded from version shared by Peter Manev. Task OISF#6445
Our tls fields not_after and not_before are actually logged as `notafter` and `notbefore`, but were documented with the underscore. Update the documentation, since updating the log format itself would be a breaking change. Task OISF#5494
This is an example of what adding plugin examples to the Suricata repo could look like. This plugin is an example plugin for an EVE filetype. It could be extended to support outputs like Redis, syslog, etc. There is one issue with adding plugins like this to an autotools project, the project can't be built with --disable-shared, which is more of an autotools limitation, and not really a Suricata issue. Suricata built with --disable-shared will load plugins just fine. Note that the examples directory was added as DIST_SUBDIRS as we don't want normal builds to recurse into it and attempt to build the plugin, its just an example, but we still need to keep distcheck happy.
victorjulien
requested review from
jasonish,
jufajardini and
a team
as code owners
November 17, 2023 23:49
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #9829 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.38% 82.38% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 971 972 +1
Lines 273906 273929 +23
==========================================
+ Hits 225661 225678 +17
- Misses 48245 48251 +6
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
WARNING:
Pipeline 16603 |
This was referenced Nov 18, 2023
This was referenced Nov 18, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Staging:
SV_BRANCH=pr/1476